Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military growing impatient with Obama on Afghanistan
McClatchy Newspapers ^ | Friday, 09.18.09 | NANCY A. YOUSSEF

Posted on 09/19/2009 7:09:27 AM PDT by MestaMachine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
Sidebar: Similar stories:

•Obama has yet to define U.S. objectives in Afghanistan
Obama has yet to define U.S. objectives in AfghanistanAs the Obama administration and Congress begin a heated debate about how many more American troops to send to Afghanistan, military observers, soldiers on the ground there and some top Pentagon officials are warning that dispatching even tens of thousands more soldiers and Marines might not ensure success.

Some even fear that deploying more U.S. troops, especially in the wake of a U.S. airstrike last week that killed and wounded scores of Afghan civilians, would convince more Afghans that the Americans are occupiers rather than allies and relieve the pressure on the Afghan government to improve its own security forces.

The heart of the problem, soldiers fighting in Afghanistan and some officials in Washington told McClatchy Newspapers, is that neither Barack Obama's White House nor the Pentagon has clearly defined America's mission in Afghanistan. As a result, some soldiers in the field said, they aren't sure what their objectives are.

1 posted on 09/19/2009 7:09:27 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Obama is trying to figure out how to lose in the worst possible way.


2 posted on 09/19/2009 7:12:20 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; 444Flyer

PING!
This is unconscionable! o is riding his media horse to 5, count them, FIVE Sunday TV News shows to talk about deathcare and evil insurance, while our Troops wait...and DIE!!!


3 posted on 09/19/2009 7:13:24 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

He is MURDERING our Troops. This cannot stand. The military MUST do something!


4 posted on 09/19/2009 7:15:07 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Obama is trying to figure out how to lose in the worst possible way.

Kinda like the NY Mets

5 posted on 09/19/2009 7:15:51 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Obama is not willing to do what needs to be done in order to win.


6 posted on 09/19/2009 7:16:45 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Part of his plan to de-develop the USA.


7 posted on 09/19/2009 7:16:54 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

This Marxist and traitor is putting the country in harms way more than just the examples you’ve indicated.


8 posted on 09/19/2009 7:16:58 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

As Obama waffles, SOLDIERS DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


9 posted on 09/19/2009 7:18:39 AM PDT by bt579
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Right- the TOTUS plans to dither with “his war” for 12-18 months as many brave Americans (and allies) risk their lives and DIE waiting for him to figure out what to do

God forbid the marxists should employ Petraeus or any other “Bush” advisor

Gates as SecDef, you are a massive sellout. Shame on you, sir.

There is NO curent govt official now worthy of issuing orders to risk life to even the lowest ranking American soldier.

God Bless and protect them, so many are just teenagers and others, on their 3-4-5th tours i that hellish place as the American values they fight for are under vicious attack right at home


10 posted on 09/19/2009 7:22:04 AM PDT by silverleaf (If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The man is a clueless I-N-C-O-M-P-E-T-E-N-T

Somebody in Congress needs to get up on their hindlegs and demand a coherent policy from the White House.


11 posted on 09/19/2009 7:22:32 AM PDT by Walrus (My congressman is toast in 2010 --- how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
When I heard Barry talking about SFC Monti, I could not help but think that the artillery strike would have been ‘second guessed’ in today's (Barry's) military and the story would have had a far worse outcome.
12 posted on 09/19/2009 7:23:30 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

might be a good time for career military to retire....

like they did in droves under Clinton.


13 posted on 09/19/2009 7:24:06 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

obama doesnt think we are spending enough


14 posted on 09/19/2009 7:25:44 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Obama is not willing to do what needs to be done in order to win.

I have come to believe this myself. As the someone said in the article, dithering is worse than 10 car bombs.

The Taliban is watching our European Allies pussy out. They can read the Fringe Media and see that support for Obama's war in Afghanistan is flagging. And they just saw what we did to the Czechs and Poles.

Pulling out is bad-- staying in but not fighting to win really will make Afghanistan "Obama's Vietnam."

15 posted on 09/19/2009 7:26:14 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Obama is not willing to do what needs to be done in order to win.

I have come to believe this myself. As the someone said in the article, dithering is worse than 10 car bombs.

The Taliban is watching our European Allies pussy out. They can read the Fringe Media and see that support for Obama's war in Afghanistan is flagging. And they just saw what we did to the Czechs and Poles.

Pulling out is bad-- staying in but not fighting to win really will make Afghanistan "Obama's Vietnam."

16 posted on 09/19/2009 7:26:14 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Obama is not willing to do what needs to be done in order to win.

In HIS view, he is winning by weakening this country in every possible way. Noice that he won't reveal his long term vision for America because his goal is to tear it down.

17 posted on 09/19/2009 7:27:19 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

The teleprompter needs to show some leadership here. Either support a plan for victory or get out now. Anything in between can lead to another Vietnam. I would greatly prefer a path to victory, but it’s likely to be costly. Mountainous terrain evens the playing field for friend and foe.

With recent events of the potential prosecution of CIA agents and former Bush attorneys, granting rights to terrorists, elimination of the “global war on terror,” and the scrapping of the Eastern Europe missle defense program; I suspect our TOTUS will get out now. He doesn’t want to repeat the mistakes of LBJ, nor, evidently, does he care about the potentially weakened image of American resolve against our enemies.

I’ve always believed that America is far safer from a position of strength. Our enemies need to respect and fear us— especially the crazy ones. Although I much prefer a victory in Afghanistan, a “get out now” decision won’t bother me as much as a half-hearted play-not-to-lose strategy.

I want America to succeed even if it benefits our president. Our soldiers bleed no matter who’s in office.


18 posted on 09/19/2009 7:27:48 AM PDT by foobarred (My post is less racist than your teleprompter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

We simply cannot afford to lose in Afghanistan.

The consequences would be devastating to us.


19 posted on 09/19/2009 7:28:11 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

We’ve already suffered a serious setback on the missile shield debacle which is sending the wrong message to our enemies and scaring our friends.


20 posted on 09/19/2009 7:30:22 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson