Many are pondering Sarah’s next move: Abrupt resignation may suggest a run for Senate or president

The Wilkes-Barre Times Leader / The Associated Press ^ | July 5, 2009 | Rachel D'Oro

[American in Israel]

As Obama got his first election by destroying the opposition so that he was the only standing politician when it came to vote...

Whereas the same exact method is being use by the massive spurious ethics complaints against the standing Governor of Alaska.

I submit:

[American in Israel]

0bama didn’t resign midterm and then sit around for 3 years.

I realize you may be misinformed or just plain stupid, but Sarah has gotten more done a month in Alaska that Obama has done in his lifetime.

Sarah stands on a HUGE record of accomplishments while in office. Obama stands on a huge record of absence in office and voting present for not doing his homework when he deigns to show of for works once in a great while.

Since you ignore reality to say something that stinks for attention you are obviously a

[counterpunch]

We’re talking about public perception and electability.
A politician is either on their way up, or on their way down.
Sarah left office without having another one she was entering.

She could come back to political office in a decade perhaps, after establishing herself as an elder statesman of sorts, if that is in the cards for her. But that would require her being viewed as having been vindicated on something, and she really has nothing to be vindicated on. She has not been a Churchill figure, singularly alerting a sleepy and resistant public to an impending danger.