Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: nickcarraway
BTW< this also pokes fun at the MSM because they all have to admit that they never saw Obama’s thesis, and that they don’t care that they never saw it.
To: nickcarraway
Apart from the fact that Rush withdrew the story, how does this idiot reporter know that the thesis is NOT anti-American? Since Obama has managed to send it down the memory hole.
I say it was almost certainly an attack on his country, like the article in the Columbia newspaper on the same subject that he wrote about that time. Can this jerk prove otherwise?
62 posted on
10/26/2009 2:29:19 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: nickcarraway
And of course, we all know what Obama’s real thesis says.
We do, don’t we?
What? We don’t?
66 posted on
10/26/2009 4:39:39 PM PDT by
Doohickey
(I try to take my days one at a time, but occasionally several days attack me at once.)
To: nickcarraway
In fact, he says, why the President never said what the hoax claimed, "we know he thinks it."
Separated At Birth -- as proven by FAKE BUT ACCURATE natal records....
67 posted on
10/27/2009 3:51:05 PM PDT by
steve-b
(Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson