Spin from the BBC about Darwin (devoted to absolving Darwinism from revolutionary evolutionism)

CMI ^ | October 22, 2009 | Russell Grigg

[mnehring]

“Why are there no feral chickens?”

Because in Texas we call them Guinea Hens.

[count-your-change]

My response has been a bit more brief ,but The Hand works too.

[Buck W.]

Forrest, you continue to make me chuckle!

[GourmetDan]

"At the time Abraham was commanded to sacrifice his son and Joshua was commanded to commit war crimes it was not yet scripture. They proved that they were no better than those who sacrificed children to Baal."

At the time 2 Tim 3:16-17 was written, Genesis and Joshua were considered Scripture. For you to claim that commands given before they were considered Scripture are not actually Scripture invalidates the entire Bible, including the words of Christ.

"Maybe you and I have different Gods. My God would not command you or me to commit an unconscionable act in His name."

Interesting that you assume that your definition of 'unconscionable act' is the same as God's. I believe that was the problem Job's friends had. Or perhaps you are merely your own god?

Just how much Scripture do you have left after you get finished throwing out the parts you don't like? And if you are so certain as to retain that right for yourself, why do you not give the same right to others who choose to include the parts you don't like? Surely you have some Scriptural basis for that behavior. Are you really just your own god?

[Gumlegs]

I don't debate or answer questions posed by evo-atheists who pretend to be Christian while denouncing genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. You are a wolf in sheep's clothing. There is no debating you, there is only exposing you as per Matthew 7:15-20. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.

What a contemptible coward you are.

[whattajoke]

Ted Holden? I thought that was like a big internet/usnet joke from the late 90s like John Titor. He was a parody like claiming that Saturn was once in earth’s orbit (or the other way around) and a bunch of weird stuff to try to fill in the Young Earth evidence gaps? He was/is real?

LOL, that's fantastic. I think Ted's work is done. From an anonymous nut, to an Internet nut with a "voice," to a Free Republic bannee several times over nut, to a FR retread nut, and now the coup de grace - a mythical legend in his own time nut!

If you doubt the "realness" of Wendy1946, you merely have check out his recent posts. When one is a true nut, one can't help outing himself.

[GodGunsGuts]

He said while peering into the mirror. It must suck being you.

[count-your-change]

To Chuckles, the self made man: Go speak to The Hand.
I have no time for your nonsense.

[Gumlegs]

No, it was addressed to you.

Feel free to fling a few Bible verses around and avoid answering again, but you really should try coming up with a new act. This one's getting stale.

[whattajoke]

Eh, GGG’s had a rough day. Admonished by the mods, the usual cronies too busy today to back him up much... Remember, he specifically asked to have his religious posts remain in “news” and he has said many times he feels that his spamming is the Lord’s spamming.

[Buck W.]

“Whacky like...Man living in the land of 100+ large meat eating dinosaurs?”

Prior to the Fall, why would God have put T-Rex and other ripping/tearing dinosaurs at such a disadvantage in the vegetarian world? Did cows have to chew their lettuce for them?

On the other hand, why would he have given them such a post-Fall advantage?

[liberalism is suicide]

In answer to both questions, nope. I was just giving an illustration,food for thought: If Darwin can’t be blamed for Hitler,then can Marx be blamed for Stalin?

[Buck W.]

Nice talkin’ to ya! Have a great day, Forrest!

[xcamel]

Them be ‘”Goofy Chickens” and I has a dozen.

[mnehring]

They are about the funniest animals I’ve seen, and dumb as dirt.

[Ira_Louvin]

Argumentum ad Hominem :

The fallacy of attacking the character or circumstances of an individual who is advancing a statement or an argument instead of trying to disprove the truth of the statement or the soundness of the argument. Often the argument is characterized simply as a personal attack.

1. The personal attack is also often termed an "ad personem argument": the statement or argument at issue is dropped from consideration or is ignored, and the locutor's character or circumstances are used to influence opinion.

2. The fallacy draws its appeal from the technique of "getting personal." The assumption is that what the locutor is saying is entirely or partially dictated by his character or special circumstances and so should be disregarded.

[xcamel]

True, but they are death on two legs to all the bad bugs that dare to enter my barn and pastures.
(and they are a cheap [pun intended] alarm system for the barn too!)

[xcamel]

Correction:

Slanderum ad Nauseum

[scripter]

Sometimes I’m a developer/programmer as it depends on the contract details.

[Ira_Louvin]