Skip to comments.
Who's Watching Glenn Beck? [Says FoxNews Must Not Allow Platform For "Extremists"!]
LATimes ^
| November 24th 2009
Posted on 11/24/2009 7:10:55 PM PST by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
1
posted on
11/24/2009 7:10:56 PM PST
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
Who's Watching Glenn Beck? Who's Reading the LA Times?
2
posted on
11/24/2009 7:12:33 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Socialism is an opportunistic infection of the body politic. It occurs when defenses are low.)
To: Steelfish
....anyone else think it’s ironic that a press outlet built on free speech and free press is now lecturing us on the evils of those ideas and suggesting that maybe free speech/press is a bad idea?
3
posted on
11/24/2009 7:13:15 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Steelfish
Mass Media getting Glen Beck Derangement Syndrome. No reference to MSNBC’s mental retard: Keith Olbermann. Where the Jewish anti-Defamation League?
4
posted on
11/24/2009 7:13:45 PM PST
by
Steelfish
To: FormerACLUmember
I thought the whole White Hut was watching all of FOX.
5
posted on
11/24/2009 7:13:48 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: FormerACLUmember
6
posted on
11/24/2009 7:13:59 PM PST
by
FrdmLvr
("The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." Orwell)
To: Steelfish
I must have missed Beck’s anti-Semitic rants. Guess I’ve been listening to leftists and theirs.
7
posted on
11/24/2009 7:13:59 PM PST
by
boop
(Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
To: Steelfish
Glenn is getting to the Socialist Elites
8
posted on
11/24/2009 7:14:27 PM PST
by
steveab
(When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
To: Steelfish
Since when is telling the truth Extremism?
9
posted on
11/24/2009 7:15:14 PM PST
by
doc1019
(Obama, not so much.)
To: doc1019
Since democrat foisted political correctness took over Amerika, that’s when.
10
posted on
11/24/2009 7:16:24 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: FrdmLvr
Who’s Watching Glenn Beck? ...Who’s Reading the LA Times?
“Rules for Radicals”: In your face back at the Marxist sub-humans at all times.
11
posted on
11/24/2009 7:17:06 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Socialism is an opportunistic infection of the body politic. It occurs when defenses are low.)
To: Steelfish
From the ratings, about 3 million or more. Could there be a better endorsement for Beck than to be demonized by the LA Times?
To: FormerACLUmember
Who's Reading the LA Times?
To: Steelfish
What gives all of this nonsense an ominous twist is Beck's announcement that he intends to use his TV and radio shows to promote a mass movement that will involve voter registration drives, training in community organizing,,,
You mean, like ACORN?
To: Steelfish
Glenn Beck remembers watching terrorist attacks in the 70’s and 80’s as a young man. We knew it was coming. It did and Clinton did squat. It hit hard in 2001 and Bush said enough. The liberals are very stupid to not know that course of learning.
To: Steelfish
16
posted on
11/24/2009 7:21:51 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(When do they collect and jail the homeless when they don't buy their health care?)
To: Steelfish
Why don’t the LA Times spend a little effort covering extremists on the Left. It wouldn’t be hard: some of them are in the White House.
17
posted on
11/24/2009 7:22:57 PM PST
by
popdonnelly
(Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
To: Steelfish
I don’t watch television news (actually the only TV I watch any more are online episodes of NCIS, but I digress), so I don’t watch Beck.
I do, however, have a colleague who does (interestingly a fellow who’s now on our side, but had been part of the Chicago hard left in the late ‘60’s and early ‘70’s), and he observes that the White House has devoted a webpage to answering the ‘lies’ and ‘distortions’ from Beck (or maybe it’s Fox News generally), and that the ‘answers’ consist of picking on minor errors of factual detail: there is no answer to the main theses or major factual claims Beck makes. In effect, the Obama administration by claiming to answer his ‘lies’ and only picking on minor details, admits that the main substance of his factual claims are true.
18
posted on
11/24/2009 7:23:40 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: popdonnelly
19
posted on
11/24/2009 7:23:53 PM PST
by
popdonnelly
(Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
To: Bobkk47
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson