Skip to comments.
Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
WND ^
| 9/8/09
| staff
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 861-871 next last
To: FARS
Denied or not, are you sure Nakazako did not recuse himself? I had this reported to me from inside the courtroom as having happened. No. Not according to the judges' order. Link Early discovery temporarily denied! Till the MTD is accepted or denied. This has to follow a logical sequence and Judge Carter is not going to allow instrusion into evidence till it becomes a legal option or necessity. The need would disappear if he decides to dismiss the case.
Agreed. But it was a motion submitted by Taitz and it was denied.
You are showing a strong bias against Orly, why?
Because I think she's an inept boob.
To: Mimi3
If you read my earlier posts, you would see that I think Taitz has accomplished a great deal and we owe her a great deal of honor and thanks. That said, it is important that another attorney get involved so the procedural stuff won't be a stumbling block.
Since you cited the Bible, I will mention that since Moses was a poor speaker, God used Aaron to speak for Moses. This case is similar.
On can readily see that Judge Carter wants this case heard on the merits in an expeditious manner and Taitz working by herself will not permit that to happen.
Again; Taitz has accomplished a great deal and when it is all over, she will receive the recognition she deserves.
To: Non-Sequitur; pissant
Well now, looks like another day of empowering and enabling the Dear Comrade begins for you, eh?
Have you taken the 0bama pledge yet? You might as well since you're already proving that you are indeed his 'servant'.
Have a nice day chinslurp.
543
posted on
09/09/2009 4:48:51 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
To: SeaHawkFan
Well said, and great points FRiend!
544
posted on
09/09/2009 4:51:17 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
To: pissant
From that court’s mouth to God’s ear ... dare we hope? (I dare!)
545
posted on
09/09/2009 5:17:11 AM PDT
by
Category Four
(Joy, Fun, the Joke Proper, and Flippancy ... Flippancy is the best of all.)
To: FARS
"To:
MHGinTN; All
Good for you! This guy is rejoicing at every possible set-back and decrying any positive aspects. Ever more and more likely to be an Obamabot troll."
----------------------
Now you get it. They are trolls that's what they do. ;-)
To: pissant
He has already admitted to snorting coke and smoking dope. Now if he would only come clean about where he was born.
547
posted on
09/09/2009 5:26:41 AM PDT
by
Gabrial
(ObamaCare: The efficiency of the Post Office, the compassion of the IRS, the costs of the Pentagon)
To: mkjessup
Well now, looks like another day of empowering and enabling the Dear Comrade begins for you, eh? Just replying to mail from yesterday...and laughing at the comments I missed over night.
Have you taken the 0bama pledge yet? You might as well since you're already proving that you are indeed his 'servant'.
Not yet. Can you send me your copy?
Have a nice day chinslurp.
You too, butthead.
To: Red Steel
This guy is rejoicing at every possible set-back and decrying any positive aspects. What positive aspects are there to decry? Taitz went in there yesterday and every motion she submitted was denied. She's split the plaintiffs into two completely disfunctional teams fighting the same suit. She's facing a hearing on the motion to dismiss in 30 days and I'm looking forward to reading her response. All in all I'd say nothing has changed and won't change until some time next month.
To: Non-Sequitur
I get the impression that attorney Kreep is not disfunctional. I see that he worked with Liberty Counsel on the marriage stuff in California. Liberty Counsel would not be working with a disfunctional attorney. If anything, it indicates that Kreep is more interested in the result than his personal glory.
To: mkjessup; Non-Sequitur
Non-Sequitur,
have you gotten the message yet that the kind of reasonable discussion that you are engaging in is offensive and not welcome on this thread or anywhere else?
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; All
Agree. I was addressing ONLY the idea that the speech sentence was some
Freudian slip, like when he admitted to Steponallofus that he was a Muslim.
There is no slip here, but I still suspect his citizenship. Well, Obama's well known for his Freudian slips.
Here's one where he slipped on the rug when reaching
to kiss King Abdullah's ass.
552
posted on
09/09/2009 6:14:56 AM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: Non-Sequitur
But the State of Hawaii did certify it to be a true copy of the original COLB. 474 posted on Monday, September 07, 2009 8:08:30 PM by Non-Sequitur I believe that with this post two days ago you have met your quota of certifiable prefabrications on this forum. You should take the rest of the week off.
553
posted on
09/09/2009 6:17:42 AM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: pissant
554
posted on
09/09/2009 6:30:44 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(Praying for -16 today.)
To: Non-Sequitur
I can easily picture you saying to the ravaged body of our dying Republic, “put some ice on that”.
You are truly pathetic.
555
posted on
09/09/2009 6:41:37 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
To: campaignPete R-CT
Non-Sequitur,
have you gotten the message yet that the kind of reasonable discussion 0bama-enabling prattle that you are engaging in is offensive and not welcome on this thread or anywhere else?
There you go Pete, fixed that right up for ya.
556
posted on
09/09/2009 6:43:41 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
To: mkjessup
I can easily picture you saying to the ravaged body of our dying Republic, put some ice on that. And you would trample the rule of law in your haste to take down one man. And once you've done that and made a mockery of the Constitution in the process - something you accuse Obama himself of doing - then what will you turn to for protection for yourself or the next person?
This is bigger that Obama or any single man or woman. This is the law, the foundation of our society. All I want is for it to be held to the strict letter. All you want is whatever it takes to cram your agenda through. By my way of thinking you're the pathetic one.
To: STARWISE
558
posted on
09/09/2009 6:50:38 AM PDT
by
danamco
To: Uncle Chip
I believe that with this post two days ago you have met your quota of certifiable prefabrications on this forum. You should take the rest of the week off. Nope. Having too much fun.
To: campaignPete R-CT
have you gotten the message yet that the kind of reasonable discussion that you are engaging in is offensive and not welcome on this thread or anywhere else? Some time ago. But if I abandon it then I let the loonies win and spread their nonsense unchallenged. Someone has to ask the questions that they don't want to have to answer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 861-871 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson