Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/26/2009 12:37:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: nickcarraway

And what’s there to apologize for? As this inane article points out, he DID correct the record — the same day that the error occurred!


33 posted on 10/26/2009 12:56:03 PM PDT by DJ Frisat (How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

He didn’t fall for this. He said it was not checked.


35 posted on 10/26/2009 1:03:50 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Y’all need to Freep the poll. 71% are saying Rush LIED, which honest people know he did not lie.


37 posted on 10/26/2009 1:04:59 PM PDT by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

odumbo refused to release his records and also fails to apologize


38 posted on 10/26/2009 1:05:10 PM PDT by italianquaker (“Every inch of this Administration is rife with corruption and cronyism.” --- Michelle Malkin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

RUSH: In the first hour of this program, I cited a statement that Michael Ledeen found on the blog Jumping in Pools reporting on Obama’s college thesis written when he was at Columbia. The paper was called “Aristocracy Reborn,” and in the first ten pages Obama wrote the following: “[T]he Constitution allows for many things but what it does not allow is the most revealing. The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believe the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy.” Now, I got a note from a researcher who has been scouring the Internet, and the note says this:

“Rush Limbaugh: Mini-warning on these quotes.” Because the paper that Obama wrote, “Aristocracy Reborn,” the first ten pages were all that reporter Joe Klein was permitted to see; and it says here that Klein did write about it for TIME Magazine. A researcher has been scouring the Internet and can’t find any sources for the quote. “The blog that Ledeen cites doesn’t have supporting info,” supposedly. The source post that was from August, says it’s going to be in an upcoming report from Joe Klein, but the researcher can’t find anything that has come out since, and nothing in Klein’s blog. There have been no matches found on the Internet for any of the info or quotes other than the source posting. So I now say that the blog from which this came has no sourcing data other than Joe Klein upcoming report and Joe Klein hasn’t written his upcoming report.

So we have to hold out the possibility that this is not accurate. However, I have had this happen to me recently. I have had quotes attributed to me that were made up, and when it was pointed out to the media that the quotes were made up, they said, “It doesn’t matter! We know Limbaugh thinks it anyway.” Sort of like Dan Rather said, “I don’t care if these documents are forged. I know that Bush did what he did at the National Guard. I don’t care if the documents are forged.” I don’t care if the Limbaugh quotes are made up. So, I can say, “I don’t care if these quotes are made up. I know Obama thinks it. You know why I know Obama thinks it? Because I’ve heard him say it.” Not about the Constitution, but about the Supreme Court. Again, 2001, FM radio station interview in Chicago when he was a state senator in Illinois.

OBAMA 2001: If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples so that, uh, I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and — and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay. But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.

RUSH: Now, he’s talking about the Warren Court “never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth.” So we’ve got a supposed piece from his college thesis at Columbia where he complains that the Constitution didn’t talk about the distribution of wealth. So we know that it’s on his mind. So even if he didn’t say it, I know he thinks it. That’s how it works now in the media. And I do know he thinks it because I just heard what I heard, and so did you. Let’s see.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I’m also told that the blog containing the passage on Obama’s thesis is a satire blog. So it’s one of these sites like ScrappleFace or The Onion or some such thing. So I shout from the mountaintops: “It was satire!” But we know he thinks it. Good comedy, to be comedy, must contain an element of truth, and we know how he feels about distribution of wealth. He’s mad at the courts for not going far enough on it. So we stand by the fabricated quote because we know Obama thinks it anyway. That’s how it works in the media today.

END TRANSCRIPT


39 posted on 10/26/2009 1:05:50 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

c’mon, he did it deliberately to tweak the media...it’s brilliant!


40 posted on 10/26/2009 1:07:03 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The idiotic Left is falling yet again for Rush’s giant setup. Rush knew all along the story was false, yet he went along pretending it was true. Only to “discover” later that it wasn’t but still maintaining his original point because we know Obama thinks those thoughts in his head anyway. Actual facts do not matter. What matters is what we KNOW to be true.

Illustrating absurdity by being absurd. Fantastically done, Rush ! :)


44 posted on 10/26/2009 1:15:02 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t exactly see what the problem is... He REPORTED it as un-verified...and when it was found out to be a hoax he reported that immediately...

it SOUNDS so much like Obama it could be true...

Screw your ‘apology’

I have a feeling if he DOES offer an ‘apology’ it will be scathing and worse than any perceived injury they already see...


45 posted on 10/26/2009 1:17:19 PM PDT by Mr. K (My biggest fear is that one of my typos becomes a freeper catchphrase...I'm series!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Ironic ... In his own words Obama admitted his father was a British citizen. Therefore Obama lacks the pure allegiance and jurisdiction required at birth to be a natural born citizen. Yet, Limbaugh only touched that topic casually with a bit of tongue in cheek. The university thesis, on the other hand, warranted broader commentary with less supporting evidence? Huh? I love Rush ... I just don't always understand his logic. He'd have been less ridiculed going out on a limb for the natural born citizenship issue than for this one.


46 posted on 10/26/2009 1:22:43 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Michael Saul, New York Daily News is so gay/metrosexual

47 posted on 10/26/2009 1:25:58 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Rush played a clip of Obama saying those things about the constitution and redsitributing wealth.

He also said there was not a source for the “news” article so he couldn’t say it was real but we all know that Obama wants to do those things


48 posted on 10/26/2009 1:27:52 PM PDT by Rightly Biased (If Clinton was the first black president then Obama is the first black Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The story was fake but accurate.


49 posted on 10/26/2009 1:28:49 PM PDT by FReepaholic (Jump You F**kers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Limbaugh, who seizes on every opportunity to blast Obama, ended up with egg on his face when he read an Internet satire piece that claimed President Obama dissed the Constitution in his college thesis at Columbia University.

As has already been posted, Rush had first said he wasn't sure about it and then, on the same show announced that it wasn't true.

However, the best way to prove it's false is to produce Obama's real thesis at Columbia University.

Still waiting...

50 posted on 10/26/2009 1:29:07 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It’s the old Dan Rather “we know it’s true even though there is no proof” bit. Sucks to be on the other side of that, doesn’t it Barry?


51 posted on 10/26/2009 1:31:03 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Michael Saul falls for Rush Limbaugh quotes that Rush never made!

I suggest that Michael Saul and the rest of the OLD MEDIA compare their accuracy rate to Rush Limbaugh's! They should sweep around their own door before trying to clean up around someone elses!

52 posted on 10/26/2009 1:31:10 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Photobucket

"Keep it up, Drive-By's ...."

53 posted on 10/26/2009 1:31:58 PM PDT by Jackknife (Chuck Norris grinds his coffee with his teeth, and boils his water with his rage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
...he doesn't apologize for the error...

Perhaps the leftist-extremist should appologize to Sarah Palin first and maybe even GWB first.

54 posted on 10/26/2009 1:36:19 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The reporter just copied and pasted from Media Matters again, what crap.


55 posted on 10/26/2009 1:56:02 PM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Ledeen, BTW, is no “blogger” but a respected foreign policy analyst.


56 posted on 10/26/2009 1:57:37 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Rush was playing the media. The mainstream media, paragons of fact-checking, ran with false quotes which they used to libel and smear Rush; most of them never apologized, and instead said things like that the quotes are what Rush was thinking.

Rush took this satire opportunity to demonstrate their hypocrisy. Every word he said about this piece is right out of the words the mainstream media used talking about Rush and racism. But they don’t recognize that, because they are too stupid.


57 posted on 10/26/2009 1:58:46 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson