Skip to comments.
Cash For Clunkers Is Selling More Trucks, Not Small Cars
The Business Insider ^
| 8/7/09
Posted on 08/07/2009 3:03:44 PM PDT by FromLori
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
08/07/2009 3:03:44 PM PDT
by
FromLori
To: FromLori
2
posted on
08/07/2009 3:04:46 PM PDT
by
FromLori
(FromLori)
To: FromLori
They’re not trucks and SUV’s. They’re future “clunkers”.
To: FromLori
Wait a minute — I can buy an F-150 under cash for clunkers?
Can’t be!
4
posted on
08/07/2009 3:06:28 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(What is so offensive about liberty that it must be "reformed" out of existence?)
To: FromLori
In other words, people are looking for a bug out vehicle for when it hits the fan.
5
posted on
08/07/2009 3:06:59 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
To: FromLori
Typical Congressional program. They can't see second or third order consequences to their asinine programs.
6
posted on
08/07/2009 3:07:40 PM PDT
by
tips up
To: FromLori
"The reality is this is a program that has been working," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who called cash for clunkers "the most effective stimulus we have passed this year."
President Obama, who had been hammering Congress for action, said the program "has been a proven success: The initial transactions are generating a more than 50% increase in fuel economy; they are generating $700 to $1000 in annual savings for consumers in reduced gas costs alone; and they are getting the oldest, dirtiest and most air-polluting trucks and SUVs off the road for good."
7
posted on
08/07/2009 3:11:23 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: FromLori
Myself, I’m glad to see people buying Ford more than Obama motors.
To: BenLurkin
It’s true. And other big’uns as well.
9
posted on
08/07/2009 3:11:57 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: BenLurkin
All it has to get is 2 miles better mpg than your present car to qualify for $3500, and if it gets 5 miles better mpg (I think that’s the figure) then you get $4500.
We have a 1997 Toyota 4 Runner, and we could get $3500 to turn it in for a new one, because the newer ones get better gas mileage than the older 4Runners.
10
posted on
08/07/2009 3:12:23 PM PDT
by
dawn53
To: FromLori
The whole universe is laughing at us over this one.
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment

Ford Escape
12
posted on
08/07/2009 3:14:16 PM PDT
by
blam
To: FromLori
Hmmm....4 Fords...
Could it be those "Freepers" that said they wouldn't buy anything else?
Use the money to nix Obama's fav's GM and Chrysler.....
Schadenfreude Baby..
13
posted on
08/07/2009 3:15:00 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Palin / Mulally 2012)
To: FromLori
Ford
Ford
UAW/Fiat
UAW/Fiat
Ford
Honda
Government Motors
Government Motors
Toyota
Ford
Too bad about the two UAW/Fiats and two Government Motors vehicles.
I had heard that six of the top ten were Hondas, Toyotas or Hyundais. I wonder if that is true depending on how you count it or if it was just BS to begin with.
14
posted on
08/07/2009 3:15:54 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Obama's medical nationalization bill reads like Atlas Shrugged with doctors instead of railroads.)
To: bgill
"In other words, people are looking for a bug out vehicle for when it hits the fan." Well...it is named Escape.
You can buy it cheaper next year after it's repossessed.
15
posted on
08/07/2009 3:16:23 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Lorianne
"The reality is this is a program that has been working," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who called cash for clunkers "the most effective stimulus we have passed this year." More than likely it is just cannibalizing sales from future months. The tumbleweeds will be blowing through dealer's lots again by October.
16
posted on
08/07/2009 3:17:30 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Obama's medical nationalization bill reads like Atlas Shrugged with doctors instead of railroads.)
To: bgill
They are trying to
remove such vehicles from the fleet....
when you have a clunker, you are not so attached to it....
17
posted on
08/07/2009 3:19:56 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Palin / Mulally 2012)
To: FromLori
The gas mileage requirements in the Clunker law are much more lenient for trucks and SUVs compared to cars. A lot of folks who own old trucks and SUVs are naturally going to be inclined to purchase the same type vehicle. It’s a no brainer if you have an old truck/SUV and are in the market for a new one.
To: KarlInOhio
Fear of mine as well. Are they pulling sales forward, or were their a lot of high mileage non-oil burning with good rings family cars that will meet their untimely death because of this plan.
:How does that effect; Charities, Small Business/Junk Yards etc.
The unintended consequences are mind-boggling...
19
posted on
08/07/2009 3:23:22 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Palin / Mulally 2012)
To: FromLori
This is not going to work for most people. If your present car is worth more than $4500 you lose. You should otherwise just sell it on the open market or trade it in. This is not in addition to the trade-in value. See Edmunds for the skinny on how this works.
20
posted on
08/07/2009 3:24:56 PM PDT
by
RichardW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson