School Children Banned From Kensington Public Parks

ABC 7 News ^ | October 23, 2009

[subterfuge]

The town council unanimously passed a resolution

Typical ABC piece, lacking any names that can be dealt with. People should stand up to tyranny.

[subterfuge]

Little kids shouldn’t leave school grounds during the day.

Totally seperate issue than a local council enacting a "resolution" to BAN kids from a park.

[subterfuge]

And another thing. Ever notice the cabal of liberals that go off the deep end when a “council” tries to ban feeding the homeless in public places? That is sacrosanct.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Brookewood's headmaster tells ABC 7 News it's a public park for all to use but Kensington's mayor disagrees. He said the park is for taxpaying citizens -- not abuse by a private non-profit school.

Gee, bird-brains, don't at least some of the parents of these kids pay taxes to your god-forsaken, liberal hellhole? And it wouldn't surprise me if parents elsewhere in Montgomery County had some of their tax money distributed to Kensington, so their kids should be able to play there, too! So there, nyah-nyah-nyah!

First, they ban Santa in 2001. Now, they ban children from playgrounds. What's next?

Maryland "Freak State" PING!

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

First, they ban Santa. Now, they ban older kids. When, oh when will they ban home-schoolers???

[the OlLine Rebel]

“Gee, bird-brains, don’t at least some of the parents of these kids pay taxes to your god-forsaken, liberal hellhole?”

Indeed. As if “private” means they don’t pay taxes. These people pay up TWICE, jackass. Once for your lousy schools, and 2nd for their eeeevil private school.

OTOH, I don’t see why they can’t ban them, per se. But I still don’t know why they can’t simply state “no loitering” and kick them out as they abuse the time there. Why they need more laws I don’t know.

Oh wait - they’re liberals, I’m sure. That’s why they need more laws.