Posted on 10/28/2009 10:48:59 AM PDT by susanconstant
Tax protestors have brought the incorrect argument. So have people arguing titles of nobility against lawyers. Their entire approach is completely incorrect. Plus Obama makes another argument now possible. Again, see my attachments like:
A LIST OF THE PUBLICATION DATES OF THE SO CALLED MISSING 13th AMENDMENT
&
A JURY NULLIFIED THE FEDERAL RESERVE IN 1968. IT IS KNOWN AS THE MINNESOTA CREDIT RIVER RULING.
A surprisingly small number of the total cases filed ever make it to conferencing. My case is unique in all of American history as nobody else successfully sued the Chief Justice thus SCOTUS itself. how do you know as fact w/o question I successfully sued Roberts and SCOTUS?
I’m not a lawyer but I made it to that list when my case is a pro se authority case and the only other one like it is Marbury V Madison. We’ve only had two pro se authority cases. To get on that list I then had to be successful; I had to successfully make my point of law against the US for defaulting and then agaisnt Roberts and SCOTUS or else no Justice would ever post it on that list as that then constitues serving you notice.
One of my claims? SCOTUS like me was held to impossible standards in BVG and now with Obama V Anybody. The citizens injured Roberts and SCOTUS via failing to act so I then in turn was injured by Roberts and SCOTUS plus the citizens because of the same, failing to act.
Look up the word “illiterate” as you are using it incorrectly.
So you get it...may I ask you what your profession is as mostly only physicists and logicians seem to get the huge-o point of law.
All I did was appeal both governing documents, which are signed, federal contracts, to SCOTUS to then ‘force’ the US, the sitting officers, to uphold them upon direct appeal or null and void them upon direct appeal. ONLY THE PEOPLE NOT THE OFFICERS MAY NULL THEM UPON APPEAL AS ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE AND WE ARE A LIVING GOVERNMENT. The sittimg officers aka the US nullified them, or attmepted to nullify them, but SCOTUS did not thus it is now thrown to The People via hearing in person in SCOTUS.
“What do you mean the Judciary cannot adjudicate our Constitution??? All judges do is adjudicate the law; it’s why we have SCOTUS! Where does it say except Article II Section 1 Clause 5??? Are you, federal judges, nullifying it WITHOUT HEARING THE ACTUAL CASE ON PAPER OR IN PERSON??? A de facto Executive Order??? A de facto amending of our law??? A de facto vote in which only federal judges have a vote???” Yup.
So, what do you do as I am trying to address the citizens having been incapacitated by the government...I can name every element of the injury or so I believe thus I am taking an informal poll to be certain.
WRONG: To be conferenced at least one Justice must set it for confernce; not all filed cases go to conference. Not even close to it! Then at least four Justices must then want to hear your case in person for it to be set for argument.
In my case? I changed that all up by naming Roberts. Only SCOTUS can hear it and SCOTUS must hear it to overcome the conflict, the violation of separation of power and as no court would then exist to adjudicate The Constitution. Justice for all of you would be nonexistent and the entrenched oligarchy would rule instead of The People as all power would be skewed in their favor, in favor of the wealthy and their family and friends. Their only choice is to hear it as the US is already spiritually dead (no liberty) and so physical death of the nation will then ensue exactly like Rome.
Actually I wrote to Stockholm and told the Committee to call me when they are willing to cough up three:
Peace for making the case for equal rights for women and children thus all humans;
Medicine for discovering how and when life begins in the womb or when personhood is thus the right exists;
And Physics for resolving Uniformity.
Then I said: Wait, let me look at your other awards as I thought you could not sink any lower than “the climatologists for Peace” but I was wrong so because of Obama I might need to win four for the actual hard work I my own self produced to then rescue you from this politcal cesspool.
See my space-time continuum post. I LOVE this typo!
I WROTE THIS SO THIRD GRADERS COULD UNDERSTAND IT AND THEY DO. YOU NEED TO READ THE ACTUAL PETITON, BRIEF & MOTION FOR THE 19th TIME AS YOU AREN’T A THIRD GARDER. AS COGNIZANT AS A THIRD GARDER I MEAN.
P.S. Please do not call me a “patriot” as if a person does not understand the concept known as sovereignty then they do not know what that word actually means.
No, as the US did not get here in 100 words or less. You’ve been producing BILLIONS maybe TRILLIONS of unconstitutional documents over the last 200 plus years so I do not expect you to understand a constitutional document. Hey, if you understood a constitutional document known as The Constitution no injury to me, no Bush V Gore, no Roberts and no Obama.
You need to reason the Constitution to understand the point of law. Otherwise no amount of words large or samll will help.
The People, the military and SCOTUS constitute vertical checks and balances aka moral authority aka will. The People is the constitutionally set government of the US not the offices and not the paper as the offices and the paper are dead institutions only. I’m invoking vertical checks by demanding SCOTUS recognize We The People as the constitutioanlly set government, to recognize the will of The People as that is to be the will of the Constitution.
You are a body of belief; you are supposed to be the living embodiment of the Constitution. No currently sitting officer embodies the will of the law; no currently sitting officer embodies the will of The People. In fact they no longer embody even one single letter of the law let alone a word or clause because of Obama & Co - all of election 08.
You can read it on SCRIBD as I write a petition straight through in one sitting. I’m one person acting alone not a firm. I’m human not a lawyer. I only edit it if it is returned for a technicality. Then I *might* correct some typos. The law is: Come as you are as we’re all equal and you need no qualifications other than age 35 and natural birth (Native American & human). Didn’t you hear Jesus or the American Founders when they said this?
SCOTUS once considered a federal question a person entered on a cocktail napkin.
You win this type of case on paper first then in person as Marbury won but lost, recall? He never acted upon leaving SCOTUS as Marshall told him to do to then claim his award -that actual paper commission - but I did thus as Roberts stood aside already upon my direct order then I re-enter IN PERSON having already won ON PAPER. See my other posts.
The word DENIAL is a deceptive appearance only. It’s not actual or legal; it exists in reality as it had to as I needed SCOTUS to manufacture the piece of paper that then proves my claim as it is a piece of paper that rises to proof: The SCOTUS docket saying DENIED is my proof as to DENY me SCOTUS had to violate Marbury thus reasoning itself out of existence thus I am correct:
NO JUSTICE EXISTS, NOT EVEN THE JUSTICES THEMSELVES EXIST AS YOU JUST REASONED YOURSELF OUT OF A JOB AND OUT OF A COURT BY VIOLATING MARBURY! I AM DENIED ANY AND ALL JUSTICE! I HAVE NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW!
SCOTUS concurred by writing DENIED. If they wrote GRANTED I’d have no case! They DENIED me thus concurring and telling me: keep acting upon leaving and so come back. They even exactly said in a letter ‘go to the one court you have not gone to yet: Federal Appeals.’ I entered directly like Marbury so I skipped Federal Appeals. So I took their advice even though it was pointless thus here I am.
No but it the best writing since invention of Orange Julius.
Put the crack pipe down NOW
“This is the most powerful writing since Julius Caesar.”
Veni ,vidi, vici.”
“Semper ubi, sub ubi.”
Put the crack pipe down NOW
No kidding. Maybe Thorazine is a good idea.
Putting aside legal arguments for a minute, have you found your communication techniques successful in the past? If so could you provide some links. Thanks.
Yep.
See ya in the Whitehouse!
Oh, have they started the tours again? Because that's the only way you'll see the inside of the place.
No kidding.
Might I suggest you try writing them one coherent thought at a time?
So it’s ebonics or something? Your aren’t going impress Justice Thomas with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.