Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scalia: No to secession
http://www.politico.com ^ | February 16, 2010 | Ben Smith

Posted on 02/17/2010 9:28:36 AM PST by Para-Ord.45

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last
To: Ditto

Please see posts #148 and 149


161 posted on 02/18/2010 6:23:06 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
Then why didn't those learned souls who wrote the document simply say that it is prohibited? Do you suppose that they were incapable of doing so? Or is it possible, as I believe it to be, that they specifically chose not to include it in their list of items prohibited to the states because they wanted those free and independent states who comprised the union to have a final and complete check on the government they were creating?

I think it's more ridiculous to believe that the Founders would go to lenghts to ensure that states could not take steps that might harm other states, and then leave permission for the ultimate negative act assumed. But that's just me. I'm not blessed with your...creative imagination.

162 posted on 02/18/2010 6:26:07 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
That is exactly what I am saying!

Then you would agree that the U.S. Air Force is an illegal, unconstitutional organization and must be disbanded or folded back into the Army immediately. Right?

163 posted on 02/18/2010 6:27:03 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Then you would agree that the U.S. Air Force is an illegal, unconstitutional organization and must be disbanded or folded back into the Army immediately. Right?

Not necessarily. You figure out why and tear you own straw man down.

164 posted on 02/18/2010 6:37:25 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I'm not blessed with your...creative imagination.

Let's see now! I'm the one who is arguing for the plain language of the Constitution and nothing more but, according to you, I'M the one with a creative imagination!

LOL! I guess you got me there < /sarcasm >

165 posted on 02/18/2010 6:41:19 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
Not necessarily. You figure out why and tear you own straw man down.

Not necessarily? You said that there were no implied powers. The Constitution in Article I Section 8 specifically authorizes funding a branch of the military called an Army and a branch called a Navy. It does not specifically authorize an Air Force. Now, Article I Section 8 does say that Congress shall have the power to provide for the common defense, and one might imply in that the power to establish however many different branches of the military necessary to accomplish that. But as you told us earlier, there are no implied powers only specifically defined ones. So by all means tell us how an Air Force can exist without the specificConstitutional authority to fund one?

166 posted on 02/18/2010 6:45:56 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Bigun

“...and then leave permission for the ultimate negative act assumed.”

By ultimate negative act you mean, the unstated permission to destroy states and their people who peacefully quit the union without malice or offensive threat.

Yeah. That is ridiculous.

You finally got one right.

(Here kitty, kitty. Time for another smack down.)


167 posted on 02/18/2010 6:50:53 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
I'm the one who is arguing for the plain language of the Constitution and nothing more but, according to you, I'M the one with a creative imagination!

No, you're the one contradicting yourself.

True or false: Homeland Security, NASA, Federal Aviation Administrtion, and Veterans Affairs are only a few examples of the many unconstitutional departments and agencies that should be eliminated since they are not specifically authorized by the Constitution.

168 posted on 02/18/2010 6:54:36 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
You finally got one right.

And we're all holding out hope that someday you will get something right, too. Though I must admit that hope is fading fast.

169 posted on 02/18/2010 6:56:08 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; Bigun

Seriously. Can’t you make up better come backs than the Pee Wee Herman, “I know you are, but what am I?”

Here’s a thought...address the point I made. Oh, wait, I guess even you get tired of getting bitch slapped all the time.

Bigun: Hehehehehe... see I’ve got him trained. He can’t stand it. Now watch him get mad and stamp his feet.


170 posted on 02/18/2010 7:07:24 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
I will note that what IS plainly written there was completely overlooked by your pal Lincoln and his sock puppet congress when the state of West Virginia was formed.

You are also incorrect on that point as well. Read the history and you will see that they precisely followed the letter of the Constitution in creating the state of West Virginia.

As to not specifically mentioning secession in the Constitution, where specifically does it mention say the United States Air Force?

171 posted on 02/18/2010 7:46:10 AM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Seriously. Can’t you make up better come backs than the Pee Wee Herman, “I know you are, but what am I?”

Certainly. But I'm lowering myself to your level.

172 posted on 02/18/2010 7:56:50 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

LOL!

And your mama wears combat boots.

LMAO..... How old ARE you, dude?


173 posted on 02/18/2010 8:00:09 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

I seem to hear a distinct echo in here!

Be careful when he turns a corner real fast!


174 posted on 02/18/2010 9:07:17 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

???? He who?


175 posted on 02/18/2010 10:27:49 AM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
...the whole nation exiles its weirdos to California, so don't blame us native conservatives when it comes back to bite. We used to be a Republican state, and people like Waxman were unelectable. We just assume you all keep your miscreants - Pelosi is from Maryland for instance and Boxer is from New York.
176 posted on 02/18/2010 11:25:08 AM PST by americanophile (Good luck Team USA! Bring home the gold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Texas walked out and left responsibility for debt and national obligations to the remaining states, and with every piece of federal property it could get its hands on.

Fair point. TX could claim a per-capita share of the national debt and full ownership of (formerly) federal property within state boundaries, and they could give the Feds the option of attempting to force them to stay but charging all war costs against the TX share of the national debt if there is a war and (as is likely based on relative motivation) TX wins. I don't think Obama has the guts to initiate a war, not even against Americans, even though he doesn't identify with us.

177 posted on 02/18/2010 5:23:13 PM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson