Posted on 09/21/2009 7:03:17 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
This is a porton of Orly’s reply to denial:
“The fact that the court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate ‘chain of command’ alleged above not to address [the questions,]” the motion said.
The motion described the judge’s decision as “manifestly unjust and incorrect.”
“Dem’s fightin’ werds” ! ! ! Hope it doesn’t back fire !
Has any lawyer communicated to ORLY of this ? is she aware of this ?
What is it you think “Rule 11 discovery” means?
Kathleen Turner was a major babe. She hasn’t weathered well, alcohol problems.
I can’t help you with the other movie, not ringing any bells.
She also has rheumatoid arthritis.
Owww, that’ll do it.
PING
According what I heard and seen, she says she has a slew of other attorneys working for her. I can't picture this a one-man-(woman)-show, her being all over the map???
However, it is good to know, at least, that we have so many competent armchair keyboard jurisprudence commandos here on FR weighing in on this case to "slap" down a foreign and not at least a female PATRIOT, who has balls. I sent her 50 bucks last month and will do same this month. You all go and do the same if you want her to succeed, instead of tear her down!!!
An “After-Birther”???
Don't we now live in times where one has to be rude to get to the truth???
Remember the tactics the usurper himself used with the help of the Chicago "Godfather" gang to advance into the Illinois State house by crushing his opponent who had sealed records, hmmm!!!
Sorry, pal ... when it comes to legal maneuvering (and repeated bungling of same), Orly Taitz has amply demonstrated that she is her own worst enemy.
That is what I would call, your typically chauvinistic misguided opinion!!!
I believe it is rather difficult to underestimate most judges in any capacity, but especially in their capacity to default on the side of morality vs. legally pedantic process. Hence I believe it is simple to overestimate this judge's dedication to "doing the right thing".
Yes, it’s a pretty awful disease.
This is me, not giving a tinker’s damn about your hysterics.
Some of the posters here are ACORN shills. I hope in court she has attorneys helping her. She also should have incorporated Leo’s suggestions on her case with Judge Carter. Leo found a huge opportunity there.
I am concerned that she will not listen to what experienced and competent attorneys tell her.
No top quality attorney would get near this case if they wanted to survive in the law profession and in human life in general.
Rondog could help answer this question as he is in contact with Rhodes.
This has been mentioned on FR.
I see you found the thread... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.