Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Attorneys General Agree To File Constitutional Challenge To Obamacare Immediately
CentristBlog.com ^ | 3/22/10 | Anonymous (Editor)

Posted on 03/22/2010 7:15:54 AM PDT by Reaganesque

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
This is just the beginning. With 37 states in the process of requiring their Attorney's General to sue the government over this abomination of a bill, the only thing the Dems have assured is that this issue will remain in the headlines throughout the election cycle. The fact that Mr. Obama and the Dems ignored their oathes of office, the Constitution and the voters, will very much be on the minds of the voters when they head into the polls this November. So, congradulations, Mr. Obama, you won...for now. See you in November.
1 posted on 03/22/2010 7:15:54 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

This is just the start. Watch the Democrats turn into the ugliest people this nation has ever seen.


2 posted on 03/22/2010 7:16:48 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Liberalism is a Socialist Disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Lets Roll. Times awasting!


3 posted on 03/22/2010 7:17:44 AM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

4 posted on 03/22/2010 7:19:56 AM PDT by AngieGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
“At no time in our history has the government mandated its citizens buy a good or service,” Cuccinelli said in a statement last night.

OK, here's an honest question. How does Social Security and Medicare stand within that argument?

5 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:06 AM PDT by OB1kNOb ( I WILL NOT COMPLY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Look for one of the conservatives on the SC to come down with a life threatening illness requiring his sudden retirement for health reasons. It’s the Chicago way.


6 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:26 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Enjoy nature - eat meat, wear fur and drive your car!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

One of the weaknesses here is that the courts might rule that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, but let the bulk of the bill stand. That would just crash the economy even more and that would be fine with the Democrats.


7 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:46 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Great news. So for those of us who aren't legal scholars, will they be asking for injunctive relief so that elements of this bill will not be enacted?

Thanks in advance!

8 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:47 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Does anyone have a list of states that are talking of suing over this?


9 posted on 03/22/2010 7:20:59 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Watch the Democrats turn into the ugliest people this nation has ever seen.

How can they get any uglier. Did you ever see bigger freak show than what we have in the Democrat house and senate?
What kind of a imbecile does a person have to be to vote for one of these ignorant freaks?


10 posted on 03/22/2010 7:21:34 AM PDT by WestwardHo (Whom the god would destroy, they first drive mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I have a crazy question. This bill allows young adults to remain on their parents health care plan until they are 26 years old.

Does this bill REQUIRE PARENTS to keep their kids on their health care plan until such time?


11 posted on 03/22/2010 7:22:17 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“With 37 states in the process of requiring their Attorney’s General to sue the government over this abomination of a bill”

Could someone please provide me with a list of those 37 states? I’d really like to know. Thanks.


12 posted on 03/22/2010 7:22:47 AM PDT by wk4bush2004 (PALIN-BACHMANN, 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Ok... so what are exactly are these states going to do about IRS enforcement by confiscation?

Are they going to give their local employers cover to refuse to collect federal withholdings, and are they going to put up a militia to forcibly bar the Federales when they come to seize assets? Because that's what it will take, in the end.

13 posted on 03/22/2010 7:22:54 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

And we may have more states to join once the elections are over:

PA Gov Poll: Corbett (R) Up Double Digits

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2010/03/22/pa-gov-poll-corbett-r-up-double-digits/


14 posted on 03/22/2010 7:23:44 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Is Fast Eddie running for re-election?


15 posted on 03/22/2010 7:24:39 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

From what I heard on Fox, they will ask for an injunction but it is difficult to say if it would be granted.


16 posted on 03/22/2010 7:24:54 AM PDT by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: keats5

Better question: Will this be deemed a right of “children” to stay on? Will the courts allow “children” to sue their parents to stay on?


17 posted on 03/22/2010 7:25:14 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Be careful. Unless anyone is aware of precedents, this is far from a done deal. You have no idea what any judge on any given day is likely to decide. After all, the Supreme Court gave us Campaign Finance Reform (though their recent decision on that one seemed to put a lot of it right - but it took another case and years of damage done before it was decided).

Here’s a question for Government Legal Types: what would happen if the states decided to simply reject the Government health Care Mandates WITHOUT going to court? What would the consequences be if any given state said: We’re not abiding by it, period?


18 posted on 03/22/2010 7:25:21 AM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

I hope these AGs are ready to be turned into the sheet wearing, state-rights neanderthals the government run stooges at ABC, NBC et al will turn them into.


19 posted on 03/22/2010 7:25:38 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

God bless.

Save our Republic.


20 posted on 03/22/2010 7:27:05 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (Tree of Librerty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson