President Obama Believes Fox News Is Not a ‘Legitimate News Organization’ (video)

CNN ^ | Oct. 18, 2009

[the anti-liberal]

This is a very convoluted statement by him and not well formed. This gives us some insight into the simple mindedness of an individual who sits in the US Oval Office. It also gives us insight into the kind of things this administration has decided is important.

It has decided that the portrayal of the royal family to the public is important. This is what it devotes time and resources to.

If individuals in the conservative party were to decide that their portrayal to the public for public consumption was important, they would gain greater control of the public image consumed by that public. If they were to decide that they want to portray themselves as the best hope for fiscal and social health and strength individually and collectively, for example, they could create a narrative with an emphasizes on those qualities. These qualities could then be repeatedly associated, via an intentionally established narrative for public consumption, with those specific individuals and with the conservative party generally.

Not only would such an approach undermine the clumsily unfolding narrative of the Barack regime, a narrative of personal and collective financial and social psychopathy, it would provide a tangible and much needed pointer to a way forward, past this psychotic anti-capitalist marxist morass of stagflation that we're currently stuck in and toward a bright, prosperous, and healthy future, preferably in a vivid way such that a newly optimistic public could get emotionally and intellectually behind it. This would go a long way toward strengthening the public perception of and support for the conservative party and those specific individuals in an emotionally and intellectually positive and satisfying way, drawing them to provide monetary and material support.

If there are any individuals in the conservative party who want that role and are willing to lead the way on it, I suggest now is the time.

I suggest a vote of no confidence, and that new leadership is needed.

[Nosterrex]

I guess he is saying that it takes a phony to know a phony.

[Publius6961]

So FOX is "perspective" and CNN is "acceptable" news?
Ummm. OK.

Is this a strategic step to outlawing or controlling "perspective?"

Good luck with that.

[Signalman]

But MSNBC is, right Obama?

[alecqss]

Oh well, Obama surely believes darnedest things.

[alecqss]

As usual, he looks so humbled.

[shadowcat]

stroke to youbammieboy

[lilycicero]

I’m always too late to read the “removed comments” ping...

[Chode]

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

He may want to choose his words more wisely I think.

[The Wizard]

sorry, I’ll need a better, more reliable source about Fox news...