The "Oathkeepers" Need to Be Put in Check - Now (They (Dems) Are Getting Nervous)

Associated Content ^ | October 20, 2009 | Jeff Musall

[DNME]

Folks, here’s something to think about, in all seriousness.

Under what circumstances would the gummint declare martial law? I can think of a few, starting with ANY national emergency that Zero can drum up.

Now, would you want FEDERAL troops marching down your street? STATE (National Guard) troops? Troops from a neighboring state, sent to “help” us?

Or a militia made up of your neighbors, keeping the peace in your home town?

I think forming a militia NOW is the smartest thing we could possibly do!!

[stephenjohnbanker]

B U M P

[stephenjohnbanker]

I recently joined them. Great bunch of guys.

[rae4palin]

Amen, brother. Patriots shoulder to shoulder. (and well armed)

[Kickass Conservative]

Reminds me of the good old days when we shot Commies instead of electing them.

[Borderline]

"Its generally not advisable to get involved with groups like this. The government can play real hardball and most of the fellow travelers in these groups, despite their big talk, literally wet their pants when when the Feds come knocking. Frankly, its funny to watch."

Fraid your comments kind of rile me up. There are some things worth standing up for - Worth some risk. Although it sure seems to me you have not a clue what something like that might be about. Try reading about John Hancock. Good place to learn where your own personal lines in the sand might be drawn.

      

[mojitojoe]

Frankly, you sound like you need to buy some knee pads.

[kitchen]

Who could imagine the number of Xenophons that would rise up in the face of such perfidy?

Ah-choo!

[dcwusmc]

Hi, Matt.

Neil, PING!

[dcwusmc]

Yes. Go look over the site. You’d be welcome. It’s active duty, reserve, veterans, retirees, and law enforcement, past and present. Plus anyone else who takes an oath to protect the Constitution (and by extension, the American People, the source of the Constitution).

[dcwusmc]

No one’s talking revolution, only RESTORATION.

[SuperLuminal]

Oath bump

[wolfcreek]

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Alinsky’s rules for radicals.

[BlueLancer]

"I wonder if there’s a place for an old sub sailor in that outfit?"

Well, the rest of us are expected to bring our own weapons ...

Can you bring your own submarine?

[smile]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESISTOR

Swear allegiance to the flag, whatever flag they offer;
Never hint at what you really feel.
Teach the children quietly for, someday, sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stood still.

Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK)

[clee1]

Yep, we have the need. Welcome FRiend.

clee1, OK

[clee1]

www.oathkeepers.org

[mad_as_he$$]

Well there bed wetter Jeff, try and take my guns and rights away. You will understand how freemen react.

[sport]

Don’t worry about the officers and NCOs on active duty and with sexret and higher clearances not joining.

TI was talking with one a while back and his comment was”I feel the same as you” that meant to me that when the balloon went up, he and those like him would be there wiht us.

From reading and studying history, I believe that now it is a matter of when not if. The reason is that obama and his gang including the media organizations have started believeing, like all tyrants,their own lies. And one of the lies they believe is that we are cowards, we are soft, and we will not fight.

Like a train way down the track it is coming. Meanwhile just clean, practice, and pray is all I can say.

[clee1]

Wolf are just as good, IMHO.

[BulletBobCo]

Seems to me that OathKeepers will have a little bit of difficulty getting active duty personnel to join an organization like this. Especially officers and others with secret or higher security clearances.

Even though an organization may have a mission statement to defend the constitution and to safeguard freedoms, the government may view the OathKeepers as an anti-government group.

This is a very fine line that I doubt active duty military would dare to cross.

Security Clearance Form SF 86:

http://www.opm.gov/Forms/pdf_fill/sf86.pdf

See page 17, Section 29 Association Record, Question B.

Thanks for pointing this out. Those belonging to this organization are just the tip of the iceberg.