Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Private Gun Sales – No Questions Asked No Sale – Protecting Gun Shows
ammoland.com ^ | 18 December, 2009 | Jeff Knox

Posted on 12/19/2009 5:18:58 AM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
I usually agree with Jeff, but I think he is wrong here. He is basicly saying that tracking gun sales and attempting to interdict sales by asking a few questions will help keep you safe. That is conceding the great fallacy of gun registration to the other side. It is not true and we should not push "mini-registration" for private sales. Gun salse should be just as anonomous as sales of bicycles or scuba gear, perhaps moreso, because they are constitutionally protected. That id information that you carry will not protect you if the individual uses the gun you sold for a bad purpose. In fact, it only provides a link to you so that you can now be sued. The next step will be for people who are useing these type of forms to demand access to the FBI instant check, so that they can prove that they checked out the person they sold to. This naturally leads to national gun registration, to "keep guns out of criminal hands". Of course, it does not such thing, but piles on legal burdens to gun owners and makes gun confiscations more likely.

We only need to look at how the 4473 forms have been used by the anti-freedom folks to see that this is a bad idea.

1 posted on 12/19/2009 5:18:59 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Agreed. Also stop calling gun show purchases between individuals a loophole.


2 posted on 12/19/2009 5:30:24 AM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Since the current policy around here is that weapons can check in, but never leave, I’ve no experience in actually selling.

That said, if I were to do so, I’d probably ask for the license, to verify an instate sale, and inspect it in detail.
If the picture matched the face in front of me, I’d hand it back, collect the cash, and pass the weapon.

But I’d not keep any paper record, with an exception for the C&R stuff, of course.


3 posted on 12/19/2009 5:34:53 AM PST by benewton (Life sucks, then you die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I think he is saying it will "keep you safe" from the gummint.

Μολὼν λάβε


4 posted on 12/19/2009 5:36:25 AM PST by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 03A3

Before I shot off ALL my ammo and sold ALL my guns last week,I purchased from private individuals as much as possible just so as to keep the Damned government out of MY business.


5 posted on 12/19/2009 5:36:56 AM PST by Joe Boucher (This marxist punk has got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Jeff Knox:
If the seller has any indication that the prospective buyer is a “prohibited person,” selling the gun is a crime.

Whoa.
And what if the seller's 'indication' is wrong? Can you spell 'lawsuit' Mr Knox?

Especially if said 'indication' is from a prospective buyer whose a member of a protected minority group.

6 posted on 12/19/2009 5:42:19 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Before I shot off ALL my ammo and sold ALL my guns last week

Why?

7 posted on 12/19/2009 5:45:05 AM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

You’re spot on. Why take a step in the direction to make it possible for an intrusive government to sidestep its way into registration?


8 posted on 12/19/2009 5:51:34 AM PST by FourPeas (Why does Professor Presbury's wolfhound, Roy, endeavour to bite him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

“Especially if said ‘indication’ is from a prospective buyer whose a member of a protected minority group.”

I don’t think private sales between individuals would be an issue, and refusing to sell to someone you reasonably believe “not qualified” would be prudent. I’d want witnesses.


9 posted on 12/19/2009 5:55:05 AM PST by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 03A3

Not really,
Been stockpiling both for ever.


10 posted on 12/19/2009 6:01:25 AM PST by Joe Boucher (This marxist punk has got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 03A3; Joe Boucher
Why?

'cause guns are icky?

11 posted on 12/19/2009 6:03:10 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If I were selling a legally bought handgun I would follow the letter of the law.
If that handgun is used in a crime some time in the future the Feds will be coming to see YOU.
“It was stolen” won’t likely cut it if you don’t have a police report.

If I were buying a handgun I would want the seller to have as little info as possible.
If he insisted on info then I would follow the letter of the law.

State laws vary, here in NC you need a Pistol Permit to buy a handgun, unless you hold a CCL.
You need one even if you buy from a private party and are required to receive one if you sell a handgun.


12 posted on 12/19/2009 6:16:18 AM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger
*** I don’t think private sales between individuals would be an issue, ***

Actually per Federal Law it is an issue. Sales to 'prohibited persons' by anyone is a Federal Crime.(the article mentions that too).

*** refusing to sell to someone you reasonably believe “not qualified” would be prudent. I’d want witnesses ***

It may seem prudent, but it also may violate that person's right if he/she in NOT a 'prohibited person' (You can't say 'I don't sell my guns to Blacks'). And witnesses may help you eventually win, but you could still be looking at HUGH lawyer costs.

Case in point:

There's a Gun Shop in the South Suburbs of Chicago (Chuck's Guns, Riverdale, IL). They do a brisk business and many of their sales are to Blacks from the South Side of Chicago. Every sale is legal, FBI checks done, and they buyers all have our STOO-PID mandatory IL FOID Card.

YET many of 'his guns' wind up being used by criminals as they're traced back to his store. Naturally it follows that Mayor Daley, Jesse Jackass, that ijit 'Father Pfleger' are all after him and try everything to shut him down. Even the Cook County Board is after his store, trying to pass illegal laws aimed at him, but would effect every gun shop in the county. (the ATF has also checked all his a paperwork and its all clean)

So Chuck's Guns is damned if they sell, and sued, broke and out of business if they don't -- all from following the law to the letter. (If it wasn't so far from me, I'd go there just to spite Daley and Jesse)

And even if I make a private sale, I have to see a valid IL FOID Card from the buyer. Even if its my next door neighbor who we've known for decades. And if there's no FOID Card, its no sale. That's the only way I can be 'prudent'.
13 posted on 12/19/2009 6:23:47 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“It is also illegal for anyone to purchase a firearm on behalf of someone else – even if that someone else could legally purchase it himself”

Does this mean you can’t purchase a firearm to give your wife/brother/father/etc. as a gift?


14 posted on 12/19/2009 6:30:43 AM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
It is legal to purchase a firearm as a gift, but it has to be a bona fide gift.
15 posted on 12/19/2009 6:33:00 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
It is also illegal for anyone to purchase a firearm on behalf of someone else – even if that someone else could legally purchase it himself – and a seller can again be held criminally responsible if they had any indication that such a “straw” transaction was taking place.

Not at all true. It's perfectly legal to purchase a gun as a gift, as Sarah Brady herself has done. The 4473 forms themselves actually state this.

16 posted on 12/19/2009 6:33:46 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
“It was stolen” won’t likely cut it if you don’t have a police report.

No, but you can tell them you sold it, and if there's no requirement to check purchasers in private sales, what can they say?

17 posted on 12/19/2009 6:38:53 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

“State laws vary, here in NC you need a Pistol Permit to buy a handgun, unless you hold a CCL.”

So in other words you need a license to exercise a Constitutional right.


18 posted on 12/19/2009 6:46:41 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie; marktwain

““It was stolen” won’t likely cut it if you don’t have a police report.”

Thats silly. There is no requirement to document private gun sales. At most you would need a bill of sale but even that wouldn’t be necessary.

What are they gonna do if you can’t prove you sold the gun? You’re saying you have to prove yourself innocent.


19 posted on 12/19/2009 6:48:50 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Respect for law enforcement seems to have led to a consensus that if you don’t cooperate with the police then you are guilty.

I would cooperate to the extent it would help them catch a real criminal. however they might just decide something you say makes it easier to pin the crime on you. Many (some) cops/prosecutors aren’t so finicky about putting the wrong person in jail. They just want a conviction.


20 posted on 12/19/2009 6:51:30 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson