Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/23/2009 12:13:54 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: reaganaut1

The deal has enraged other Senators,...

The other senators aren’t the only enraged Americans. One of these days, one of these Washington bozos is gonna catch something really hard upside the head. If push comes to shove, better be the shover, and not the shovee.


48 posted on 12/23/2009 12:38:14 PM PST by flowerplough ( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Is it possible to get a Judicial Restraining Order on pending legislation?


49 posted on 12/23/2009 12:39:57 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Born in Nebraska, feel free to sue my home state over this.


52 posted on 12/23/2009 12:42:11 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So walk it back - he’s already voted.


54 posted on 12/23/2009 12:44:54 PM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; All

Nelson is on record as of yesterday that he would cancel his Medicare buyoff if the Nebraska governor asks him to. But it sounds like Nelson's vote FOR the overall Senate Bill would remain.

His vote needs to be pulled because of the abortion provisions that will likely be watered down or eliminated in Conference.


57 posted on 12/23/2009 12:49:34 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
The deal has enraged other Senators, especially those from red states, whose Republican Senators didn’t bring home any pork at all because they were not part of the negotiations with Democratic leaders.

Or maybe they have a small amount of decency, not being democrats.

58 posted on 12/23/2009 12:50:15 PM PST by Graybeard58 ("Get lost, Mitt. You're the Eddie Haskell of the Republican party." (Finny))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Madame du Farge’s knitting needles are about all worn out now...
59 posted on 12/23/2009 12:50:16 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Republican Senators didn’t bring home any pork at all because they were not part of the negotiations with Democratic leaders.

Yeah but, at least they got to watch it on C-SPAN, right? I mean, sure, I was stuck at work every day but, Mr. Obama said this would all happen out in the open, on C-SPAN. That's just the sort of change we voted for.
</sarcasm>

63 posted on 12/23/2009 12:52:46 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Nelson has said that he would vote for the bill only if...

We know his word means nothing!

69 posted on 12/23/2009 12:57:41 PM PST by lonestar (Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I really think it is time for a few states to tender plans to secede. If they were contiguous, all the better. Other than Florida York, I think the entire south would leave. Anyone upset by this could return north whence they came.


70 posted on 12/23/2009 12:57:51 PM PST by Lowcountry (RIP: Peterdanbrokaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Breaking news today from the Texas AG's Office:

“The Nebraska Compromise, which permanently exempts Nebraska from paying Medicaid costs that Texas and all other 49 states must pay, may violate the United States Constitution, as well as other provisions of federal law,” Abbott said. “In light of this unprecedented and highly questionable backroom deal, Texas will join South Carolina and other states in an effort to thoroughly review the constitutionality and legality of the Nebraska Compromise.”

Abbott added that his office would look at challenging the exemption, if it remains a part of the final bill. He also called the exemption a “backroom deal.”

“Because it disadvantages Texas taxpayers, the Texas Attorney General’s Office will explore all available avenues to challenge and overturn this legally problematic provision. Our democratic system of government depends upon transparency and openness,” he said. “This backroom deal goes too far and must be challenged because Texas deserves better.”

Source

72 posted on 12/23/2009 12:59:18 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

You know if this bill stands Nebraska will have a lot of “residents” all of the sudden.

I know military members can “live” there while not having a home there.


73 posted on 12/23/2009 1:02:05 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Bob Schrum says “brokering legislation” is the American way. Well let’s show him the American way of VOTING OUT CROOKS who don’t represent their constituents in the US SENATE!!


79 posted on 12/23/2009 1:06:28 PM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Florida is working on an answer within its own boundary too....

House HJR 37 / Senate SJR 72 -- The Health Care Freedom Act says any "law or rule shall not compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in any health care system," and specifies people and employers can’t be fined for not buying insurance. This bill does not ban federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid in our state, it simply focuses on restricting the federal government from forcing Americans to participate in an insurance policy, public or private.

see www.flfreedom.org
85 posted on 12/23/2009 1:16:26 PM PST by FL911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“Constitution? We don’ need no stinkin’ Constitution!”


86 posted on 12/23/2009 1:25:42 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So can the other 49 states export their Medicaid populations to Nebraska? If I was Arnold, I’d fund moving expenses for all the poor in Cali....


87 posted on 12/23/2009 1:27:40 PM PST by LizzyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Couldn’t this be considered essentially a “bill of attainder”, since it is penalizing the taxpayers of certain states because their senators did not vote in favor of the bill?


92 posted on 12/23/2009 1:43:05 PM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

10? Why not 49 states. Or, in Obama’s math, 56 states.


97 posted on 12/23/2009 2:11:53 PM PST by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

bump


98 posted on 12/23/2009 2:12:37 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

More than being unfair....Those involved should be on there way to prison.


103 posted on 12/23/2009 2:34:35 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson