Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HPV Vaccine - What Parents Need to Know
Townhall.com ^ | August 25, 2009 | Janice Shaw Crouse

Posted on 08/26/2009 5:11:05 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: TChris

prevents SOME kinds of cancer. sorry your sensibilities are offended by reality, it says so right in the commercials for it, it’s not a failsafe.


21 posted on 08/26/2009 8:39:54 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

And does absolutely NOTHING to prevent a whole host of deadly STDs that many young women will put themselves at risk for when the assume that this “vaccine” is protecting them.


22 posted on 08/26/2009 8:42:25 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

i have zero problem with those who want to vaccinate their children, but i will not sit still to be talked down to by yahoos who think they know better, when my husband and i, both educated and intelligent people, have researched this and reached our own conclusions. my nearly 21 yo daughter has made her own decision not to have the vaccine.


23 posted on 08/26/2009 8:45:46 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I agree completely.

Unfortunately, there are a great many young women who definitely NEED this vaccine. However, there are also quite a few young women who have NO REASON to get this vaccine (if, God forbid, they are raped the emergency room can take precautions for HPV). Unlike polio, chicken pox, mumps, measles and other viruses for which children are normally vaccinate, HPV does not spread through normal contact. It is a sexually tranmitted virus which women can CHOOSE NOT TO GET.

So, when xsteen turns 21 does she get to be xsadult?


24 posted on 08/26/2009 8:54:32 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

bump!


25 posted on 08/26/2009 8:57:31 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Comparing Polio with HPV is a bit of a stretch of examples.

Why not compare it to small pox while you are at it.

This vaccine, is not 100% effective, does not stop “cervical cancer”. In fact not one study ever done on it proves it can stop cervical cancer.

What it can do, when it works, is prevent certain types of HPV infections, when it works.

The devil is always in the details.

Yes certain HPV infections if they infect the vagina etc can cause Cancer later in life. However, these are not the only causes of cervical cancer.

There are about 11,000 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in the US per year. The 5 year survival rate of cervical cancer is 71%. If detected in the earliest stages, its 5 year survival rate is 92%. With both of these rates increasing annually.

Cervical cancer is also something that generally develops later in life, rarely seen in women under 20 years old and generally are mid life when it develops.

So, knowing your child could be permanently disabled or drop dead from a side effect for vaccine a disease that even if she contracts it, likely will not happen until she’s about 40, and she’ll likely survive by 70-90% or more depending on when its detected, is it worth the risk??

I hope I never have to bury a child, but if I do, I hope I’m hoping they are in their 40s, rather than in their teens.

Honest risk/reward on this vaccine doesn’t equate to a “no brainer” when its properly analyzed.

Let women make up their own minds on this, but don’t think screwing with a 9 year olds autoimmune system, like this vaccine does, doesn’t come with some very searious and real long term risks. Not all reactions will be known for years, there are long term risks especially when given to young girls, that won’t be known for years.


26 posted on 08/26/2009 9:01:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

she can go by whatever she likes in her real life, but on FR she will be xsteen in perpetuity! ; )


27 posted on 08/26/2009 9:06:17 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

That seems a little mean! :-)


28 posted on 08/26/2009 9:10:30 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

she looks young for her age anyway ; )


29 posted on 08/26/2009 9:12:12 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Not all reactions will be known for years, there are long term risks especially when given to young girls, that won’t be known for years.

This has been my concern all along. Why the rush to vaccinate millions of girls (many of whom ARE NOT AT RISK) against a virus (which IS TREATABLE) that sometimes causes a TREATABLE form of cancer?

NOBODY can say what the effects of Gardasil will be on these girls in 10 or 15 years.

30 posted on 08/26/2009 9:15:15 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for posting this, Kaslin. People really need to take a very close look at the risks versus the potential benefits of this new vaccine.


31 posted on 08/26/2009 9:22:44 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; neverdem; appleseed; MamaTexan; Paleo Conservative; ConservaTexan; Politicalmom; ...

Ping


32 posted on 08/26/2009 9:31:16 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I agree with the above (post #1). An attempt at another shortcut for folks. It is much harder job for parents to teach and guide their children in chastity. Boys and girls. As well as it is a tough job to supervise them, knowing where and whom they are associating with. I reckon many buy into this and think a shot is the prudent thing to do and well “nowadays all teenagers experiment and have sex” so they surrender half way through the child’s life. In the meantime my husband & I will do many things to continue to counsel and raise our children to care for themselves and others with the utmost respect.


33 posted on 08/26/2009 9:35:26 AM PDT by 4Godsoloved..Hegave (Never explain yourself, Your friends don't need it and your enemies won't believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"But a disturbing seven percent included hospitalization, permanent disability, life-threatening illness, or death."

Seven percent permanently harmed is still pretty high for the skank vaccine. It's disgusting they are pushing this on young girls, too young and misinformed to understand the dangers. They are going to have to track these girls for weird reproductive, fertility, and gynecological problems, as well as automimmune diseases.


Population Control

34 posted on 08/26/2009 9:43:38 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Texan Tory

Exactly! Thank you for articulating this so well.


35 posted on 08/26/2009 9:44:32 AM PDT by TNdandelion (I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Kaslin
Why indeed? And why girls so young? Maybe because it has VERY LITTLE
to do with preventing disease and is some other kind of experiment.

Tetanus Vaccines, Spontaneous Abortions, and Population Control

36 posted on 08/26/2009 9:49:49 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Take the miniscule risk of Bad Things happening so your daughter can be protected from cancer?

(1) The vaccine only protects against some strains of HPV that cause cancer, not all of them.

(2) It lasts only five years.

(3) You only get the virus from intimate contact. You can't get it from casual contact.

No, sorry, it's not a "NO BRAINER," not even close. Especially not for 11 yo girls.

37 posted on 08/26/2009 9:55:52 AM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
Research is showing that women beyond the current target age range also benefit from this vaccine but the cost is prohibitive. While a parent may think they are doing the best thing for their children by not giving them the vaccine at the most effective time, their daughters may still be able to gain some protection from this cancer later on when they can make their own decisions.

Cervical cancer is very treatable IF it is caught early. But if it's not caught early, it can be deadly.

38 posted on 08/26/2009 9:58:25 AM PDT by TNdandelion (I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Doesn't that fact prove that this isn't a "no consequences sex" medical treatment? If it doesn't prevent pregnancy and doesn't prevent any STD's...and only protects a woman from a potentially cancer causing virus that she could be exposed to through marital sex or rape...

Sounds like a pretty damn smart thing to do. But like I said...I'm waiting to make sure the vaccine is safe when my daughters reach puberty.

39 posted on 08/26/2009 10:04:30 AM PDT by TNdandelion (I'd rather have FedEx run my healthcare than USPS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

Getting the shot doesn’t say anything about their virtue.

My niece got married a little over a year ago, 2 months after she got married she found woman walking out of her home. The woman had been sleeping with her husband even while my niece was engaged.

My niece had to get all kinds of tests to see if she had a STD.

I have 12 year old twin girls. I think they are a bit young to get the vaccine. One of them has a brain injury and seizures and some other medical issues. I was talking to her cardiologist about vaccines and even she said to wait a few years on this one. (My gynecologist was encouraging me to get my daugnters vaccinated, but she doesn’t know their medical history.)

I know my daughters aren’t having sex at this time. They barely even talk to boys. I would like to wait until they are 18 so they can make an informed decision about this vaccine on their own.


40 posted on 08/26/2009 10:05:11 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson