Skip to comments.
Arctic ice proves to be slippery stuff
telegraph.co.uk ^
| 05 Sep 2009
| Christopher Booker
Posted on 09/07/2009 8:24:00 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: AFPhys
What made me ponder the geograhy covered by $1 bills from Porkulus was that I just listened to
Reagan's first SOTU speech in '81 again to see some parallels into today and it is shocking to say the least.
Not three minutes into it Reagan stated that the national debt was close to a staggering 1,000,000,000,000 dollars. Then he went on to say if you had a stack $1000 bills in your hand only 4" high you'd be a millionaire. To pay the national debt (in 1981) you would need a stack of $1000 bills 67 miles into space.
Maybe there should be some language in the global warming bill to make currency white on one side so we could take all these bills getting printed by the fed and simply lay them on the highways, our lawns etc. to reduce the global temperature. /s.
41
posted on
09/08/2009 9:13:24 AM PDT
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: quantim
42
posted on
09/08/2009 10:14:48 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: aShepard
The scientists refer to that as the aerosol effect; they haven’t decided whether is a negative or positive effect overall but it is not part of the models being used.
43
posted on
09/08/2009 10:19:19 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: sig226
The Arctic ice average less than one meter; Greenland’s ice cap around 3,000m; and Antarctica’s closer to 4500m.
That’s a bunch of Slurpees.
44
posted on
09/08/2009 10:25:29 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: headstamp 2; Walkingfeather
Save the Whales
Collect the whole set
45
posted on
09/08/2009 10:35:36 AM PDT
by
razorback-bert
(We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
To: Old Professer
I found some statistical data on the Greenland ice somewhere and was able to estimate the volume of a rectangular prism from it, then calculate the effect if it was spread out over 70% of the Earth’s surface. I was very surprised that the climate change idiots had the right numbers. I expected a lie from them. But a lie filled with partial truths is still a lie.
46
posted on
09/08/2009 10:37:44 AM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
To: sig226
My point was the idea of that ice melting rapidly; if it has taken 30 years to have melted one meter of polar ice, then how many lifetimes will we have to endure to see them gone?
47
posted on
09/08/2009 11:26:29 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: AFPhys
>>The actual area able to be covered with 787 Billion one-dollar bills is about 2/3 the size of Connecticut. (8136 sq.km)
I’ll take all the bills outside Fairfield County. :D
48
posted on
09/08/2009 11:34:27 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Keep working serf, Zero's in charge)
To: Bob
49
posted on
09/08/2009 11:38:52 AM PDT
by
Eurotwit
To: aShepard
50
posted on
09/08/2009 11:39:47 AM PDT
by
Eurotwit
To: SamuraiScot
Gosh, what does the World Wrestling Federation know about this stuff, anyway? About the same as the World Wildlife Fund knows.
51
posted on
09/08/2009 5:24:46 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(American)
To: Old Professer
That’s a good point. 30 years = 1 meter. This is in a liquid environment that has more convection than ice packed in a glacier on land. The water in the Arctic Ocean is warmer than the ice layer, and therefore capable of transferring heat to the ice, and of carrying heat from the oceans in lower lattitudes. The glacial ice under Greenland and Antarctica can’t do that. It’s actually colder than the surface ice due to the lack of solar heating.
I have no idea how to formulate the equations, but it’s worth considering.
52
posted on
09/08/2009 8:27:51 PM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson