Skip to comments.
Mexican Truckers File $6 Billion Claim Against U.S. in Nafta Spat
WSJ ^
| June 2 2009
| JOSE DE CORDOBA
Posted on 06/02/2009 4:38:43 AM PDT by radar101
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
To: 1rudeboy
Dollars over humanity. <);~)
81
posted on
06/03/2009 5:34:05 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
Why anyone chooses to be a Texan can be the subject matter of another thread. Why Texans think they "own"
any subject matter is a mystery.
Personally, I think it's because some people don't wear hats in the sun.
82
posted on
06/03/2009 5:35:00 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
So I’m going to assume we won’t need to save a seat at the table for you?
Why don’t you start that *Texas* thread. I’ll gladly come post if you ping me. I’ll also bring a few friends.
83
posted on
06/03/2009 11:46:36 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
Friends, as in other people who do not read the stuff they post before posting it? No thanks.
84
posted on
06/03/2009 11:57:39 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
Found it . . .
here is the thread where the argument was being made that Ronald Reagan allegedly repudiated NAFTA because of all the added environmental provisions.
85
posted on
06/03/2009 12:11:36 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
I wouldn’t want to expose my friends to people who take everything out of context either.
86
posted on
06/03/2009 1:18:38 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
Be serious. Pointing out that someone's example is "context-free" is not taking someone's example "out of context."
Face it, you didn't know dick when you started posting your examples, and now you're pretending it never mattered.
87
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:08 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Naw, I don’t know *dick* (except a couple of Yankees)
Remember this site?
http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/bp173/
NAFTA was created to embellish the elites. Even the pols that voted for it are having second thoughts.
88
posted on
06/03/2009 1:36:36 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
Remember this site? Remind me, is it from another one of those groups you don't associate with? LOL
89
posted on
06/03/2009 1:38:27 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
I work alone, unlike you and your uh.....ping list.
90
posted on
06/03/2009 1:44:44 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
That appears to be a large part of the problem, and I'm embarrassed for you. Listen, give me some time and I'll find you some sources to use that support your side of things from a conservative perspective. You're not educating anyone by posting liberal crap.
91
posted on
06/03/2009 1:47:14 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
The numbers on that site speak for themselves but, if you you must.
92
posted on
06/03/2009 2:04:22 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
EPI? LOL! Anything from CPUSA?
93
posted on
06/03/2009 2:25:16 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Toddsterpatriot; 1rudeboy; cripplecreek
Vote on Mexican trucking: (actual topic of thread)
House 395 to 18
Senate 75 to 23
Now, who is wrong here?
94
posted on
06/03/2009 2:42:11 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: wolfcreek
House 395 to 18 Senate 75 to 23
Now, who is wrong here?
Was someone disputing the vote count?
95
posted on
06/03/2009 2:47:09 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: radar101
The groups goes by the name “cancar”. How appropriate.
96
posted on
06/03/2009 2:49:25 PM PDT
by
RC one
To: wolfcreek; Mase; 1rudeboy
Great site.
Canadians were assured that NAFTA and the earlier Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement were necessary to save the social safety net of which they are justly proud. Yet a dozen years later, government transfers to individuals have dropped from 11.5% of GDP to 7.8% of the country's GDP, and Canadian government's overall (non-military) program spending fell from 42.9% of GDP in 1992 to 33.6% of GDP in 2001 (see Canadian analysis starting on p. 53).
OMG! EPI is upset that welfare spending and overall government spending is lower since NAFTA.
That's some company you keep.
97
posted on
06/03/2009 2:52:06 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: wolfcreek
The numbers on that site speak for themselves but, if you you must. What's next in your bag of tricks? A DNC press release? With numbers that "speak for themselves," because you cannot?
98
posted on
06/03/2009 3:51:54 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
We can't afford more NAFTA's.
The numbers speak for themselves, right? I mean, they must . . . because I agree with with them. I don't associate myself with them though, except when I do.
/protectionist
99
posted on
06/03/2009 4:00:12 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: radar101
Outsourcing trucking seems like a good plan. Just look how great our economy has been doing since we got rid of all those other overpaid American workers. Now there’s more dollars than ever. Outsource all jobs, free money for everyone!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson