Posted on 01/24/2010 10:47:33 PM PST by bruinbirdman
;-)
Ok, so this is how they are going to “create” transitional species. I knew they would think of something sooner or later. BTW, I am not a creationist but I can recognize the BS that many, many evos throw out year after year in order to prove their theory. It is much like the global warming BS.
Yeah, looks like he has acne.
The world is filled with anecdotal information about the enviro whackos just using overwhelming academic numbers to push their political agenda. I'll offer mine.
On a fishing trip in Baja California I met a guy (non academic) who boasted the largest private collection of butterflies in California. He was a true expert. He voluntarily sat on some California endangered species board.
A particular butterfly inhabitated mountains at a particular altitude range. One year they had vanished from their traditional habitat. The board wanted to submit that species to the Feds as endangered.
This private expert noted that they had just gone to a lower altitude because of an inclimate season. They were not endangered.
The board would hear none of it, voted to recommend that it was endangered and forced him off the board.
yitbos
Whether one or three species, looks like evolution to me. Remember ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny if it turns out to be only one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.