Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spin from the BBC about Darwin (devoted to absolving Darwinism from revolutionary evolutionism)
CMI ^ | October 22, 2009 | Russell Grigg

Posted on 10/22/2009 8:31:09 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-449 next last
To: dmz

Surely you know my position by now!


141 posted on 10/22/2009 11:51:03 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970
Hitler's own words (from post 115):

From where do we get the right to believe that man was not from the very beginning what he is today. A glance in Nature shows us , that changes and developments happen in the realm of plants and animals. But nowhere do we see inside a kind, a development of the size of the leap that Man must have made, if he supposedly has advanced from an ape-like condition to what he is’ (now)

His own words.

Not the interpretation of someone with their own agenda. His own words.

You are entitled to your own opinion. But not your own facts.

142 posted on 10/22/2009 11:52:00 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970
Notice also they way you evolutionists keep shifting around to avoid our points. I speak of "Nazis" and you ignore 99.99% of them, instead citing Hitler's weird beliefs.

Uh, dude, Hitler FOUNDED National Socialism.

Can you cope with the fact that the majority of the Nazi intelligentsia were much more doctrinaire evolutionists - just like you?

I'm not a doctrinaire evolutionist. Just opposed to deliberate ignorance.

143 posted on 10/22/2009 11:53:47 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; GodGunsGuts
you wanted your threads in the news forum, realize that having them located here means much more open guidelines than the Religion forum.

Thank you for clearing this up, Admin. I will no longer ask GGG why/how he continues to post Christian creationist apologetics in the "news" forum on FR. I understand now he simply asked and he got what he wanted - with a very fair caveat.

Please note, if I were one to hit the abuse button (I never have in 8 years), I could have done it on this GGG post from yesterday, which is merely an advertisement for a conference... Or this one which is another advertisement for a book.

I rarely venture into Religion for as we all know, the rules are slightly different there - which is fine by me.
144 posted on 10/22/2009 11:53:52 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dmz
So which evolutionist did Marx use as the foundation of his beliefs?

He was a philosopher. As such it was ideas, not people, upon which his thinking was based. So you ought to have asked which version of evolutionism.

At that time I don't think it is necessary to subdivide evolutionism and say Marx favored one above another. Though since his time, punk eek has clearly been identified with Marxism, over and against gradualistic evolutionism. (I.e, as reflected in the writings of the late Stephen J. Gould and Niles Eldredge.)

One could also mention the Soviet reliance on Lysenko and his strange allegiance to Lamarkism, with persecution of dissenters, such that Soviet biology research and prestige suffered lasting damage. But again that is after the fact - I can't think offhand why Marx would have wedded himself to Lamarck over and against other evolutionary theories. The key point, for Marx, was the denial of a Creator God and the assumption that 'morality' is a creation of whomever happens to be in power.

145 posted on 10/22/2009 11:56:15 AM PDT by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

What part of knock it off, regarding xcamel’s sobriety, do you not understand? Don’t try to sneak in one last shot under cover of acknowledgement.


146 posted on 10/22/2009 11:56:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970
So you ought to have asked which version of evolutionism.

So please, find us a published version of evolutionary theory that was present before Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto.

147 posted on 10/22/2009 11:58:35 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

==Please note, if I were one to hit the abuse button (I never have in 8 years)

You just did.


148 posted on 10/22/2009 11:59:57 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; wendy1946

Surely you know my position by now!

<><><><><><><

LOL. Of course I do and of course you saw right through me.

But I don’t think Wendy has a good grasp on what you think of self-professed Christians who think the earth is as much as 2 million years old (certainly no younger than 200K), and who do not believe that God created the earth in 6 literal 24 hour days, per a literal reading of Genesis.

Can you help a sister out?


149 posted on 10/22/2009 12:05:55 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

The concept of true communism goes all the way back to the Plymouth colony - and they all damned near starved to death. They were strict creationists too. (predating evolutionary science)


150 posted on 10/22/2009 12:16:18 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
"We already guessed that you have set yourself up against God."

I have set myself against evil disguised as God. God gave us intelligence, reason and the knowledge of the difference between good and evil. To refuse to accept and use those gifts is an insult to the Creator.

...for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable. Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience,

- Romans 11:28-30

151 posted on 10/22/2009 12:18:18 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
"I have set myself against evil disguised as God. God gave us intelligence, reason and the knowledge of the difference between good and evil. To refuse to accept and use those gifts is an insult to the Creator."

No, God gave us His Word to be obedient to. The knowledge of evil renders fallen intelligence and reason unreliable. To refuse to accept and obey the Word is an insult to the Creator.

"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."

2 Tim 3:16-17

152 posted on 10/22/2009 12:25:27 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: RightWingNilla
How do you do that strikeout thingy?

Here ya go: <strike>Text to strike</strike>

153 posted on 10/22/2009 12:26:26 PM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Gee....that’s because Dawrin had nothing to do with and no responsibility for the Holocaust.

I don’t blame every wrongful firearm death on the first guy to invent the firearm either.


154 posted on 10/22/2009 12:26:41 PM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with vegetarian T. rex within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

The key point, for Marx, was the denial of a Creator God and the assumption that ‘morality’ is a creation of whomever happens to be in power.
<><><><><><><><

I see. So it was not evolution that was the foundation of Marx’s theory. It was the denial of God and moral relativity.

Don’t need evolution for those 2 key points.


155 posted on 10/22/2009 12:38:57 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Ideas have consequences; the consequences of evolutionism obviously include a couple of hundred million dead bodies lying around and Europe being turned into a pig pen twice in one century by total wars.

Honestly, I have never read a statement on FR as un-credible as this one. Congrats.

156 posted on 10/22/2009 12:43:13 PM PDT by Tax Government (Mighty nuts from tiny Acorns grow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching"

At the time Abraham was commanded to sacrifice his son and Joshua was commanded to commit war crimes it was not yet scripture. They proved that they were no better than those who sacrificed children to Baal. Maybe you and I have different Gods. My God would not command you or me to commit an unconscionable act in His name.

157 posted on 10/22/2009 12:43:56 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry
Gee....that’s because Dawrin had nothing to do with and no responsibility for the Holocaust. I don’t blame every wrongful firearm death on the first guy to invent the firearm either.

That's because, per a site GGG links to all the time, association like that is a propaganda tactic.

http://creationsafaris.com/crevbd.htm

Whenever you see it, again, per GGG's own creation website, you know it is 'Baloney'.

Association (transfer)
Definition:  Associating what you want to promote with something people like, or something you want to criticize with something people dislike.
Examples, negative:  My opponent is just like Hitler. Lyndon Johnson’s anti-Goldwater TV commercial showing a little girl picking a flower followed by an atomic bomb explosion, implying his opponent was trigger-happy Calling someone who disagrees with quotas a racist. Listing creationism alongside pseudosciences like astrology, spiritism and ESP: “...to require teachers to give serious consideration to creationism is as unjustified as requiring them to teach other doctrines – such as astrology, alchemy and phrenology...”

...again, just using GGG's side's own definition.

158 posted on 10/22/2009 12:44:15 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Natufian

Marx wasn’t responsible for Stalin’s mass starvation of Ukranians,either,but his noxious ideas made it easier for the commies to “justify” it.


159 posted on 10/22/2009 12:46:54 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Do you often cite serial adulterers as authorities on morality?

In the particular case of Gingrich the guy has something profound and real to say. Chuck Darwin on the other hand basically claimed that the only moral law in nature was "survival of the fittest" and that basic idea has gotten tens of millions of people killed since Chuck's time. Choosing between the two is or should be fairly easy.

160 posted on 10/22/2009 12:53:30 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson