Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KENNEDY'S FREE PASS WITH WOMEN: WHY DID SO MANY DISMISS HIS CRIMES?
NY Post ^ | August 30, 2009 | MAUREEN CALLAHAN

Posted on 08/30/2009 3:25:22 AM PDT by Scanian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Scanian

(Mark Steyn inspired a new tagline for me)

“Ted Kennedy went a different route. He got kitted out with a neck brace and went on TV and announced the invention of the ‘Kennedy curse,’ a concept that yoked him to his murdered brothers as a fellow victim — and not, as Mary Jo perhaps realized in those final hours, the perpetrator. He dared us to call his bluff, and, when we didn’t, he made all of us complicit in what he’d done. We are all prey to human frailty, but few of us get to inflict ours on an entire nation…

The senator’s actions in the hours and days after emerging from that pond tell us something ugly about Kennedy the man. That he got away with it tells us something ugly about American public life.”


61 posted on 08/30/2009 10:28:43 AM PDT by roses of sharon (Kennedy dared us to call his bluff, when we didn't, he made all of us complicit in what he had done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Something that I will say about Ted that I did not know, he was a college football star, that means that besides wealth and power he was also a manly man.

Ah, yes, the hype. Football star! Military man!

About that football, from the Harvard Crimson:

"Kennedy was a noted member of Harvard's football team during his college career, scoring the only Harvard touchdown in the Harvard-Yale Game his senior year. He turned down an offer of interest from the Green Bay Packers, instead opting to attend law school at the University of Virginia."

Even the Crimson can't get away with calling him a "star." He was "noted," which means he was a Kennedy, and by golly, Harvard better have him on the football team! And that touchdown is apparently the only highlight of his "star" status. No other stats, just that one touchdown, quoted over and over again. And, yeah, I'm sure the Packers were drooling over him, and he had dreams of playing pro ball. (Rolls eyes).

And that manly-man military service? Also from the Crimson:

At the end of his freshman year, Kennedy was suspended after having another student take a Spanish exam in his place. He spent the next two years serving in the U.S. Army as a military policeman in Paris before re-enrolling at Harvard in the fall of 1953.

Translation: he was kicked out of Harvard, and ol' Joe figured now's a good time to add military service to his CV, as long as the spoiled brat doesn't have to actually see combat, and disgrace himself and his family legend.  Voila! An MP in Paris! (With no disrespect intended to those vets who may have wound up in similar assignments without a Joe Kennedy pulling the strings.)

62 posted on 08/30/2009 10:39:17 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Yeah, like men never vote for democrats, right?


63 posted on 08/30/2009 11:27:34 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (http://koreanforniancooking.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
He should have been imprisoned for leaving Kopechne to die!

Oh well, Kennedy, like everyone esle, will have to face his Maker.
64 posted on 08/30/2009 12:00:22 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Once he broke free and swam to the surface, Kennedy said that he dove back down seven or eight times to rescue Kopechne.

What does "broke free" mean?:

1. Did Kennedy exit via the door or the window?
2. Was the door or window open when the car was discovered?
3. If so, how is is that Kennedy was able to escape and Ms. Kopechne was not?

65 posted on 08/30/2009 2:58:39 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

of course they do — but it’s the block of women that puts it over the top.


66 posted on 08/30/2009 8:55:53 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

yes, men did. Now subtract all the women who voted for him in a block — all because of abortion. He wouldn’t have won.


67 posted on 08/30/2009 8:57:08 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

And there were plenty of women who voted for McCain. By your logic, blacks and minorities shouldn’t be allowed to vote either because they vote more consistently for democrats than women do.


68 posted on 08/30/2009 9:03:38 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (http://koreanforniancooking.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

You raise an intersting point — how can we have democracy when we have an entire population delivered en mass as a voting block —


69 posted on 08/31/2009 8:30:10 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Because that is democracy, unfettered mob rule. What we’re losing is our Republic.


70 posted on 08/31/2009 10:54:45 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (http://koreanforniancooking.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
"I didn't know about Chappaquiddick and the rape case until yesterday," says Miriam Perez, a 25-year-old editor at Feministing.com.

Dumb as a stone ...


71 posted on 08/31/2009 11:16:45 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

You didn’t say anything much, you just said it with a sneer as though a sneer is substantive.

How powerful do you think a Kennedy was in 1955 do you think the other families of Harvard students then were just ordinary folk that were totally impressed with the Kennedy family of 1955?


72 posted on 08/31/2009 3:33:59 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
How powerful do you think a Kennedy was in 1955

Very.

You really do need to brush up on history. Joseph Kennedy, Sr., by 1955, was a Harvard grad himself, and a very wealthy and powerful man. Google it.

73 posted on 08/31/2009 4:06:35 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

I know my history and just how unique do you think that Ted’s pedigree was among the Harvard students and alumni in the early 50s? I doubt that the school was in awe of what was not it’s first student from a rich, somewhat powerful family in it’s more than 300 year history at that point.

This reminds me of people that think that George W. Bush was a giant among the world of yalies in 1964 because his dad was a President.


74 posted on 08/31/2009 4:21:04 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

you’re right. Sarted with Reconstruction and reached its peak with the 19th amendement.


75 posted on 08/31/2009 11:47:24 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson