[Slyscribe]

It will be a long, long time before voters in battleground districts and states trust Democratic candidates. And why would quality centrists run when national leaders are going to treat them like shock troops?

[Kickass Conservative]

There are no Blue Dog Democrats, Pro Life Democrats, Fiscally Conservative Democrats or Moderate Democrats.

There are only Traitorous Democrats.

They Swear an Oath to Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America, and they Violate that Oath every Day of their lives.

[catnipman]

[Hoffer Rand]

I have to say I was surprised to see Jim Matheson voted “no.” I didn’t think he had the moral fiber to buck the party. He certainly hasn’t in the past.

[tet68]

Scratch a blue dog, find a yellow dog underneath.

[cranked]

No such thing as a “blue dog” and there never was.
Those who believed that there were such a thing were simply mimicking and entertaining Democrat/Progressives themes involving unicron and rainbow dreams.

Further, a “pro-life” Dem is an oxymoron. Understood that yet? Get with the frakin’ program, you think?!

[popdonnelly]

Again, Stupak was just looking for a little political cover to use in his re-election campaign. He got less than that from the White House.

[tobyhill]

“Blue Dog” or “Conservative Democrat”, that myth’s been busted.

[Theodore R.]

The reason you are wrong is that voters in these district do NOT know what happened, and who is going to tell them? They will just stick with their familiar “blue dogs,” thank you.