Skip to comments.
A Letter to Our Readers (WaPo's Weymouth: "dog ate homework" - Dinosaur Media DeathWatchâ„¢)
The Washington Post ^
| July 5, 2009
| Katherine Weymouth
Posted on 07/05/2009 3:11:51 AM PDT by abb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
To: abb
61
posted on
07/05/2009 3:01:05 PM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: martin_fierro
I want to apologize for a venture that went off track, and I am announcing a brand new money-maker: For $25,000, we at the Wash/Po will let you watch several muscle-bound construction workers manhandle Rahm Emanuel.
"O-o-o-o-o, I can't wait.
62
posted on
07/05/2009 3:16:21 PM PDT
by
Liz
(When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
To: Liz
63
posted on
07/05/2009 3:19:52 PM PDT
by
timestax
(CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
To: Liz
For $25,000, we at the Wash/Po will let you watch several muscle-bound construction workers manhandle Rahm Emanuel. Will have be before for after the soiree at the Publisher's mansion?
64
posted on
07/05/2009 3:49:11 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Raped five year olds can get press at the Washington Post -if we can raise the money to buy access.)
To: abb
Eleven salons planned at $250,000 per "sponsor" for the package, two participants per "sponsor." Four such "sponsors" would have brought in a cool million dollars. Dozens of them, well, the math isn't difficult. That's what was involved here.
The notion that the Post was doing anything other than selling access to political figures is simply false. Such events, in the words of the flyer, "make the news." While corrupt enough, that isn't the issue - the issue is whether such events make the policy as well.
That would, of course, be highly unethical and quite illegal, but it wouldn't be the Post's problem. And it would certainly help ticket sales, wouldn't it? And if the journalists there wanted to keep their own access to this club they'd better be discreet about what they print about it. Hadn't they?
To: GOPJ
ASAP-—Rahm can’t wait.....LOL.
66
posted on
07/05/2009 3:54:21 PM PDT
by
Liz
(When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson