Posted on 11/02/2009 2:41:49 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
How do you know he doesn’t have any money? Just curious...
He must have enough for the attorneys; he has certainly been in court enough (sueing and being sued). Legal history at link: http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A625022
FR needs a VU ping list! ;)
-- "... these events present a potential for conflicts of interest between counsel and client ...": Some of our other clients are really miffed that we've taken this case. They'll be around long after Fairey's gone... and their pockets are waaaay deeper than his.
-- withdrawal and substitution "... can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client ...": This case is so bogus that a naked blind deaf-and-dumb affirmative-action One-L could argue it... and win.
-- "... additional grounds that for reasons of professional obligation present counsel could explain in camera...": Our client is a lying, duplicitous scumbag and we don't mind telling you privately that we'd just as soon be shed of him.
And last, but by no means least:
-- "...Fisher ... and Palfrey ...": Snotfrad cocks a gleeful snook at Haaahvd. Take this and choke on it, you arrogant bustards!
Actually, I think it’s simpler than that. The lawyers who want to drop the case have realized that Fairey is a perjurer and don’t want to get disbarred as accessories.
That works, too. :)
I would absolutely join that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.