Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taliban using human shields
Yahoo News ^ | 2/17/2010 | AP via Yahoo news

Posted on 02/16/2010 11:40:54 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Irenic

“Shouldn’t those human shields have left the area? They were warned, no?”

In previous battles the civilians were urged to leave the area. For some reason this time they were urged to stay put.


21 posted on 02/17/2010 3:58:07 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Not the first Islamoslime to do so.

The Marines used to talk about the “Somali foxholes”. The “brave” Somali warriors would shot from between the legs of a woman, preferably holding a child, knowing out troops couldn’t return fire.


22 posted on 02/17/2010 4:00:32 AM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Taliban using human shields

Shocking! Gasp!!!


23 posted on 02/17/2010 5:37:55 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
This may sound cruel but -- screw em. Civilians in a War Zone = Collateral Damage.

After a dozen or so 'Human Shields' are killed along with the Taliban, they'll see its a useless tactic and stop. But as long as we hold fire they'll continue to use them.

Or, to be humane -- have more Marine Scout-Sniper Teams in the field. They can put a round in a Taliban's skull without any problem or injury to the 'shield'. Seeing this the Taliban would also stop using 'human shields'.

24 posted on 02/17/2010 5:49:53 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A. Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Killing civilians isn’t the answer, leave that to the Taliban. Snipers are the answer and I’m sure they are getting quite a workout.


25 posted on 02/17/2010 6:03:09 AM PST by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Military policy and ROE SHOULD be “If you are between us, and someone we want to kill or something we want to destroy, then you are going to die. And its your fault.”
Also, we should make a deliberate attempt to kill anyone who volunteers to be a human shields, then send the bill for the ammo or ordnance to the family.


26 posted on 02/17/2010 6:04:44 AM PST by Little Ray (Madame President sounds really good to me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; LeoWindhorse

How about rusty knives?


27 posted on 02/17/2010 6:11:19 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Ofcourse they are.
McChrystal has given a no shoot order if civis are in danger.

all they have to do is throw a couple of civis in the crowd and our Soldiers hands are tied.

If civis are in a group of terrorists they should be considered collaborators not innocents.


28 posted on 02/17/2010 6:24:23 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

>at the mercy of the townspeople , who are themselves supplied
with new kitchen knives

I would only suggest that they use short, dull xacto blades dipped in pig feces.


29 posted on 02/17/2010 6:49:25 AM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: east1234
*** Killing civilians isn’t the answer, leave that to the Taliban ***

I didn't mean to intentionally target civilians. Like attacking a village in force that's suspected of being a Taliban stronghold.

But if civilians are being used as shields by the Taliban during a firefight or ambush and you have to take both out to save yourself, your unit, or to achieve your mission then that's the way it goes. And when the Taliban realize that their shield tactic is failing they'll stop using it.

The Taliban are following Sun Tzu and The Art of War, while we're following the tactics of the Redcoats in 1776. And Sun Tzu has never been wrong, not in 2,500 years.

30 posted on 02/17/2010 9:10:51 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A. Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

It’s funny how AP and the media only discover that the Taliban are using ‘human shields’ now to explain ‘civilian’ deaths. During the Bush years, they just did not seem to think this was occuring. Instead, every civilian death was proudly reported on as US military failure.


31 posted on 02/17/2010 9:31:12 AM PST by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

If they were to get the idea that the tactic did not work, they would switch to another tactic.


32 posted on 02/17/2010 9:34:29 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove


Taliban using human shields

I don’t know how to break this to “Yahoo News”.
This is NOT news to anybody that’s have a pulse...
since the First Gulf War.
Way back in approx. 1991.

At the same time, I do appreciate “Yahoo News” reminding at least a
few of my fellow citizens that the Taliban/Jihadists have no problem
at using innocent victims to prosecute their dirty wars.


33 posted on 02/17/2010 9:39:16 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Typical of terrorist and terrorist related groups....Taliban is no different.


34 posted on 02/17/2010 9:42:54 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Can we please get some photos or something of this? Something to shove up MSNBC douchebag noses when they decry the “fruitless” war on terror?


35 posted on 02/17/2010 10:17:26 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Wait a minute. If that “hayfield” belongs to some opium cartel, that means very deep pockets. Our class action lawyers will be smelling that smoke from the burning poppy fields all the way from New York.


36 posted on 02/17/2010 10:06:27 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Sounds good to me. As long as it’s long, slow, and painful. I wouldn’t hurt a fly. But muslim terrorists are beneath insects as far as I’m concerned!


37 posted on 02/18/2010 1:33:56 AM PST by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: haroldeveryman

Yea - soon we’ll be hearing about lawyers screaming “CASH! CASH! CASH!” on Afghani TV.


38 posted on 02/18/2010 3:12:03 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson