Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HI Attorney General’s office refuses to corroborate Obama’s HI Birth
THE POST AND EMAIL ^ | Feb. 2, 2010 | John Charlton

Posted on 02/04/2010 3:37:43 AM PST by 1234

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: old curmudgeon

I quoted you from your post #55 ... how ancient are you, anyway?


61 posted on 02/04/2010 10:54:41 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Are you telling me that the black vote would vote for Hillary over Obummer, the Marxist now posing as a Fascist? I doubt that. old curmudgeon You may need some help understand the following, which is a repeat of the comment you flipped 180 degrees in order to attack my post:
“... had the black vote stayed home in 2008, which they surely would have done had Hillary taken the nomination based upon exposing Barry’s ineligibility.”

Other than that, is there something being put in your apple sauce and you just failed to put a “not” in your twisted rendering of the meaning of what I wrote?


Since mine was a direct quote of your post, I believe it is you that have difficulties.

In addition, I asked you directly whether I understood your post correctly.

A reasonable person would have replied with an explanation that my interpretation was correct or if incorrect, why it was not correct.

Perhaps you should determine whether you can handle your sauce rather than questioning the contents of mine.


62 posted on 02/05/2010 6:29:56 AM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Correction:

The following should not have been in my last post. I did not include a direct quote in #55. However, this error does not change the meaning of any of my posts.


63 posted on 02/05/2010 6:35:08 AM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: All

I believe as barry hussein continues to TANK, we will soon see a stealth birther movement from the Left.


64 posted on 02/05/2010 6:53:19 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

We already have leftists agitprops working the birther threads. Short hop to what you suggest. Just look at the poor but determined effort by the old cur above, to twist another’s post and fabricate an argument with the poorly constructed strawman it sought to erect.


65 posted on 02/05/2010 7:23:36 AM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
"...all it takes is one small crack to break the dam...."


66 posted on 02/05/2010 7:31:34 AM PST by NCC-1701 (ZEROs FAVORITE SONG -- I, ME, MINE -- BY THE BEATLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

I have a different reason why Hillary did not blow the whistle about BHO’s eligibility. The same forces that raised BHO to presidential level and brought McCain from the bottom of the Republican pile were the same forces that brought Bill Clinton out of the shadows for POTUSA. These forces just told Hillary to shut up because they had a new carrier.The only dot in this scenario is who are the ‘forces’. Soros could be one, Rockefellers could be another. Who else? This sure makes for a lot of smoke.


67 posted on 02/05/2010 8:05:35 AM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers

I would not doubt that.

She is as mercenary as anyone in DC, so I suspect she saw an opportunity.

Just what that opportunity was is not yet known, but as in almost all things it will be known eventually.


68 posted on 02/05/2010 8:11:19 AM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Orly’s Quo Warranto is based on, among other facts, the basic fact that by his own admission his father was a Kenyan and subject to British rule he is not a natural born citizen as defined in the Law of Nations and as required by the Constitution.


69 posted on 02/05/2010 8:17:33 AM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

I have a different reason why Hillary did not blow the whistle about BHO’s eligibility. The same forces that raised BHO to presidential level and brought McCain from the bottom of the Republican pile were the same forces that brought Bill Clinton out of the shadows for POTUSA. These forces just told Hillary to shut up because they had a new carrier.The only dot in this scenario is who are the ‘forces’. Soros could be one, Rockefellers could be another. Who else? This sure makes for a lot of smoke.


70 posted on 02/05/2010 8:19:32 AM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers

Orly’s Quo Warranto is based on, among other facts, the basic fact that by his own admission his father was a Kenyan and subject to British rule he is not a natural born citizen as defined in the Law of Nations and as required by the Constitution.


However the 21st President of the United States Chester A. Arthur’s father, William Arthur was born in Cullybackey, Ballymena, Ireland.


71 posted on 02/05/2010 11:36:39 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

True about Arthur,but there is more to that part of history. Arthur became POTUSA after Garfield was asassinated. Garfield as far as I know had parents who were both citizenS and was born in Ohio and thereby met all Constitutional requirerments. There was political friction between Garfield and Arthur supporters with apparently a lot of “dirty tricks’ that ended in Garfields demise. Arthur’s father was also into Canada and the USA and history proves people will sneak around or usurp the Constitution: but the Constitution was not changed or modified for Arthur or BHO.


72 posted on 02/05/2010 3:38:40 PM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers

True about Arthur,but there is more to that part of history. Arthur became POTUSA after Garfield was asassinated. Garfield as far as I know had parents who were both citizenS and was born in Ohio and thereby met all Constitutional requirerments. There was political friction between Garfield and Arthur supporters with apparently a lot of “dirty tricks’ that ended in Garfields demise. Arthur’s father was also into Canada and the USA and history proves people will sneak around or usurp the Constitution: but the Constitution was not changed or modified for Arthur or BHO.


The same constitutional eligibility requirement in Article 2, Section 1 that applies to presidents also applies to Vice Presidents.
The Constitution does not define who is a natural born citizen but the 14th Amendment clearly identifies two categories of citizenship for “ALL” Americans: born citizens and naturalized citizens.


73 posted on 02/05/2010 4:01:06 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

You seem to me to read that Amendment 14 Section 1 cancels out the word ‘natural’ as applied to the Article II requirement for ‘natural born citizen’. I don’t believe this happened and there are others that have said there are two classes of citizens in the Constitution whether it hurts our sensitivity or not 1) there is a natural born citizen with birth as defined in the Law of Nations and 2) there are ordinary citizens such as born in the US or naturalized in the US. One can easily discern that the 14th amendment was made to make certain of the #2 kind of citizen without any other chacterization but it did not remove the right to be a natural born citizen.
This was of interest to me because neither my brother who was killed on Okinawa nor I also a WWII vet were eligible for POTUSA because neither though born in the mid-west was born of citizens. We were just citizens and proud of that. Our mother was natualized later in life, became an ordinary citizen and was also proud of that.


74 posted on 02/05/2010 9:13:59 PM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers

You seem to me to read that Amendment 14 Section 1 cancels out the word ‘natural’ as applied to the Article II requirement for ‘natural born citizen’. I don’t believe this happened and there are others that have said there are two classes of citizens in the Constitution whether it hurts our sensitivity or not 1) there is a natural born citizen with birth as defined in the Law of Nations and 2) there are ordinary citizens such as born in the US or naturalized in the US. One can easily discern that the 14th amendment was made to make certain of the #2 kind of citizen without any other chacterization but it did not remove the right to be a natural born citizen.
This was of interest to me because neither my brother who was killed on Okinawa nor I also a WWII vet were eligible for POTUSA because neither though born in the mid-west was born of citizens. We were just citizens and proud of that. Our mother was natualized later in life, became an ordinary citizen and was also proud of that.


I’m going on historical precedent. After the passage of the 14th Amendment, Chester A. Arthur became Vice President then 21st President of the United States and his father was born in Ireland.
I know of only one Obama eligibility lawsuit that has been decided on the basis of Obama’s father not being a US citizen. That lawsuit was in Indiana (Ankeny et. al. V Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana). The original trial court and the Indiana Court of Appeals dismissed the suit and ruled that Obama’s father’s nationality had no bearing on his status as a natural born citizen. Only time will tell whether those decisions will be appealed and reversed by other, higher courts.


75 posted on 02/06/2010 4:54:37 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I found the Indiana case you cited and my reading is somewhat different than dismissal of facts of eligibility. Apparently the courts ruled that because the filing was after the congressional approval it is too late to make a filing which might have and should have been done at an earlier stage of the election.The courts said congress has to act now. However, Quo Warranto pleadings apparently do apply after someone is in office by usurpation and it will be interesting to see if the courts dismiss these which can present meritorious facts.


76 posted on 02/06/2010 10:55:21 PM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers

Did you read the decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals’ Section B entitled “Native Born Citizen”?


77 posted on 02/07/2010 10:30:47 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson