SPITZER: I'M NO MARK SANFORD (Brags about not falling in love with his call girls)

New York Post (Page Six) ^ | June 28, 2009 | Richard Johnson

[Steel Wolf]

Both are idiots of the worst kind! One thinks that the law does not apply to him and the other thinks that he is like the “one” - nothing can touch him.

Uh, which is which again?

[jazminerose]

What world am I living in? Spitzer claims the moral hi ground for having paid for meaningless sex rather than an actual love affair?

[NordP]

"...THERE'S a huge difference between what South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford did, and what ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer did. "I didn't fall in love with any of them," Spitzer was overheard telling LMDC executive director Avi Schick..."

A psychiatrist's wet dream.

[andy58-in-nh]

This is what passes today for moral superiority on the Left: my infidelity was less odious than yours because I bought a whore, whereas you fell in love.

[freespirited]

And Spitzer didn't use any taxpayer money on his trysts

I think that claim is debatable. He set up business events as cover for the trysts and must have taken staff and security with him.

[BenLurkin]

"I didn't fall in love with any of them," Spitzer bragged.

Ah -- the warped world of Rat "values".

[PJ-Comix]

I wonder how Spitzer is getting his “relief” nowadays. He is probably too scared to pay hookers again and Silda is avoiding his talleywhacker like the plague because she knows where it has been sans protection. And the idea that Eliot has a girlfriend on the side is also out of the question since NO normal woman could love his ugly bony frame that is completely lacking in the slightest bit of charm.

[Peter ODonnell]

This is the dumbest political claim since Stalin said, “At least I didn’t have a holocaust.”

[NativeNewYorker]

Spitzer didn't use any taxpayer money on his trysts

He paid his own travel and security? Bull.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Old fashioned romances are so 20th century.

[Deagle]

Ha... well, one is man-made, and both are god-made... Seems like not so large a difference if you think about it...

[calex59]

Well, I would think most wives wouldn't see that between being unfaithful with prostitutes was somehow better than doing it for love. What an a**hat.

In fact I would have to say the exact opposite, at least Sanford can claim love as an inducement(Not that I condone it), Spitzer can only claim lust.

[elkfersupper]

What a creep

Which one?

I'm with Spitzer on this one. You pay for it one way or another, what is the point in getting attached?

[PJ-Comix]

And what was with his Muppet Mouth when the scandal broke?

[Hot Tabasco]

"I didn't fall in love with any of them,"

Can $3,000 an hour buy you more love than the mere $50 I can afford? I mean, once the lights are off, who can tell the difference?

[Dr. Scarpetta]

Geraldo just had someone on who reported that Sanford’s girlfriend also had another boyfriend in Argentina.

[Deagle]

All claims by Stanford will go over just fine with Democrats - unfortunately, he has to answer to Republicans. So... When are you going to resign Mark? You have zero chance of re-election...better get in your licks now. Republicans actually (most of them - leaving out the establishment Republicans, you know, those that already have a job in Washington) will have nothing to do with you...

[headstamp 2]

Eliot thinks he takes the high road in this comparison? He needs to keep his pie hole shut. He has nothing to brag about.

[Deagle]

Not much different than Sanford - just Sanford had a bit more emotion (politicians get to practice that a bunch)...

[Lady Jag]

ARREST ALL POLITICAL NARCISSISTS






That ought to take of most of them.