Skip to comments.
Nature's hot green quantum computers revealed
New Scientist ^
| 03 February 2010
| Kate McAlpine
Posted on 02/03/2010 4:47:15 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Click on the links at the source. A new window opens with the first abstract and then the others in succession as the other links are clicked.
1
posted on
02/03/2010 4:47:16 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Earthshattering news in fact. Next someone pulls strands of DNA from a banana peel to build a super computer.
Actually, the teeny-tiny little quantum computers are not exactly unexpected. They had to be inserted to make it possible for life to sustain itself in the very hostile Earth environment.
2
posted on
02/03/2010 4:54:27 PM PST
by
muawiyah
("Git Out The Way")
To: neverdem
I think this is fascinating news.
3
posted on
02/03/2010 4:58:37 PM PST
by
J Edgar
To: neverdem
I read a book about evolution relying on quantum computation a few years back --
Quantum Evolution
Probably a lot more things utilize this.
4
posted on
02/03/2010 5:05:47 PM PST
by
sigSEGV
To: neverdem
From the Article: “The hope is that quantum coherence could be used to make solar cells more efficient.”
That may indeed work, I’ve estimated that solar cells would have to be 85 to 90+% efficient to be viable for mass-solar electric. Considering we recently broke 20%, IIRC, then this may be a good, and possibly big, leap toward that level of efficiency.
5
posted on
02/03/2010 5:11:41 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: neverdem
Hope he’s right. But the last time chemists encroached into the world of physics, it didn’t turn out very well. That was called cold fusion.
6
posted on
02/03/2010 5:15:17 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: neverdem
There has been talk in recent years that consciousness itself may be quantum in nature, specifically normal modes of bose-einstein condensates on a biological substrate. This discovery may in fact be evidence in that direction.
7
posted on
02/03/2010 5:19:38 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: LibWhacker
the last time chemists encroached into the world of physics...
You're not familiar with the rather well developed discipline of quantum chemistry? Today's chemists are specialized physicists, not the wet experimental alchemists of yesteryear.
8
posted on
02/03/2010 5:22:43 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: neverdem
God is a friggin Genius...
9
posted on
02/03/2010 5:54:35 PM PST
by
Paradox
(ObamaCare = Logan's Run ; There is no Sanctuary!)
To: OneWingedShark
Thanks for reminding me about the solar cells.
10
posted on
02/03/2010 5:57:55 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: SpaceBar
There has been talk in recent years that consciousness itself may be quantum in nature, specifically normal modes of bose-einstein condensates on a biological substrate. Translation?
11
posted on
02/03/2010 6:00:38 PM PST
by
Ken H
(Debt free is the way to be)
To: Paradox
>God is a friggin Genius...
Yep!
12
posted on
02/03/2010 6:01:24 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Ken H
Wave-like character of an exotic condensed phase of matter that behaves as a large coherent quantum state, usually only observed at extremely low (cold) energies and controlled laboratory conditions.
13
posted on
02/03/2010 6:10:27 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: Ken H
Translation?That's in the realm of theoretical physics and states of matter found in around the temperature near absolute zero and particles sought in experimental particle colliders.
14
posted on
02/03/2010 6:12:34 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: SpaceBar; neverdem
Are they hypothesizing that such a coherency - whether in biological brains or the conditions you described - is what produces consciousness?
Taking it a step further, would such a coherency necessarily require matter?
15
posted on
02/03/2010 7:24:46 PM PST
by
Ken H
(Debt free is the way to be)
To: Ken H
In short, yeah, that's what has been conjectured. The argument being that consciousness would require a complexity, speed, and macro-coherence not realizable using the standard synapse-neurotransmitter-axion model which is strictly classical. As for the non-substrate model, I haven't heard that discussed directly, but it adds an intriguing dimension to say the least.
16
posted on
02/03/2010 7:46:57 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
No, you’re right. I don’t know anything about it. As I say, I hope he’s on to something. Perhaps cold fusion and other premature eureka moments have made me too suspicious in my old age.
Love the discussion of quantum consciousness, btw. I had heard of that before and your comment prompted me to Google it to learn more. Fascinating stuff.
17
posted on
02/03/2010 8:55:32 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: SpaceBar
Interesting stuff. Too bad I'm not some eccentric old billionaire. I'd set up my own institute to study such things.
18
posted on
02/03/2010 8:56:21 PM PST
by
Ken H
(Debt free is the way to be)
To: LibWhacker
Well don’t be too humbled, it’s one of the most demanding disciplines in the hard sciences. The old methods of chemistry treating atoms as hard spheres with valence charges and so forth is so 19’th century. Now they build up molecules from first principles using techniques called generically ab-initio methods which includes such techniques as the Hartree-Fock method which builds up the quantum wavefunction first of atoms then molecules from discrete elementary quantum wavefunctions representing electrons and protons. As the molecule is built up its electrical and chemical properies such as bond lengths and energies, symmetry, vibrational modes, etc become apparent not through experimentation and wet analytical methods but through brute computation. Such methods are not trivial and generally require a lot of computing power, but there are software packages that can do it on a PC. GAMESS (General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System) is a popular package with a big following. Chemists who use these techniques are really physicists specializing in chemistry. Fascinating stuff really.
19
posted on
02/03/2010 9:21:20 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
20
posted on
02/03/2010 10:34:56 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson