Skip to comments.
Secret Space Shuttles
Air & Space Magazine ^
| 8/01/2009
| By Michael Cassutt
Posted on 12/12/2009 11:28:58 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
Every country has a strategic interest in aerospace. China’s space program is formally controlled by their army. Space is the next frontier for the next war. Too bad we are neglecting our programs in this regard.
2
posted on
12/12/2009 11:31:35 PM PST
by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: Eyes Unclouded
3
posted on
12/12/2009 11:32:30 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: sonofstrangelove
Commander Hoot Gibson
Hoot Gibson!? :-)
4
posted on
12/12/2009 11:41:55 PM PST
by
Bobalu
(I AM JIM THOMPSON)
To: Eyes Unclouded
Space is the ultimate high ground of the battlefield.
To: KevinDavis
6
posted on
12/12/2009 11:44:55 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: sonofstrangelove
I disagree. The only that gets built for space are satellites and land based missiles can take them all down
7
posted on
12/12/2009 11:47:32 PM PST
by
4rcane
To: 4rcane
Not if those satellites are armed with missiles and lasers.
8
posted on
12/12/2009 11:48:19 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: 4rcane

A proposed Russian Laser Satellite battery
9
posted on
12/12/2009 11:52:35 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: sonofstrangelove
as if a satellite can withstand unlimited number of missiles and unlimited number of different means from lasers to jamming
10
posted on
12/12/2009 11:53:11 PM PST
by
4rcane
To: 4rcane
If you have a constellation of satellites it will defeat incoming missiles
11
posted on
12/12/2009 11:54:37 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: sonofstrangelove
waste of money and pointless. Its like the French Maginot Line
12
posted on
12/12/2009 11:57:59 PM PST
by
4rcane
To: 4rcane
No it is not. Space satellite systems with lasers will render all missile attacks obsolete. That is the purpose of National Missile Defense.
13
posted on
12/12/2009 11:59:39 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: 4rcane
I disagree. The only that gets built for space are satellites and land based missiles can take them all down You're right - shooting down satellites is so easy and straighforward that Saddam Hussein did it in his historic wins over allied forces in 1991 and 2003.
14
posted on
12/13/2009 12:02:31 AM PST
by
Yossarian
(Free Aquabird!)
To: sonofstrangelove
This is the new “secret”. I'm still in my 30’s, God help us all...
15
posted on
12/13/2009 12:08:37 AM PST
by
allmost
To: Yossarian
Not if they are armed to defend themselves from such attack.
16
posted on
12/13/2009 12:11:57 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: sonofstrangelove
My dream satellite. It is both armed with a high powered laser and missiles.
17
posted on
12/13/2009 12:12:51 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: Eyes Unclouded
Space is the next frontier for the next war. Too bad we are neglecting our programs in this regard. WELL SAID. It is hard to believe how many intelligent people fail to grasp the truth of what you wrote.
The nation that dominates in space this century will dominate the world. American military should put a premium, as in top priority, on attaining and maintaining superiority in space technology.
18
posted on
12/13/2009 12:14:15 AM PST
by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
To: sonofstrangelove
SOS... Wouldn’t firing a missile from a satellite result in the satellite moving in the opposite direction and losing its normal orbit? ....I’ll vote for the lasers.
19
posted on
12/13/2009 12:37:25 AM PST
by
octex
To: octex
Only if you didn’t open the back door, too.
20
posted on
12/13/2009 12:47:04 AM PST
by
Sparticus
(Libs, they're so open minded that their brains leaked out.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson