Posted on 02/21/2010 12:49:35 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks.
You’re welcome...
And I know that it’s the same thing that has been said for several years now, and posted over and over again — but, the amazing thing to me is that someone new sees it all the time, in a different thread (and tells me that... )... :-)
So, I always figure it’s worth it and I appreciate the positive remark...
But once CFCs were off the table, they boosted the theoretical feedback effects on just one of the gases tracked in AR1—CO2, in order to keep the expected human-induced warming high enough to still be a problem.
CO2 has carried the argument ever since even though we've largely eliminated a class of gases that were previously thought to be responsible for half the expected warming.
There are a lot of people look at this site.
So, what do I do with the can of Freon-12 I still have in my garage?
YEP!
“Whom God would destroy, He first makes mad.”
The madness is all about us (except, of course, for thee and me).
The solution to some of these problems is to BAN all research coming out of Kalifornia.
Leaded Gasoline came before CFCs. The left has had this mapped out for a long, long time.
I think the proper word here would be hypothesis, not theory. Typically, a theory is formulated on the basis of a body of well-tested evidence. A hypothesis is a testable supposition based on observation. The idea of science is to develop a logical hypothesis, its companion null hypothesis, and to set about trying to disprove the hypothesis. Neither the idea of CFC-mediated ozone layer destruction nor anthropogenic climate change have been shown to withstand rigorous experimental challenge. Thus, they remain hypotheses.
Good article. Ill save this one for later :o)
I wish a more reputable news org would publish articles like this. Its hard to spread the news when your source is “American Thinker” or “Pajama News” or whatever.
They tend to support these scams....
It was started by Enron.
A couple of years ago a letter was very quietly released by a European group that studies ozone depletion. The researcher admitted that the formulae used to estimate the contribution of CFC’s to depletion vastly overrated the contribution of CFC’s. They cannot now say that CFC’s are the problem. Looked like a precursor to blaming global warming.
see post 10 above
Hmmm........that is “eggsackley” what I thought. From now on, when I hear someone yammering about CO2 I will ask them where it comes from, why it’s dangerous, etc.
I am so sick of this fraud.
Thank you.
Signing the Montreal Treaty was not one of Reagan’s finer moments.
The whole thing was nothing other a $$$$$$$ grab
When did that change? Are they maybe getting dumb people to confuse carbon DIoxide with carbon MONoxide?
It changed when this moron, and all his followers who've never taken a science class, came along.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.