Posted on 01/24/2010 6:02:40 AM PST by cycle of discernment
Well, all-knowing Bert, it is wise to pay attention “all-around”. I suggest you do the same.
I do not trust the words of a Saudi billionaire that finances global terror roots...(of course you would call that mere “propaganda”)
Double-speak and sweet deception are two of the most finely honed gifts of the Arabian and Persian empires. They are VERY smart people.
“Despite his disturbing background and connections, Bin Talal has many prominent Americans, both conservative and liberal, snowed”
Since then, Prince Alwaleed’s Kingdom Foundation has given millions of dollars to Muslim charities in the United States,
Our money returning from oil purchases !!!!!!!!!!!!!
I agree. But people will die before Obama is exposed. Look who died in the Clinton administration. Rod Brown, the Fort Marcy park thing. And more. It will not be pretty. But it has to get done. I hope it does. Obama is bought and paid for by Saudi oil money and is a Muslim.
BTW I love this line, “and will ‘Reilly, Hannity and Beck, the Three Mouseketeers, offer any insights to this Horrific Accusation? not to mention Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch too??”
Well .. I have a slightly different take than most.
As a news outlet .. maybe FOX don’t want to stir the pot until they know for sure what’s in it.
By that I mean .. yes, there is a lot of speculation - but not a lot of actual proof .. which is the key.
For a news outlet to speculate on hearsay information, you’re treading water. What if all of Obama’s documents are finally released and there’s nothing to disqualify him ..?? What then ..?? This issue has already made it to the Supreme Court (not sure if that’s a state supreme court or the USSC) .. so let them sort out the information and we can go from there.
If you’ve been on the air whipping the public into a frenzy because there’s a chance the president’s not legally in that position .. You’ll have a lot of egg on your face if he turns out to be legal. And .. Obama already hates FOX, so I would expect he would do whatever he could to shut it down. And .. if you’re a shareholder of Fox News Corp - that prospect is not a good one. This might be the only reason for the caution.
There will be plenty of time to carry the story and expose the President if, in fact, it is finally learned that he’s not here legally. Then .. you have all the stories to cover regarding “impeachment”, “removal from office”, “a new president”, etc.
And .. also remember this .. Obama may have actually been born in HI; but the other documents he’s hiding may reveal that he lied about his status; about his birth; about his nationality or religion in order to get grants and other monies for his education. While that is FRAUD, would it be strong enough evidence to impeach him ..?? Knowing the dems like we do .. you know they would put up a stink if we tried to get Obama out of office - FOR ANY REASON.
And then there’s the worst story of all - WE’RE NOW STUCK WITH BIDEN AS PRESIDENT .. from Marxist to Idiot!
And .. if you don’t agree with me .. that’s okay.
And when Steve Doocy starts blaming the Joooos for tsunamis in Indonesia, then you'll know there is a problem.
But the reason they don't cover the birth certificate story is the same reason they don't run serious stories about the controlled demolition of the twin towers, the missile that hit the Pentagon, GHWBush’s involvement with the Kennedy assassination, etc...
Because they are just too nutty to be given serious attention.
BTW...have you heard about Ellie Light?...disinformation is out there...jusayin’
I forgot to mention. Talal was a guest on Cavuto’s program, and he was totally supportive of Bush’s strong method of handling the terrorists. He stated that the current admin should be strong like Bush.
It was priceless!!!!!!
“They are VERY smart people”
They’re not smart. Their cunning liars. Who would trust one word from a muzzie mouth? Remember their “holy” book condones this type of behavior.
ping to possible Saudi suppressionn of Fox birther coverage
ping to numerous links on Prince Alwaleed...
Maybe a published story like Canada Free Press, would also be good for further information.
But Rush, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Levin and Malkin are currently destroying Obama on the issues with the help of Murcock every day. They are destroying Obama on the issues including hammering Obama’s coddling of Islamist terrorists in civil court, rather than in military tribunals, and Obama’s refusal to describe Islamist terrorism as Islamist. This is hardly kowtowing to any sentiments that Prince Alwaleed might have.
Beck may have unfairly dismissive of “birthers” but he gives the correct answer to the ultimate question of the moment which is “Is it better for Obama to be defeated by exposure and education of the public of his radical progressive, socialist agenda, or to be exposed as being ineligible?”
If SCOTUS ruled tomorrow that Obama was ineligible and removed him, I would do handsprings, but the vast SEIU, ACORN, progressive academic and political power structure would still be intact and able to regenerate...with Hillary!
If you take a close look at the facts presented in the story at your link you will see that the prince owns only 5.7% of NewsCorp, which is hardly enough to exercise any editorial control or give instructions to Murdock. The prince does not even have a seat on the NewsCorp Board of Directors.
On the Newscorp Board are José María Aznar, the former conservative Prime Minister of Spain who was kicked out by craven fearful Spanish voter after Al Qaeda bombed the Madrid trains, and also Viet Dinh, who drafted the US Patriot Act. These folks seem hardly likely to cower before the prince.
See NewCorp 2009 proxy with details on directors beginning page 6:
http://investor.newscorp.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-09-178387
The Prince also took a bath in 2008 on both Citicorp and Newscorp stock and is still underwater bigtime. His $ billions in multinationals vulnerable to terrorist activities and his entire royal family is on the Al Qaeda hit-list. The prince's alleged terrorist ties pertain to Saudi support for Hamas and Hezbollah funding Islamic “charities” which do provide hospitals and schools as well as back-door funding for terrorist activities to “liberate” Palestine from the “Zionist Entity”.
The expansion of ties to Murdock in the story is actually a story of Murdock gaining additional ownership of the prince's media company, not the other way around.
From the story:
“Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of the Saudi king and who was listed last year by Forbes as the world's 22nd richest person, met with News Corp.’s chief executive Rupert Murdoch on Jan. 14 in a meeting that “touched upon future potential alliances with News Corp.,” according to a statement released by his Kingdom Holding Co. late Saturday.
“Media reports have indicated that News Corp, parent to Fox News and Dow Jones & Co., among others, may be thinking of buying a stake in Alwaleed’s Rotana Media Group, which includes a number of satellite channels that air in the Middle East.
“Neither company has commented publicly on the possible deal, but the talks offer an indication yet that such an agreement may yet be in the offing.
“Kingdom Holding's statement said Alwaleed is already the second largest stakeholder in News Corp., with 5.7 percent of the shares of the media company. The stake is held through Kingdom Holding, in which Alwaleed holds a 95 percent stake.
“The investment company has a diverse portfolio, ranging from hotels to shares in Apple, eBay and Citigroup.
“Alwaleed, and the investment firm, were hit hard by the global meltdown.”
Agreed!
I have worked with a lot of Arabs....cunning liars is an understatement. I always knew I was in trouble when I heard this phrase “Bjorn, I respect you like an uncle....” and then turnaround ans stab me in the back. They’ve been doing this for thousands of years they’re good at.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.