Posted on 10/11/2009 8:18:07 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
My M16 failed NEW right out of the crate and never got a round thru it... got in trouble when I told Sargeant to get me a 12 gauge.
My M16 failed NEW right out of the crate and never got a round thru it... got in trouble when I told Sargeant to get me a 12 gauge.
this was during the CARTER REGIME.. I didn’t last long..
Sure the M16A1 I had in Basic required a lot (and I mean a lot) of babying to keep it firing, but the A2 I had at all of my permanent duty stations worked fantastic, no matter how much I abused it. The M249s that I used worked great, when belt fed, but heaven forbid you stuck a magazine in the side of it! I was lucky to get off 2 rounds before it jammed.
Robert McNamara from hell is still killing American soldiers due to the M-16/M4 abortion.
It is a poor choice for desert or jungle warfare.
I’ve heard that in desert conditions oil lube is a dust/dirt magnet and a dry lube is the only lubricant that should be used.
The H & K 416 is a good solution.
I bought a Springfield M1A based it’s reputation for reliability even when thrown in mud, dirt and run over.
I have purposely not cleaned it for my own testing purposes for the last 8 months.
No problem and I have used So. African and Russian surplus, just because they are dirty and oily.
No problems and I have put National Match in. They are great but at $2.50 per round I don’t need that kind of accuracy.
I will thouroghly clean it for Christmas but, I am pretty confident in its reliability and performance.
The 1934 gun law, and every one restricting rights since, have made it so the govt designs weapons, before that private inventors did so. Figure it out, the govt screws everything up. Ban machine guns, no one will make them....at least great ones with innovation.
“Figure it out, the govt screws everything up. “
Not everything. The M1 Garand was designed by civil servant, John C. Garand, at the Springfield Armory.
Interesting. Granted I was USAF and we almost never carried weapons unless you were security forces or deployed to a combat zone, but every year when I qualified, I had no issues with the m16. I am sure it was not the best gun, my sec forces friends all had their favorites.
To see what a .223 rifle can be, Google the Daewoo DR-200.
1. Minute of angle accuracy.
2. AK-47 gas action.
3. M-4 upper/lower design.
For a “mouse gun” caliber, it is arguably the best available. Unlike our “Matty Mattell” guns, the DR-200 works and keeps on working.
The other primary cause of jams is an over-wound magazine latch spring that prevents magazines from being fully latched in. Especially on three shot burst, the mag works slightly loose and the later rounds may misfeed.
Most armorers think that the tighter the latch, the better. That's generally true except when you are in a firefight and swapping mags in a hurry, a softer latch will more likely allow the mag to bottom out and stay tight.
Bottom line is that worn and dirty weapons may work fine on the range but not in battle.
On a purely personal basis, I always liked the simplicity and reliability of the AK design. KISS - Keep It Simple, Stupid.
Not only is the AK a reliable weapon, its cartridge has the same ballistics as a .30-30 Winchester round and has VERY powerful, knock-down power. I tested one recently at the rifle range and it is a reliable and accurate weapon within 300 yards. I was using just its standard iron sights with adjustable range on the rear sight and had excellent results.
Huh? Tell that the Eugene Stoner... However, the government DID override a few of his specs on the original design of the M16, some good (IMHO - the forward assist), most disastrous ( different powder for the ammo, the concept of a "self cleaning" weapon, getting rid of the chrome lined chamber).
Mark
Barrel overheating could be the cause of a number of the malfunctions. Talking to Korean vets who had to weather mass Chinese assaults on their positions I’ve been told that their BAR barrel was melting and rounds were firing out at the point of the bend.
Weapons malfunction is not a new problem but one that needs to be investigated for the sake of our troops. I’m not a big fan of fully auto main battle rifles. Even the M-249 should be used in bursts. Is the M-4 fully auto or is there a three round burst on it like the M-16? I think that was one of the best enhancements between the A-1 and A-2. Fully auto is inaccurate and can cause malfunctions much more rapidly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.