Brain: Shaped By Experiences ("no greater testimony that we are fearfully and wonderfully made”)

Answers Magazine ^ | October-December 2009 | Dr. David A. DeWitt

[ElectricStrawberry]

So why has only God the Father and God the Spirit been mentioned as of Genesis 1:26..........and “God the Son” has not been mentioned and hadn’t even been born yet?

Was Jesus Christ, the Son of God, NOT born a little over 2000 years ago?

[GodGunsGuts]

The point is that we learn that the Godhead is plural in Genesis. You must go elsewhere in the Bible to learn the identity of each person of the triune Godhead. If you are interested, the following Bible verses are a great place to start:

http://www.geocities.com/rgl466/scripture-supports-the-trinity.html

[ElectricStrawberry]

I see....the Son is always around, just not incarnate.

So, if “God” is taken for granted always to mean “God the triune”.....why mention “God’s Spirit” in Gen 1:2 AT ALL???

[GodGunsGuts]

You could say the same thing about the federal government. There are lots of ways to refer to the same, some ways are more general, some ways are more specific to each branch. Each branch is a distinct entity, and can be refered to as such, and yet all three are one.

[ElectricStrawberry]

You’d think that if I were to know that the triune existed by the time Gen 1:26 came around....they’d have mentioned more than just 2 of the 3.

The way it reads is that God did all the “doing/Creating” and then Man was made in the image of God and the Spirit....which would make sense.

[UCANSEE2]

Where does the author provide any evidence to support this statement” I believe nothing provides greater testimony than the brain to how we are “fearfully and wonderfully made.?"

The author said "I BELIEVE", not "THIS IS PROOF".

There is a big difference between those two.

I BELIEVE that you have nothing better to do than criticize any kind of Creationism post by GGG.

That doesn't PROVE anything, however.

[Ira_Louvin]

Exactly what is it that “provides greater testimony”?

Is it the author’s religious beliefs or scientific evidence?

If is scientific evidence what evidence does he cite to support his assertion?

I am not asking for proof I am simply asking what is the scientific evidence the author cited to support his belief?

[UCANSEE2]

Exactly what is it that “provides greater testimony”?

The layout and design of the brain. Didn't you read the whole sentence?

Is it the author’s religious beliefs or scientific evidence?

It would seem to be a combination of both

If is scientific evidence what evidence does he cite to support his assertion?

Read the whole article.

I am not asking for proof

Yes you are.

I am simply asking what is the scientific evidence the author cited to support his belief?

Which is proof you are asking for proof. It's hard to prove something like 'greater testimony', especially if you don't define exactly what you mean, or exactly what you think he means.

Do that, and then your question has more meaning.

[Ira_Louvin]

I did read the entire article and none of the articles listed in the footnotes support his assertion.

So what scientic evidence did the author cite to support his assertion?

The question is not that difficult.