Posted on 12/04/2009 8:07:39 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
“Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”
—Jim Robinson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2203455/posts?page=78#78
You guys are gonna love this one...LOL!
Bless their collective hearts. One does have to ‘feel’ their pain in that vast emptiness of missing links.
Just a sign of weak faith in my book.
You mean NO faith at all
I can see why someone like you would want to lash out after a post such as this...LOL!
I am glad you could post this here, I might have missed it.
When this “find” was announced the link they tried to make to man made no sense to me. I said to someone they will find out that this is an existing species.
Its “Snap Your Finger” time again.
You can thank Jim Robinson for allowing these posts in News/Activism. They were all being banished to Gen/Chat, until Jim stood up and personally intervened on behalf of the large body of FReepers who belong to the Christian Right. See #1 for more :o)
So why the globalwarming key words? It does not belong there.
So a single incorrect claim in paleontology that takes three months to correct is somehow equivalent to the AGW fraud?
Keyword - evos-despair
Because of what I put in the parenthesis in the title, and because I think they are linked/motivated by nature-religion, ideology, and fraud.
What you meant to say was: "..on behalf of the dozen or so FReepers who nominally claim to belong to the Christian Right and who rabidly fantasize that this crap is actually representative of the belief of any Christians at all."
Yes, the Cult of Gaia (AGW) and the Cult of Darwin (Evolutionists) are related. Both Refuse the existence of God.
What? Scientist objectively evaluating a scientific claim in order to get the correct conclusion from the observable data available? Scientist challenging and correcting other scientific claims based on evidence? The free market place of ideas producing the best & accurate conclusions . . . What a concept! That’s what happens when the only dogma is the process not the conclusion.
Too bad we can’t apply the same standards to the biblical flood or the exodus or the earth standing still or the existence of biblical characters . . .
No Christian calls the Bible a work of untruths
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.