Posted on 08/05/2009 3:26:49 PM PDT by Syncro
Yeah, okay, whatever. If you're going to deliberately misconstrue the meaning of what I said quite plainly, there's nothing left to debate.
Michelle is doing a good job.
Nonsense. You don't have to be a birther to believe in the "Founders idea of America". The eligibility question is a matter of facts. The facts aren't determined by political views.
Unless you actually have proof and have seen it, you're the one making wild assumptions, and don't forget that.
Every sane birther, and I'd like to think that that is most of them, know that they don't have the proof.
Absence of proof does not prove that something is not true.
Otherwise, birthers would be no better than Dan Rather and Memogate.
Ann is not what many would consider a main stream run of the mill Republican...We know that...Certainly she must know that...And that’s why we like her...
I find it odd that Ann would dis her very own base, and that’s what I believe she is doing...
Maybe she is trying to go mainstream with the rest of the Rinos...
What a shame. I once mistook her for someone who cared about the Constitution.
I’m betting Obama is even shocked to find her as part of his line of defense.
Show me the proof that 99% of Americans do not think 0bama is hiding his BC.
What am I missing?
I don't see anything here that says she doesn't care about the Constitution, all I see is that she doesn't believe he is not a citizen.
Why is Ann suddenly grasping for irrelevance?
You, an erstwhile "conservative," think that recognized, legitimate Constitutional issues pertaining to the highest office in the land are only worthy of mockery?
Yes, I am telling you that logic is not your strong suit. And, neither is the English language.
When they see something they don't like, the leftists say the exact same thing.
It's an Alinsky tactic, that and the incessant name calling.
Shut people up you don't agree with.
Call them names.
Make false accusations.
Instead she chooses to attack conservatives
I read this column, did you?
Here is a list of who she attacks in the column:
You see those as conservatives? I don't.
She also points out that some people believed these things:
-- O.J. is innocent;She is not attacking conservatives, she is attacking liberals, leftists.
-- Bush shirked his National Guard duty;
-- Sarah Palin's infant child, Trig, was actually the child of her daughter;
-- Justice Antonin Scalia threw the 2000 election to Bush so that his son could get a legal job with the Labor Department;
-- The spectacularly guilty Mumia Abu-Jamal was framed;
-- The Diebold Corp. secretly stole thousands of Kerry votes in 2004;
-- Duke lacrosse players gang-raped a stripper;
-- Bill Clinton did not have sex with "that woman";
-- Heterosexuals are just as likely to contract AIDS as gays;
-- John Edwards didn't have an affair with Rielle Hunter;
-- John Edwards' campaign aide Andrew Young is the father of Rielle Hunter's child.
Why can't people get it through their heads that all politics and criminal acts are, by nature, a conspiracy? Just because you aren't smart enough to put together the pieces of the puzzle doesn't make the pursuit of facts lunacy.
That said, this is a distraction from health care and the failing socialist agenda. Think of the timing.
Don't be an alinsky fool, you are using communist tactics. Reason with people. The timing for this fight is not right.
She’s using Alinskyite tactics on those who simply want to see it proven that one of the simplest provisions of the Constitution is being upheld and defended. I don’t know how you could miss such an obvious thing.
However, Ann is broken clock on this subject.
One person can only do so much.
Everyone must choose their battles.
If everyone fought just one issue, it would be counterproductive.
People change with wealth. Maybe Ann’s sudden wealth has changed her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.