Posted on 09/06/2009 5:33:18 PM PDT by thouworm
Relevant to the health care bill:
Michelle Obamas Patient-Dumping Scheme
###
The First Lady helped create a notorious program that dumped poor patients on community hospitals, yet the national media ignore the story. Imagine if her husband were a Republican.
The University of Chicago Medical Center has received a good deal of justly opprobrious press over its policy of redirecting low-income patients to community hospitals while reserving its own beds for well-heeled patients requiring highly profitable procedures.
Substantial coverage was given to a recent indictment of the program by the American College of Emergency Physicians. ACEPs president, Dr. Nick Jouriles, released a statement suggesting that the initiative comes dangerously close to patient dumping, a practice made illegal by the Emergency Medical Labor and Treatment Act, and reflected an effort to cherry pick wealthy patients over poor.
Oddly absent from most of the unflattering press coverage of UCMCs patient-dumping scheme is any mention of the role our new First Lady played in devising the program. A laudable exception has been the Chicago Sun-Times, which reported last August that Michelle Obama currently on unpaid leave from her $317,000-a-year job as a vice president of the prestigious hospital helped create the program.
On the rare occasions when other news media have bothered to connect the Urban Health Initiative to its glamorous creator, they have attempted to whitewash this tawdry program. Typical of such disingenuous coverage was a story in the Washington Post, which described it as an innovative program to steer the patients to existing neighborhood clinics.
But no amount of journalistic lipstick can hide the reality that Mrs. Obamas initiative is a patient-dumping scheme. Such cherry-picking, as Dr. Jouriles accurately describes it, was, at one time, fairly common.
Prestigious institutions like the University of Chicago Medical Center routinely dumped Medicaid, uninsured and other unprofitable patients on less mercenary community hospitals.
Many patients suffered needlessly, and more than a few actually died, as the result of this practice. So, in 1986, President Reagan signed the Emergency Medical Labor and Treatment Act (EMTALA) into law.
EMTALA made such redirection illegal, but many high profile hospitals still chafed at being forced to treat poor patients.
Enter Michelle Obama, UCMCs Vice President for Community and External Affairs.
Mrs. Obama first hatched the UCMC program as the South Side Health Collaborative, which featured a gang of counselors whose job it was to advise low-income patients that they would be better off at other hospitals and clinics.
The program was so successful in getting rid of unwanted patients that she expanded it, gave it a new name, and hired none other than David Axelrod to sell the program to the public.
According to the Sun-Times, Obamas wife and Valerie Jarrett, an Obama friend and adviser who chairs the medical centers board, backed the Axelrod firms hiring. Axelrod helped the future First Lady formulate a public relations campaign in which the Urban Health Initiative was represented as a boon to the community actuated by the purest of altruistic motives.
The resultant PR campaign was a study in Orwellian audacity. Chicagos inner city residents soon began hearing that UCMCs patient dumping program would dramatically improve health care for thousands of South Side residents and that the medical center was generously willing to provide a ride on a shuttle bus to other centers.
Likewise, the people who ran the community hospitals to which these unwanted patients were being shuttled began to read claims in local media to the effect that the Urban Health Initiative was good for them as well.
Dr. Eric Whitaker, the Blagojevich crony who succeeded Mrs. Obama as Director of the program, repeatedly assured gullible reporters that the financial impact on these hospitals would be positive: The initiative actually is improving their bottom lines. The CFOs of those hospitals were no doubt relieved to learn that treating Medicaid and uninsured patients is profitable.
But you just cant please some people. In one of the few frank passages of the Post article, we discover that many members of UCMCs medical staff believe the program is nothing more than an attempt to ensure that the hospital retains only affluent patients with insurance.
And another association of emergency physicians has joined ACEP in denouncing the Urban Health Initiative. The Chicago Tribune reports that Dr. Larry Weiss, president of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine is unhappy about UCMCs failure to consult its own ER physicians before initiating the program: Not including emergency-room physicians ... would be analogous to changing the way surgery is performed in an operating room without involving any surgeons. Dr. Whitaker assures us, however, that such critics are merely opposed to change.
Presumably, he would be similarly dismissive of Angela Adams, who brought her son to the medical centers ER after his lip had been partially torn off by a pit bull.
As the Tribune puts it, Instead of rushing Dontae into surgery ... the hospitals staff began pressing her about insurance. Unfortunately for Dontae, he was covered by Medicaid. So, all he got from the UCMC emergency department was a shot, some antibiotics, and instructions to follow up with Cook County.
Angela had to take her son across town to John Stroger Hospital, where he was immediately admitted for reconstructive surgery. Like doctors Jouriles and Weiss, Angela is having trouble seeing the community benefit of the Urban Health Initiative.
Meanwhile, the programs parents, Michelle Obama and David Axelrod, have moved to Washington. As the First Lady and the Presidents closest advisor, they wield enormous power.
Indeed, they may be the most powerful people in the Obama Administration, aside from the President himself. If these two characters were willing to betray their Chicago neighbors the South Sides most vulnerable citizens with a disgraceful program like the Urban Health Initiative, what sort of mischief will they devise for the hapless denizens of flyover country?
Come to think of it, isnt Obamacare being sold to us in pretty much the same way the Urban Health Initiative was sold to Chicago?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/michelle_obamas_patientdumping_1.html
BUMP!
a few links & names
Why some Van Jones friends are happy about exit
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109199
“They have been chosen PRECISELY BECAUSE they are fellow travelers.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2334259/posts?page=4#4
From Freeper KHYNYNY
Imho, Sunstein is one of the more dangerous czars in this administration. He thinks FDR didnt go far enough with the New Deal and thinks that its time for the second part of the New Deal. Sunstein also thinks the US Constitution is open to vast interpretation and doesnt mean today what it meant when it was crafted by our forefathers. Dangerous guy.
Oh, and did I mention his wife, Samantha Power, was appointed by Obama to the National Security Council - this was after Power was fired from the Obama campaign for calling Hillary Clinton a monster in a foreign press interview. This gal thinks our military should get involved in global moral causes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2334438/posts?page=50#50
Just got home from running errands...What’s new? ANy word on who’s Glenn’s next target?...Who’s going to jail?....Any word on Orley?
Can’t find a word about it anywhere.
We’ll just have to wait, but my reading
of the Hearing Order was that it was
housekeeping stuff, not crital issues.
I could be wrong.
Liberal Women sure are UGLY!
Conservatives.... LET'S ROLL!
Another make believe lawyer from Harvard Law. Turd factory...
Interesting how all the brains are Jewish and all the hacks are black...
Great post, Maggie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.