Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House bill to hit millionaires with 5.4 pct surtax
Reuters ^ | Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:41pm ED | Donna Smith

Posted on 07/14/2009 1:01:41 PM PDT by curth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Dr. Ursus
What did they do. Move to Colorado and continue to vote Democratic?

Got it in one, Brother.

21 posted on 07/14/2009 1:18:46 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (This tagline temporarily closed until I finish building my deck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
Poor headline wording. Those with $1 million in income per year doesn’t equate with ‘millionaire.’

Maybe they'll next go after anyone with a net worth of $1 million.

22 posted on 07/14/2009 1:19:07 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

They asked for it, let them pay it.

They won’t actually pay it of course. They’ll just adjust pricing and compensation accordingly.

It’s still a message to them, though.


23 posted on 07/14/2009 1:22:17 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: curth

This wonderful congress, doing the will of the people, should declare an emergency, confiscate all wealth, and re-distribute it as they see fit.

It’s only fair, dontcha know?

/S/

IMHO


24 posted on 07/14/2009 1:22:35 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Very possible. I’ll expect the media to mess up that story’s headline also.


25 posted on 07/14/2009 1:22:41 PM PDT by posterchild (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: curth
The tax rate is higher than the 3 percent surtax lawmakers had been discussing earlier and would be imposed on those making more than $1 million a year...

As others post above, the net gain to the Treasury will be negative.

The useful fools in the Congress cling religiously to the false notion that raising taxes equates to greater revenue (even though so many of them have had such astounding memory lapses when it comes to reporting their own income.)

From their perspective, it's important to settle a score with those greedy "millionaires", even if it costs a million jobs of the "millionaires'" soon-to-be-former employees.

.

26 posted on 07/14/2009 1:30:07 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


CLICKIT





27 posted on 07/14/2009 1:31:50 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (BG x 2 (and a heartbeat was heard today....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

The real horror will begin when they are no longer satisfied with an income tax, and want a “wealth tax”. So even if you earn nothing, but have a million dollars, they can keep taxing and taxing and taxing it.


28 posted on 07/14/2009 1:31:58 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Back in the great depression, there was a 100% tax on anyone who made 25k or more. And they wonder why no private person would invest any money.

One thing I would love to see is taxing actors at 100% over 100k and see what they say.


29 posted on 07/14/2009 1:32:33 PM PDT by mriguy67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Let me guess, they will define millionaires as anyone making over $100k per year.

Too late, already been done, although with a higher level of income.

Then VP Al Gore famously stated that anyone making $250,000 a year were millionaires because after only four years they'd have a million dollars.

30 posted on 07/14/2009 1:34:45 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Spread that wealth, baby.


31 posted on 07/14/2009 1:35:02 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: curth
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” (or needs)

is a slogan popularized by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.[1] The phrase summarizes the principles that, under a communist system, every person should contribute to society to the best of his ability and consume from society in proportion to his needs, regardless of how much he has contributed. In the Marxist view, such an arrangement will be made possible by the abundance of goods and services that a developed communist society will produce; the idea is that there will be enough to satisfy everyone’s needs.”

The above is a quote from Wikipedia.....
It perfectly describes this proposal, along with others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_need

32 posted on 07/14/2009 1:41:02 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I agree with Rick..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

well this certainly won’t encourage investment or hiring anytime soon


33 posted on 07/14/2009 1:49:53 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

I’m sitting heare fetting a good feeling out of just imaging Bill

I’m sitting here getting a good feeling out of just imaginging Bill Gates paying for a therapeutic pedicure on my aching feet.

gates paying for a the


34 posted on 07/14/2009 1:52:43 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

Why do we even bother with the entire equal protection under the law crap anymore?

This entire administration and 99.9% of our elected officials should be in prison.


35 posted on 07/14/2009 1:56:48 PM PDT by Brytani (DC Freeper Convention and National Tea Party - FreepMail Me for rooms and convention info!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

This will hit a lot of movie stars and liberals. I wonder how they will react?


36 posted on 07/14/2009 1:57:33 PM PDT by BobMV (Usurper in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

From what I hear he wouldn’t mind. He gives money away, and his dad was pushing for the Estate tax because (as he said) the wealthy should pay more, etc, etc.


37 posted on 07/14/2009 1:59:39 PM PDT by BobMV (Usurper in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“Let me guess, they will define millionaires as anyone making over $100k per year.”

It worked for Clinton.


38 posted on 07/14/2009 2:02:50 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: curth

This won’t effect most people, so in the country today no one will care. The whole idea of right or wrong is irrelevant.


39 posted on 07/14/2009 2:08:15 PM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curth

I’m sure alot of these millionaires are dems. Ha, you get what you vote for.


40 posted on 07/14/2009 2:31:40 PM PDT by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson