Skip to comments.
Mohawk Community Evicts Non-Natives Over Concerns About Too Many ‘White Residents’ (video report)
CBC ^
| Feb. 7, 2010
Posted on 02/07/2010 12:00:07 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
To: BykrBayb
81
posted on
02/07/2010 6:54:04 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: BykrBayb
82
posted on
02/07/2010 6:54:32 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: BykrBayb
83
posted on
02/07/2010 6:54:52 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: BykrBayb
84
posted on
02/07/2010 6:55:17 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: BykrBayb
85
posted on
02/07/2010 6:55:23 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: BykrBayb
Newbie, too. Impending zotting?
86
posted on
02/07/2010 6:57:40 PM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(No Representation without Taxation!)
To: Georgia1
87
posted on
02/07/2010 6:57:40 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: FreedomPoster
Maybe not. Probably just poor posting skills.
88
posted on
02/07/2010 6:58:20 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
89
posted on
02/07/2010 7:03:03 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: Rebelbase
90
posted on
02/07/2010 7:03:36 PM PST
by
Georgia1
To: Georgia1
</html lesson #1>
91
posted on
02/07/2010 7:05:52 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: packrat35
I’ll have to disagree with you on that point. An owner of private property is allowed to restrict access in any way he wants. In contrast to the owner of a public business (let’s say something like a gas station), private property can be restricted. I can let people onto my private property (or not) at my sole discretion.
To: blau993
in addition it is illegal.
In some communities it is even illegal to have large “for sale” signs in order to prevent “white flight”.
Advertising is not allowed to show anything that would imply race favored neighborhoods.
There are also limitations on indian land in certain areas, there is no carte blanch to be racist.
93
posted on
02/07/2010 7:13:32 PM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: metmom
Friends of mine live right by the reservation in Nedrow, so I know of what you speak. A friend of theirs is an Onondaga and married a white woman, so he does not live on the reservation.
Regarding the sovereign nation thing, I'd say they are more self-sufficient than the U.S. We rely on China for just about everything and I certainly don't feel independent living under Republicrat rule. But I do see your point, I'd expect them to be a bit more independent. At least the Oneida's had the moxie to open Turning Stone.
To: Panzerfaust
I did not say I agree with it, only that it would be acted upon. Many mens only groups, although private have been forced to let in women.
95
posted on
02/07/2010 8:05:21 PM PST
by
packrat35
(Democrat Healthcare is a 9-11 Attack on the Constitution)
To: Georgia1
Been there, done that been done to, too.
96
posted on
02/07/2010 9:38:12 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(I think not, therefore I don't exist!)
To: BykrBayb; Georgia1; ApplegateRanch; Rebelbase
A sarcasm tag is also used to show that the poster understands that some people are too ignorant to know that there really are people out there who believe the ridiculous things they post.A sarcasm tag is essential for someone until they've established a posting history. Being on FR for less than two months isn't enough time.
And before Georgia1 gets his panties in a wad about being treated like the noob that he is, I've seen far too many noobs who are DU suicide runs post comments just like that and get zotted for it.
Don't like it, G1? Get over it. That's life.....
97
posted on
02/08/2010 5:12:00 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
"It's nothing new to anybody," said Grand Chief Mike Delisle.
"[Anyone] who's saying, 'well, I never heard of this, it's racist' or what have you, It's been a custom in Kahnawake since time immemorial." Not enough buffalo to go around this year?
To: metmom
I'm a female Cambodian refugee who received US citizenship last year and although I don't know all the nuances and pecker order this blog requires are you saying that the people with the most posts are superior and can look down the nose at newcomers to their blog (country). This doesn't seem like how I was taught at the classes to get citizenship. They taught the Constitution and Bill of Rights along with reference materials from the Federalist Papers doesn't grant equality but by “Being” we ARE equal. Quotas and numbers of posts to establish a rank-ing doesn't sound like the America our Professor was so emotional about. Is this blog the norm for all Constitutionalists and Conservative peoples. Please advise proper pecker order protocols. Is this a /s because I'm confused as I ACED my test to stay here. PS I'll put my picture up too if that is the problem you're having with me. Thank you.
99
posted on
02/08/2010 5:37:13 AM PST
by
Georgia1
To: Georgia1
I couldn’t find the place where my picture goes even though it is a little old. My profile didn’t have a place either. And the SEARCH didn’t locate it also. I’ll try again later.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson