Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Respected Democrat Encourages 'Naive' Obama to Emulate Bush; Honored Vet Says 'Stan Not 'Nam
Sunday, October 11, 2009 | Kristinn

Posted on 10/11/2009 11:34:51 AM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: kristinn

bttt.


21 posted on 10/11/2009 12:29:28 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

How dare he attempt to advise a Nobel Prize winner...


22 posted on 10/11/2009 12:30:22 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Kerrey wasn’t as bad as Clinton would have been, I think. We might have been better off if he had won the Demo nomination in ‘92.


23 posted on 10/11/2009 12:32:25 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
And if I weren't a supporter, my judgment would be harsher.

Sounds borderline racist to me.
24 posted on 10/11/2009 12:33:36 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Knock me over with a feather.

Evidently Bob Kerry didn’t get the memo - you don’t advise the One on military matters....or on any matter......unless it fits in with the Obomunist Agenda....and this advice doesn’t. He’ll learn soon enough.


25 posted on 10/11/2009 12:35:56 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt (Obama's Deathcare ---- many will suffer and/or die unnecessarily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

As the respected Sherlock Holmes said about one detective he dealt with, Bob Kerry has always been the pick of a bad lot. I think he does have some integrity and no one can accuse him of disloyalty. There is no doubt that we would have done better with him rather than Slickmeister!


26 posted on 10/11/2009 12:38:54 PM PDT by gbscott1954 (Sarah 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
If anyone recalls, Bob Kerrey was the one who called Clinton "an unusually good liar."

I guess he can call them at times.

27 posted on 10/11/2009 12:49:01 PM PDT by truthkeeper ("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I am going to copy /paste this article to every lib I can find


28 posted on 10/11/2009 12:52:17 PM PDT by reefdiver (So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

ping


29 posted on 10/11/2009 12:56:05 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I like this part where he calls out the defeatists in the Democratic party and the Obama administration as, well, defeatists:

Instead we are being asked to withdraw by American leaders who begin their analysis with the presumption that victory is not possible. They seem to want to ensure defeat by leaving at the very moment when our military leader on the ground has laid out a coherent and compelling strategy for victory.

30 posted on 10/11/2009 1:12:50 PM PDT by kristinn (A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The first rats are beginning to document words that distance them from their lightworker. Just in case.


31 posted on 10/11/2009 1:20:16 PM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Between, Kerrey and Dianne Feinstein, there looks to be trouble brewing in the party.

It's funny, since they last got away with it in Vietnam, no matter what the polls show, those with most at stake with the voters seem to end up voting for victory. They may not talk like that all the time, but most politicians have figured out that deep down the American people don't like to lose wars.

32 posted on 10/11/2009 1:30:31 PM PDT by kristinn (A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

ping for future reference


33 posted on 10/11/2009 1:34:40 PM PDT by Wife of D28Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Thank you for your correction and analysis!

. . . And thank you President Bush for your courage and vision — you are missed!


34 posted on 10/11/2009 1:53:14 PM PDT by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Poe White Trash
>>> This war is not Vietnam. The Taliban are not popular and have very little support other than what they secure through terror. <<<

Am I to suppose that the Vietcong WERE popular and had lots of support in South Vietnam and Cambodia, aside from what they secured through terror?

This doesn’t accord with the history I’ve read, especially for the period of time after Tet.

Yeah. I'm no expert on the subject. But I also suspect we had that war won, and allowed a traitor ridden Congress to piss of the victory.

The North Vietnamese threw everything they had into three major offensives: '68, '72 (IIRC) and '75.

They got badly beaten the first two times, and only succeeded on the third occasion because by then the American Congress had cut off nearly all aid, and fatally weakened morale by otherwise undermining and deligitimizing the South Vietnamese government and armed forces at every opportunity.

Of course this will never be widely admitted until long after the last morsel of flesh from the last 60's "New Left" radical has been expelled from the south end of a north bound worm.

35 posted on 10/11/2009 1:56:41 PM PDT by Stultis (Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; Democrats always opposed waterboarding as torture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Whoa! Feinstein is also bashing the Messiah about Afghanistan. I'd say trouble is boiling over the top.

Americans don't want to lose this war and they don't want our brave troops killed while the pseudo-Commander in Chief "dithers."

36 posted on 10/11/2009 2:11:23 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
From what I have seen, President Obama has the same ability to step outside the swirl of public opinion and make the right decision....

I have to disagree with Sen. Kerrey on this.

Obama does not know how to decide anything.

He only knows how to read what is put up on the teleprompter for him to read.

Obama is but a puppet with we don't don't know who all behind him pulling his strings.

37 posted on 10/11/2009 2:24:23 PM PDT by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Wrong Kerrey. This is Nebraska's Bob Kerrey, not that loser from Massachusetts, John ‘F’in Kerry.
38 posted on 10/11/2009 2:26:19 PM PDT by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“It’s a sad state of affairs when Saturday Night Live gets more attention from the media when it comes to criticizing Obama on the war than someone with Bob Kerrey’s qualifications.”

As Mrs. RQSR has said in the past, the MSM is so up Obama’s tail-end, they’ll never report such critiques as that of the likes of Bob Kerrey, and what strikes me about that is how their adulation, their protectionism if you will of this President is actually undermining his Presidency.

I love it.


39 posted on 10/11/2009 2:54:21 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gbscott1954

I have to wonder if Kerrey had the same love from the media an Hollywood elites as Clinton did. Perhaps he would have been less electable Though a second Bush/Quayle term would probably have meant Republicans would never have taken a majority in Congress.

If Kerrey had been elected though I think he would not have weakened our defenses as much as Clinton did


40 posted on 10/11/2009 2:55:29 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson