Attorney wants to argue eligibility in Washington (Obama birth-certificate)

WND ^ | December 28, 2009 | Bob Unruh

[Uncle Chip]

One of Obama’s flock —

[verity]

I see! :-)

[deport]

This is an Obamabat thread. It has attracted the whole bevy of Obamabats.

---

Are they akin to the “Titzbats”

[jamese777]

What proof did the court have that said BHO was eligible other than third-party hearsay? His book “Dreams of My Father” is increansingly becoming a work of fiction.

Besides, Wong v. Ark was decided before the Nationality Act of 1952 (repealed 1986)

---

In Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana the plaintiffs stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii but based their argument of his ineligibility on the fact that his father was not a US citizen. Therefore no discovery concerning his birth certificate was necessary.
The original trial judge and the appellate court rejected that argument. The appellate court noted that President Chester A. Arthur’s father was born in Ireland, immigrated to Canada and then immigrated again to the US.