Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum dips toes in 2012 Iowa waters
Politico ^ | 8/11/09 | Jon Martin

Posted on 08/11/2009 6:04:12 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: steve-b
There’s also bits of petty corruption such as his attempts to restrict the publication of National Weather Service data so that his buddies at AccuWeather could repackage and sell it at a markup.

Yep, and the debacle here in Western Pa. with Santorum's house. Santorum criticized others for getting elected and moving to DC. Then he got elected as Senator and moved to Virginia...but claimed that he, his wife and their six kids were still living primarily in a little three bedroom house in Pennsylvania.

Petty lies and corruption indeed, plus support of establishment candidates over principled ones -- IMO Santorum caught beltway fever just like most of our other "public servants."

61 posted on 08/12/2009 7:26:06 PM PDT by ellery (It's a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Thompson split votes in South Carolina so McCain could win.

What a steaming load! Fred Thompson did finish third in SC behind neo-liberals McCain and Huckabee but he certainly did not split votes with either of those two.

62 posted on 08/12/2009 7:31:16 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I watched National Right To Life annoint Bush early and trash McCain in 2000. They saw Bush as the “electable” man.

In 2008 the NRL strategy was not to annoint McCain because people had become wise to them and they didn’t want to admit McCain was their man after trashing him over Campaign Finance Reform.

So they came out for Fred Thompson helping conservative votes to be split in favor of the “electable” McCain.

Then some state affiliates in certain southern states endorsed Huckabee again as a means of splitting up votes in the primaries as Thompson’s campaign faltered.

The endgame was to split Huckabee and Romney support so McCain would win.

Now I suspect NRL’s game plan is Romney in 2012.

Santorum is being sent out to Iowa early to help create a conservative vote split away from Palin so Romney comes out ahead.

It is conceivable that NRL may endorse Santorum like they did Thompson as part of the scheme.

National Right To Life cannot openly endorse the flip flopping Willard M. Romney although they want him to win the nomination as the most “electable” candidate.


63 posted on 08/12/2009 7:53:28 PM PDT by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Thanks for the information. I am aware of Bopp's allegiance to Romney, which is a cause for much concern. You've opened my eyes and placed doubt about behind the scenes politicking and motives of some executives at NRL. I have met and liked Santorum, but any allegiance to Romney bears watching. There seems to be an attempt to drive a wedge between Santorum and Palin which I don't believe actually exists.

On another note, your story about Palin's appearance at the Indiana RTL event would seem to implicate her as a part of the 'GOP establishment' in your mind. As you infer, it would be Bopp (from Indiana) who got her to do it. You also suggest it was to 'redeem' Steele (who I have little regard for). Are you also suggesting that Sarah wanted to help in this endeavor and is as much a patsy to the 'GOP establishment' as you suggest Santorum is?

64 posted on 08/13/2009 6:58:54 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Sarah Palin did it out of sincerity, but I believe she was used by the organizers to give Steele a platform to redeem himself after his Roe comments and Rush comments.


65 posted on 08/13/2009 9:23:46 AM PDT by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson