Posted on 01/16/2010 1:48:51 PM PST by neverdem
Did you take the cannoli?
Who approved this crap?
Aren’t the editors at Free Republic aware Global Warming is a hoax?
See comment# 1. Do you always write comments before you read what the poster has possibly written? You got a hint with my subtitle, (These rats are suicidal!)
The New Republic is one of the house organs of the left. Should we remain oblivious when they think out loud?
The DimoCrats are a Cult of Death, all suffering from DCVE (Death Camp Victim Envy) If they can’t run the slave camps they want to be able to “prove” what good and innocent victims they are”, by becoming one of it’s mass graves statistics.
Hey Democraps...How much money are you going to throw at Global warming? Well then...Print it and throw it. Print it and throw it. Print it and throw it. Tear down another forest and then print it and throw it. We’ll be right here. What a bunch of a$$clowns....
What a contest, Rummeycare vs. Obumblecare!
Glad I don’t live in Messachuchits!
Follow it up with an Icewater Enema to celebrate global warming.......
Huh?
Doesn’t South Carolina have recall”
Why doesnt this RINO MAXIMUS just pull a Spector
OOPS! A Thousand Pardons!
Never mind. Friendly fire incident. Sorry.
The Dems are lucky gas isn't over three bucks a gallon as it soon may well be. Once it gets over that mark, John Q. Public will start complaining again about gas prices and evil oil companies. Obama will naturally make the wrong move and establish price controls which will lead to rationing. That should kill whatever slim chances he has of getting re-elected.
Huh? (I’m busy pulling my foot out of my mouth)
MCCain is for it so is Grahm, Collins,Snowe forget it
Sorry, but you can’t fix “stupid”. Murkowski has swallowed a bill of goods, and reality seems of no importance to her. Suicidal imbecility.
According to Richard Tol at http://umbrellog.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?p=95688 the following “Summary for Policy Makers is very selective, up to the point of twisting the chapters’ findings beyond recognition. In case of SAR WG3 Chapter 6, this was done against the will of the authors. The IPCC has learned from that. The selection process for authors is now more careful (awkward people like myself are not welcome) and there is self-selection too (David Pearce withdrew).” Richard Tol
CLIMATE POLICY—FROM RIO TO KYOTO
A Political Issue for 2000—and Beyond
http://media.hoover.org/documents/epp_102b.pdf
(In particular refer to page 19/20: ‘Politics Enters into Drafting the IPCC Report.’ Here examples are given of ‘substantial changes ... made between the time when the report was approved in Madrid and the time it was printed.The convening lead author, Ben Santer, readily admitted to making these changes.)
Check out the work of Miskolczi and Zagoni. They have, mostly the former researcher, described the thermodynamics of CO2 and the atmosphere.
Basically water vapor runs the show and accommodates CO2 as it rises and falls. Water vapor rises, carries heat upwards, condensation releases the heat at altitude to be lost to space, and the resulting clouds also prevent more energy from entering. This massive, global heat engine and negative feedback system acts so well that our climate is ridiculously stable as long as our orbit, axis of rotation, or the solar output do not change.
So, regardless of the fudging of the temperature data (which is illegal as it was intended to defraud, as it was intended to be used for major policy decisions), the simple fact is that CO2 cannot drive the climate. This is now well-described science which does not need a ridiculously expensive climate computer model to describe or understand.
Yeah, with Climategate it really is suicidal. No one is going to want their electricity bills skyrocket for no reason and Climategate proved their entire reasoning is fraudulent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.