Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Usurper Detection Legislation Should Be Passed Within Each State
10-30-2009 | Uncle Sham

Posted on 10/30/2009 3:00:46 PM PDT by Uncle Sham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: Alamo-Girl

Alamo Girl, What is your opinion of this concept and do you think it is obtainable in some form or fashion?


121 posted on 11/11/2009 4:11:05 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
"On the contrary, what the "Birthers" are doing - by going to court and seeking redress of a likely insult to the Constitution - is well within the confines of the First Amendment's rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances. "

Thank You for nailing it.

If anything is "sedition" or "treason", it's got to be "usurping" the Presidency and or aiding and abetting a "usurper" to the Presidency during a time of war.

122 posted on 11/11/2009 4:16:54 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
"If the present person in the Oval office is legal, he shouldn’t have any problems with such legislation, nor should his supporters."

If the present person in the Oval office was legal, he would not have gone to great expense to block the disclosure of his real birth certificate and then sealed his other records, as well.

Big "if".

123 posted on 11/11/2009 5:34:41 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
Seems to me it's a good idea for each state to require by law proof of eligibility before a name is "printed" on a ballot.

Generally though laws are not retroactive so I doubt it would be of any help to past elections. But it would help in 2012 etc.

124 posted on 11/11/2009 8:54:40 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
"Generally though laws are not retroactive so I doubt it would be of any help to past elections. But it would help in 2012 etc."

The law I propose would go into effect the day it was passed and would not be "retroactive". It would affect all legislative and presidential executive orders occurring from the moment it became law.

Of course, if it exposed a "usurper" while in office, I'm sure that anything he signed before such a law went into effect would be challenged in other ways.

125 posted on 11/12/2009 5:43:42 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Ah, that makes sense.


126 posted on 11/12/2009 9:00:54 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Thanksgiving bump.


127 posted on 11/26/2009 7:13:38 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Would it have more force if it was in a States’ Constitution?


128 posted on 11/26/2009 8:25:25 AM PST by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HP8753

I really don’t think it would matter legally. Putting such a provision in a state’s constitution would take more of an effort than just passing a state law. A law could be passed in a week.


129 posted on 11/26/2009 3:11:53 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Then charge the Birthers with Sedition.

Birther goes to court with his defense that Obama was born in Kenya and is an usurper who has gained his office by (A) False Statements under oath [We have Obama’s signed statement from Arizona during the campaign stating that he was a natural born citizen] BIG TIME SMOKING GUN (B) Obstruction of Justice (c) Criminal Conspiracy.

So bring it on. Bring the sedition charges. You are just trying to SCARE people.

I don’t scare easily.

You know, Bob Bauer, YOU will eventually wind up behind bars for this fiasco, don’t you?

And so will Judge Carter.


130 posted on 11/29/2009 9:33:18 PM PST by bigoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

The True Answer to the health care fiasco Bump


131 posted on 12/21/2009 5:45:50 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Obama has never presented such proof to anybody, anywhere, anytime, anyhow.

The way he got on the ballot in fifty states is: the vast majority of the populace is as intellectually dishonest and lazy, and as willing to swallow publicity stunts (like releasing forged jpg images of forged documents) as “evidence,” as you are.


132 posted on 12/23/2009 9:23:54 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“The way he got on the ballot in fifty states is: the vast majority of the populace is as intellectually dishonest and lazy, and as willing to swallow publicity stunts (like releasing forged jpg images of forged documents) as “evidence,” as you are.”

So the majority need the Birthers to set the rest of us straight, right? Why, if you folks, a truly tiny minority, could just take over and rule the rest of us, things would be just fine, correct? A tiny minority ruling the rest of us because the tiny minority is so smart and we’re so dumb!

Here’s a tip; the majority might get upset with the tiny ruling minority made up of such smart Birther types.


133 posted on 12/24/2009 3:50:28 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Try responding to what I said, instead of something you wish I had said.


134 posted on 12/24/2009 4:54:36 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

You asserted, falsely, that Obama had presented proof of his citizenship status to all fifty states. You did not respond to my factual statement that: Obama has never presented such proof to anybody, anywhere, anytime, anyhow.


135 posted on 12/24/2009 4:56:55 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
those books will be written in Chinese

or Arabic.

136 posted on 12/24/2009 7:53:27 AM PST by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

You are wasting your time by trying to debate “Mr.Threat-Machine”. Pay him/her/it no mind. BTW, Happy New Year!


137 posted on 01/02/2010 11:16:49 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

I still think this is a better approach than waiting for the next election cycle to catch a Usurper.


138 posted on 02/12/2011 7:04:14 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: MS from the OC

It all comes down to what is proof.


139 posted on 03/30/2011 9:35:37 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MS from the OC

It all comes down to what is proof.


140 posted on 03/30/2011 9:35:55 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson