Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fresh Fossil Feather Nanostructures (fossils make far better sense w/o assumption of million of year
ICR News ^ | September 16, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 09/16/2009 9:03:13 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-336 last
To: GunRunner

Have a nice wedding and listen to that girl! ;)


321 posted on 09/18/2009 8:43:46 AM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

When will the evos realize that Creationists and IDers are not the same?
________

You are correct.

Those in the set ID are a subset of those in the set creationist.


322 posted on 09/18/2009 8:54:24 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

when I argue with liberals at harmony-central.com


LOL. Arguing with liberals at harmony-central.

The politics of stomp boxes and electric guitars.

The use of a stratocaster is a sure sign of evo-atheism, but a Les Paul ids you as a creationist. That’s what gets us evo-atheists, the 60 cycle hum of a single coil pickup.


323 posted on 09/18/2009 9:08:59 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

yup...good way to put it...”arrogant godless turds”.

It appears the ones that have been here for awhile are simply too incompetent to get themselves banned like Coyoteman did! LOL!
______

Wow. Puts the lie to the notion that it is only the evos who have potty mouth, and who can do no better than to name call creationists.

You and yours can easily hold your own in that department.


324 posted on 09/18/2009 9:22:49 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The Raelian belief that space aliens got life started on Earth is perfectly consistent with Darwood’s evo-religious creation myth.
_______

As it is also consistent with Intelligent Design.


325 posted on 09/18/2009 9:28:48 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Missing the point.

FR isn’t a bash creationism/Christianity/conservatism site, like so many evos are desperate to do anywhere and elsewhere and when they go over the line here...they’re gone.

And there really are a handful of evos that do just that, yet are too incompetent not only to get themselves banned but are wholly unaware of who they are...what FR is all about...etc. etc. etc.


326 posted on 09/18/2009 12:18:48 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

I’m not missing the point when you refer to evos as ‘arrogant godless turds’ at the same time you are decrying how we evos engage in name-calling (post 20 of the Trio of Darwin film thread).

Neither side of this argument has any right to the moral high ground as it relates to debating techniques.

Cheers and have nice weekend tpanther. I see adult beverages in my near future and will be happy to raise my glass to the freeper crevo threads.


327 posted on 09/18/2009 1:49:51 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“And there really are a handful of evos that do just that, yet are too incompetent not only to get themselves banned but are wholly unaware of who they are...what FR is all about...etc. etc. etc.”

Speaking of incompetence, Do you ever notice that these threads always end up with whining about what people say and how they say it, and hardly ever with discussion of the “incompetence” of the “creation science” that starts the thread? Do you ever wonder why?


328 posted on 09/19/2009 7:13:37 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: goodusername
I saw some of that, maybe they have expertise that doesn't come with a title. Those “dentists” are not the majority of scientists mentioned. The list is the list. Would you rather I removed ones that may not have sounded as expert as others just to make the list LOOK better? THE POINT is that MANY SCIENTISTS agree with the idea of a young earth. If it was a majority we wouldn't be discussing it would we?
Open your little mind and consider another point of view.
I apologize (only IF you are offended) for the “little” comment. I almost took it out but I just couldn't help myself, the devil made me do it. BTW, it's called honesty and humor.
329 posted on 09/19/2009 10:29:20 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Speaking of incompetence, Do you ever notice that these threads always end up with whining about what people say and how they say it, and hardly ever with discussion of the “incompetence” of the “creation science” that starts the thread? Do you ever wonder why?

No, I stopped wondering the very first week I was here when I figured out liberals project alot.

That and spewed up things like "religious attacks on science" each and every time their cult of evoluttion was questioned.

330 posted on 09/21/2009 1:34:22 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“That and spewed up things like “religious attacks on science” each and every time their cult of evoluttion was questioned.”

You sure do whine a lot for someone who likes to call OTHER people “liberal”.

There is no way for religion to attack science - and frankly no way for science to attack true faith.

The problem you have and many other “creation science folk” have is that you cannot fathom the coexistence of faith and science, unless it is sourced by one of those crackpot organizations that 3G always posts from.

Accept the coexistence of faith and science, and accept that scientists (real ones, not those crackpot guys) are fulfilling their God-given destinies in search of scientific truth. Have faith that God’s Truth will not be threatened by mere science as it meanders on it’s quest for man-made knowledge.

Now quit whining you liberal and fly right.


331 posted on 09/21/2009 1:50:27 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: dmz

catching up....hope you had a good weekend also.


332 posted on 09/21/2009 2:09:42 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
There is no way for religion to attack science - and frankly no way for science to attack true faith.

Apparently your memo to your liberal friends just isn't getting out, and it's not my side that resorts to suing and shouting down any and all debate, Einstein.

333 posted on 09/21/2009 2:26:30 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“Apparently your memo to your liberal friends just isn’t getting out, and it’s not my side that resorts to suing and shouting down any and all debate, Einstein.”

No, those are YOUR liberal friends that are doing all that, Mr. Mega-Project-o-rama.

Funny that you invoke Einstein as the “de facto” standard of intellect, even in sarcasm......It seems that you folks are not as dense as you would have people believe, even for the lying liberals that you are.


334 posted on 09/21/2009 2:31:25 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

That’s some grip the cult has on you to actually believe that anyone on FR is going to buy that liberals haven’t hijacked science...

and that the creationists are the ones shutting down debate via multiple lawsuits, and various other tactics, etc..

Have fun with that!


335 posted on 09/21/2009 2:38:09 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“That’s some grip the cult has on you to actually believe that anyone on FR is going to buy that liberals haven’t hijacked science...”

You don’t understand much at all, do you? Science has not “grip” on anyone. All free-thinking individuals are able to participate. Influences come from all areas - gov’t is a big one, private research concerns as well. Even people, like the “creation science don’t-think-tanks” participate. In the end, it matters not who is the best funded (funding can help but it can’t make it into the scientific body of knowledge for long if it has no foundation in reason). It’s a giant self-correcting research machine. Your boys try to give their input - but they really can’t cut it with their “research” so it is discarded almost immediately when it has no science behind it.

You, of course, claim it’s because there’s been a “hijacking” or a “conspiracy” or a conflagration of “evil-godless-bastards” involving thousands or millions of conspirators. Or you could just accept that your “creation science” boys just can’t hang with the real men and women of science, and their crackpot ideas (with no actual science to back them up) gets it’s proper respect.

Millions of conspirators vs. a handful of paranoid scientific mediocrities. Which is more plausible?

You don’t really have to answer, but deep down you and your liberal “creation science” friends can’t talk your way out of the scientific playpen you’ve limited yourself to.

Your liberal denial of reality. Your liberal liberalness of lying liberalism. You and your liberal liberal liberals liberally liberalizing about liberating liberalism.

liberal liberal liberal, liberal liberal liberal liberal....liberal.

There, I put it in terms that you, the one-trick “liberal” pony that you are can understand......

And by the way, I think you’ve still used the word “liberal” on this thread more than I have....amazing as that may seem.


336 posted on 09/21/2009 3:58:24 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-336 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson