Our Foreign Policy Neophyte (0bambi's Russian Vacation)

RealClearPolitics ^ | 7/10/2009 | CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

[ohioWfan]

What I described can be interpreted as relativism.

I am not now, nor have I ever been a relativist. In any area of my life, and most definitely not when it comes to evil.

I'm sorry I did not make myself clear, and will not assume that you are just picking a fight for the sake of fighting.

[TigersEye]

I am not picking a fight just to pick a fight. Thank you for that benefit of the doubt. I will extend the same to you and appreciate that I may not have understood you and you may not have expressed yourself the way you meant to.

I am a little sensitive to a strain of thought around here that Bill and Hill Clinton are not as dangerous or as committed to the same agenda as 0bummer is. I think he is a little more audacious about it which I think will be his downfall.

It is precisely because the Clinton's are more cautious (due IMO to the fact that they actually know America) that I consider them the more dangerous ones. The fact is they are all working together as we speak.

[ohioWfan]

Interesting perspective.

I agree that Hillary has the same ideology as Obama, but I think Bill is a valueless narcissist whose only ideology is himself. I think he only compromised and did some good things (eg. welfare reform) to keep his poll numbers up.

I'm not sure if I agree that Hillary is more dangerous because she's more cautious. I completely agree that because she knows America....i.e. is an American.......that she would take a slower path to the same goal. I'm just not sure if that's more dangerous.

In any case, we've got a very dangerous anti-American dictator wannabe in the White House, and we have to get rid of him while we still have a country left.

[TigersEye]

...but I think Bill is a valueless narcissist whose only ideology is himself.

ROTFLOL Yep, he certainly projects that image. I think he believes that he doesn't. But he is actually quite a ruthless character.

I ask you, what is more dangerous, someone who overreaches by a mile and gets kicked to the curb with extreme prejudice? Or one who is never really pinned to any substantive wrong doing and gets pieces of their agenda ingrained into the system?

No one would ever believe about Bill what they do about Barack yet he said almost the same things about our "radical" Constitution. You don't even take him seriously. His goofy persona, which is quite real, masks a deadly serious ideologue with major anger issues.

I also take into consideration that Bill and Hill have over sixteen years of experience in executive positions. They know what to do with the reigns of power and have over twenty five years worth of connections built up.

[ohioWfan]

Actually I take Bill seriously only because of his political alliance (not marriage) with Hillary.

I wonder how Hillary likes being marginalized by Obama. She, as we know, is a racist and a very mean person. I wonder what her plans are to destroy him.

I don't think either Bill or Hill have a future in U.S. politics, though.

Then again, I didn't think the country would ever be stupid enough to elect Obama, so I could be very wrong about that.

[TigersEye]

I don't think either Bill or Hill have a future in U.S. politics, though.

I don't either but they do. LOL

Unfortunately they kind of have a present in politics even if it isn't as office holders.

Then again, I didn't think the country would ever be stupid enough to elect Obama, so I could be very wrong about that.

I understand that sentiment.

I wonder what her plans are to destroy him.

I think her best bet, and ours for the moment, is to give him all the rope he wants. He seems eager to take all he can get. He's such a noob.