Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not Nominate the Next Reagan in 2012?
American Thinker ^ | Feb. 27, 2010 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 03/04/2010 8:32:42 AM PST by pkajj

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: carton253

If we were choosing a president, style would matter less. We are choosing a candidate, one who has to win the general election for our choice to matter. It’s a sad fact, but I don’t think it’s sad thinking to recognize that reality.

Given a choice of Governor Palin (assuming we believe she could be a great president and could win in 2012), and Fred Thompson (assuming we believed he could be even better in office but could not win an election), I think the ability to win is an important consideration although not the only consideration. We tried Barry Goldwater in 1964, and that didn’t work out.


41 posted on 03/04/2010 9:18:58 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Try to ZZZZZZ through this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUn8GSbUl_4&feature=related

Actually, just go to YouTube and search for Fred Thompson debates.

He makes the rest of them look like kindergartners.


42 posted on 03/04/2010 9:23:37 AM PST by Jedidah (Character, courage, common sense are more important than issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

From the article: “Sarah Palin, rightly beloved by nearly all conservatives for her honesty, her advocacy, and her spunk, will figure into any list of candidates.”

Right now, Palin looks stilted and scripted when she appears in public, probably because she’s been to so many book signings and appeared on so many talk shows. I think she’s trying to get through the next year or so of interviews without giving the liberal press too much new material with which to attack her.

That said, there’s no question in my mind that she would surround herself with principled conservatives if elected president and that the U.S. would be in far better hands than it is now. Principles count, and hers align with mine, probably more so than with any other candidate right now. Certainly more so than a Romney, McCain or even Thompson.

(And then there’s the fun we would have watching the left deal with the Republican Party voting in the first female President.)


43 posted on 03/04/2010 9:24:42 AM PST by Norseman (Term Limits: 8 years is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Nope. I campaigned for Fred Thompson. Sent him money and made calls from home. I was a lot more enthussiastic about a President Fred Thompson then Fred Thompson was! I have come to the reluctant conclusion that Fred never intended to win the nomination he was in only as a stalking horse for John McCain. He and Huckabee played their parts well. They split the conservative vote so the RINOS had the race to themselves. Won’t fall for that again.


44 posted on 03/04/2010 9:25:17 AM PST by pgkdan (I miss Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
So, for you, you may agree with a candidate 95% of the time, but if you don't think he can be elected, you will gladly move to the stylistic candidate you agree with 75%.

If that happens, don't bellyache when that candidate doesn't govern like you believe a "conservative" should. That candidate didn't compromise: you did!!!

45 posted on 03/04/2010 9:25:56 AM PST by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
Because the majority of people think she is not qualified, and after watching what has happened with the current unqualified occupant of the white house, I don't think the public is going to be in the mood for on the job training with the next president.

Plus with her on the bottom, we could run the table for the next 16 years.

46 posted on 03/04/2010 9:26:27 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

He won’t run; he doesn’t want the job; he’s too smart and he knows the truth. The truth is that regardless of who sits in the oval office, they are only a mere puppet to the powers that be behind the scenes and the script will be played out regardless.


47 posted on 03/04/2010 9:26:45 AM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild
How about Michelle Bachmann? She's like Sarah Palin, but without the baggage (Levi).
48 posted on 03/04/2010 9:27:00 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!!! Welcome to our Totalitarian world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Once shame on you, twice, shame on me. No thanks.

Good call Hand.

Like another poster I also worry about his closeness to McCain. You lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

49 posted on 03/04/2010 9:27:09 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Fred’s a great guy... but he got buried last time around in the primaries, what makes you think he would do better the 2nd time around?


50 posted on 03/04/2010 9:28:23 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

?????

I like Fred and was disappointed he didn’t run last time around.

His friendship with that monster John McCain may have been the reason.

As for now, he’s too old.

We lost the youth vote to the Obamamessiah. We need someone more youthful in appearance.


51 posted on 03/04/2010 9:29:36 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

I think Thompson (actually, both Fred and Jeri) is probably going to wind up being a key player on Palin’s team. I think they’re going to be power-brokers this time around, not running Fred himself for the office.


52 posted on 03/04/2010 9:29:52 AM PST by kevkrom (Obama's Waterloo: a "hockey mom" with a laptop and a Facebook account)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

TOO OLD!!! TOO TIRED!!!!!.

His voice puts me to sleep.

Check out Jim DeMint. He’s GREAT!!!


53 posted on 03/04/2010 9:30:26 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

My money is on the beauty pageant winner. Winning the presidency will seem like a cakewalk compared to those competitions. Sarah Palin knows how to play to win. I mean, she beat a Republican incumbent governor in the primary.


54 posted on 03/04/2010 9:32:07 AM PST by sportutegrl (VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

DeMint 2012.


55 posted on 03/04/2010 9:35:39 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carton253
So, why not nominate and elect the best conservative we can for 2012 and not 1980? Hopefully, the conservative will run...because, in the end, we can only vote for those conservatives that take up the challenge and run for office.

Because Romney wants us to have a bunch of conservatives trying to get the nomination so he can split the conservative vote and win with 30% of the electorate. If he gets all the RINO vote and the crossover votes in the states with open primaries, we'll again be in another "Hold your nose" election where we get to pick between two liberals.

We conservatives need to get our collective act together and pick ONE good conservative to represent us.

56 posted on 03/04/2010 9:37:14 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Mike Pence, too.


57 posted on 03/04/2010 9:39:35 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

Two words:

Paul Ryan.


58 posted on 03/04/2010 9:41:39 AM PST by ILikeBourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pkajj
If each one of us emulated Ronald Reagan.

The dems would have an absolute cow.

59 posted on 03/04/2010 9:42:38 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILikeBourbon
Paul Ryan.

Those could be the right two words. I could live with it.

60 posted on 03/04/2010 9:43:57 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson