Posted on 03/12/2010 11:23:26 AM PST by Colofornian
I thought I made it pretty clear that I can no longer support Mitt. It's been a while now.
Although, unlike some, I will absolutely vote for Mitt (or nearly anyone else...) over Obambi, if it should come to that in the election.
Sarah is my current top pick for the primaries, though her support for RINO in Chief, McCain is troubling.
Still dead. Sadly.
I will not vote for ANY ticket containing Mitt Romney.
Team Romney threw Election 2008.
How did you say that treachery was working out for you?
He sounded pretty proud of it until recently, I guess he was a bit slow on the uptake.
Agreed. Still waiting for someone to stand forward who embodies Reagan’s vision.
Huh? Moreso than McCain's people?
Umm... no.
That's pretty far-fetched to think that the guy who didn't win the primary is somehow to blame for the results of the general election.
In fairness to Mitt, he may not have been raising his hand in response to the question. It’s possible he was merely performing his usual, periodic test of which way the wind is blowing.
Romney is slick as a snake oil salesman. They are all politicians but this man is slime.
I think it is comical he is even trying to run.
Doesn’t “Mitt Romney says...” mean the same thing as “barf alert”?
ALL politicians lie.
And Republican primary voters want him because they have heard of him. Name ID means everything now.
My guess is that Romney was always Pro-Life but he couldn’t say it publicly while running for public office in Massachusetts.
Pro-Life means you lose in liberal Massachusetts.
People used to say, Why can’t you get over Chappaquiddick? It was umpty-ump years ago!
The answer was: Because he’s still lying about it—right now!
So Romney changed his mind on abortion. Fine (provided you buy his garbled account of his thinking processes). But now he’s lying about it.
Perhaps, which means those who do at least insult God's intelligence; and many politicians who lie go further & manage to also insult many others' intelligence (as the article says: "...he can't resist insulting people's intelligence about his past record when discussing his current position," Antle writes.)
HMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm you are telling a big LIE SIR!!!! OUT OF YOUR OWN WORDS!!!!!...why don’t you watch your OWN VIDEO!!!!!!!
Then why does he often clearly state that he was Pro choice? Why did he create the myth of Reagan being "adamantly pr-choice" as an explanation for his own conversion?
How could he so sincerely and in such convincing detail describe his personal adoption of the proabortion view in 1970? Romney has described the actual conversion epiphany that he had at the end of 2004, how could there have been a conversion if he was already pro life?
Why was Romney so aggressively pro abortion, supporting and funding and voting for and even doing fund raisers for pro-abortion Democrats in their races against Republicans, Why did Romney do fund raising for Planned Parenthood?
Spin and twist his words all you like, the fact remains that he has never denied having been pro-choice at one time.
Yes, he changed his mind. So what? We ought to welcome converts to our cause, not shun them.
Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!
It should be obvious that had Romney run for Governor of a conservative state like Utah, he would have been running as a pro-life candidate. As for why is he lying about it, “That’s my story and I’m sticking with it.”
Don’t you just love a guy who can lie with a straight face and a big toothy smile? Nice hair too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.