Skip to comments.
I shot US abortion doctor to protect children, Scott Roeder tells court
Guardian ^
| 28 January 2010
| Ed Pilkington
Posted on 01/28/2010 12:16:12 PM PST by Ben Mugged
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 421 next last
To: patton; OldDeckHand
What do you do?
You can bet OldDeckHand and his "LAW" would be after me, because the life of my child is worth more than my own. It may cost me a few years in prison for kidnapping, but at least my child would've been spared a grisly death.
(At least I hope I'd be man enough at 16 to stand up against OldDeckHand's precious "LAW" when it threatens my child's life.)
341
posted on
01/28/2010 6:00:09 PM PST
by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
To: LearsFool; OldDeckHand
I think that you are not alone.
342
posted on
01/28/2010 6:02:19 PM PST
by
patton
(Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
To: OldDeckHand
When Roe is eventually overturned by a different Supreme Court decision...
And just how many kids have to die between now and then? How many little babies will you sacrifice to your almighty "LAW"?
My FRiend, for all your brains you still haven't the slightest clue what the purpose of law is.
343
posted on
01/28/2010 6:04:44 PM PST
by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
To: Joe 6-pack
They were talking about that earlier on Foxnews with Judge Napalitano. He basically said that if he had killed him while he was preforming an abortion he’d have been in a better place using this law than he was by following him to church to do it.
To: chris_bdba
...especially since many of Tiller’s abortions seem to have been illegal.
345
posted on
01/28/2010 6:16:16 PM PST
by
patton
(Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
To: Petronski
The high school girl that takes a pill that the nurse gives her can easily convince herself that she hasn’t done anything at all, but the abortionist that stabs the shears through the skull of a half born child knows for sure what he has done.
346
posted on
01/28/2010 6:37:30 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: editor-surveyor
Every abortion is murder.
347
posted on
01/28/2010 7:31:01 PM PST
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: trumandogz; editor-surveyor
I’m not sure what you two are arguing about and did not look but yes the Supreme Court and the US Constitution do differentiate about how folks are killed in determining justice.
For the record I feel no pain over Tiller’s murder and would love to see a Second Degree jury nullification.
So shoot me...(no pun intended)
348
posted on
01/28/2010 7:35:13 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(Good Yankees in Massachusetts, I salute you all from bended knee in appreciation)
To: wardaddy; editor-surveyor
While the SCOTUS may attempt to decide when life begins, it is clear to the vast majority of those of us in the Pro-Life Movement that Life Begins at Conception.
With that being the case, we should not accept, as some here have proposed, the idea that an abortion during the first trimester is acceptable, while it is not acceptable in the third trimester.
349
posted on
01/28/2010 7:53:43 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: trumandogz; wardaddy
"
With that being the case, we should not accept, as some here have proposed, the idea that an abortion during the first trimester is acceptable, while it is not acceptable in the third trimester." You keep propping that strawman up, but really nobody here has made that argument.
You're just covering. Your failure to realize that the multiple brutal murders of half born children requires death is your problem. "He who sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed" And that is exactly what Roeder did, is shed that brutal serial killer's blood.
350
posted on
01/28/2010 8:04:28 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: Petronski
But that isn’t what was in contention.
You’re always way off to the edge of what is being discussed.
351
posted on
01/28/2010 8:06:25 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: editor-surveyor
You may way to check your Post 320 where you said that human life is not discernible during the first trimester. I on the other hand respect human life from the moment of conception.
352
posted on
01/28/2010 8:17:26 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: trumandogz
You may want to check.....
353
posted on
01/28/2010 8:20:24 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: editor-surveyor
But that isnt what was in contention.Of course it is. Every murder is carnage.
354
posted on
01/28/2010 8:48:31 PM PST
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: the invisib1e hand; All
Good point.
The Nebraska doctor that was going to offer abortions opted not to, so I believe the only place you can get them in Wichita now is Planned Parenthood....and only Tiller did late term.
Many babies were saved by this act, though IT WAS WRONG.
If I was on the jury, I would convict the man. He committed murder regardless of the reason. That said, I would be hard pressed to send him to jail for more than a few years.
355
posted on
01/29/2010 8:55:18 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: trumandogz
Killing an abortionist who intends to kill other people’s children is called murder.
Saving your children and killing an intruder in the process is called heroic.
I need to think about this.
356
posted on
01/29/2010 9:05:41 AM PST
by
July4
(Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
To: OldDeckHand; imahawk; Invincibly Ignorant
I suggest you enroll in a local adult education civics class, because you've got a real project ahead of you. Hey, let's make it easy for you there "OldDickHand." The US Consitiution spells out the division of labor among the branches of the US governement. Just show us the place in the US Constitution where the USSC is vested with the responsibility for MAKING law.
We are a representative republic, with laws written by for and of the people.
And then while you're at it, re: abortion: just show us what people supposedly made what law. And if they think they did make law, supply us with the Consitutional rationale for their having done so.
We'll wait.
357
posted on
01/29/2010 9:08:52 AM PST
by
Agamemnon
(Intelligent Design is to evolution what the Swift Boat Vets were to the Kerry campaign)
To: Agamemnon
"Just show us the place in the US Constitution where the USSC is vested with the responsibility for MAKING law." It is an inherent function of the US legal system that ANY precedential decision by the US Supreme Court becomes law. This is a principle that we inherited from the English through our colonial roots. The principle of judicial review was established in 1803 in a case called Marbury v. Madison, a decision that was based in large part on English legal precedent and Federalist No. 78, authored by Alexander Hamilton. Again, this is basic civics 101.
"And then while you're at it, re: abortion: just show us what people supposedly made what law. And if they think they did make law, supply us with the Constitutional rationale for their having done so."
The people elect the President, the President nominates justices to the Supreme Court, and the Senate - elected by the people - approve those appointment through the process of advice and consent, ergo Supreme Court decisions are a representation of the will of the people.
This is America. We don't enact law through popular vote, but through a process of representative government which is an expression of the people's will. That same expression is seen not only in our Executive and Legislative branches, but our Judicial branch as well.
Again, If you can't understand that very elementary principle of governance, I recommend adult education classes - knowledge is power, empower yourself.
To: Ben Mugged; All
Guilty on all counts, jury took only 40 minutes!
359
posted on
01/29/2010 10:27:29 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
But after hearing Roeder testify, District Judge Warren Wilbert ruled that his lawyers failed to show that Tiller posed an imminent threat and the jury could not consider such a verdict. After the Judge's directions there was never another option. After all he confessed.
360
posted on
01/29/2010 10:31:04 AM PST
by
Ben Mugged
(Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 421 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson